Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

Latest LIVE show

Hereward Fenton

January 17, 2015
In today's show we look at two free speech issues which highlight a paradox in the discourse prevalent in modern democracies. Get the podcast »

Listen Live or Call In !

Recent News & Podcasts

The free speech paradox

January 17, 2015, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

20 January 2015 | Permalink | comments: 2
By Hereward Fenton

Free Speech Paradox - Sherri Tenpenny Vs Charlie Hebdo
Left: Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, vaccine safety campaigner, Right: Charlie Hebdo Magazine cover ("The Koran is shit")

In today's show we look at two free speech issues which highlight a paradox in the discourse prevalent in modern democracies.

In France the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo's right to vilify Muslims is defended by the government and the media as an important and necessary bastion of free speech, while in Australia media hounds and lobby groups bay for the blood of an American osteopath who wants to come to conduct a lecture series about vaccine safety issues.

It appears indeed that "free speech" is only condoned these days if it serves the agenda of the rich and powerful. 

Related Links

Deconstructing media coverage of the Sydney Siege

December 20, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
December 20, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

03 January 2015 | Permalink | comments: 44
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Big Brother, Media Lies, Sydney Siege ]

Sydney siege victims remembered
 
In the first hour of today's show we examine the mainstream coverage of the "Sydney siege", which resulted in the deaths of three people including the hostage-taker and alleged gunman Man Haron Monis. We provide some criticism and analysis of the salient facts of the case, and we also point out how the media has systematically avoided asking important questions such as who actually fired the deadly shots and why the building was stormed by police. Please note that this show was recorded within 48 hours of the events, so it may lack vital information which has since become available.
 
TNRA will be re-visiting this topic again soon. If any listeners can contribute to our understanding of this event please get in touch with us via the contact page.
 
In the 2nd hour we welcome back to the show Luke McKee who joins us from Vietnam to discuss some little known Australian laws which are stifling free speech by making it a crime to "seek information about a police officer". Luke shares with us some of his own personal saga in trying to clear his name after having been accused of breaching these rather peculiar statutes.
 
Related Links

NASA’s new space program: real or theater?

December 13, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
December 13, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

23 December 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

In today's show we take a critical view of the new NASA space program which aims to send astronauts to the Moon and beyond within the next 10 years.

In the 2nd hour we welcome Damon Crowe back to the show to talk about the latest research into the Van Allen radiation belts, which have recently been the subject of extraordinary scrutiny by NASA.

In the first hour we also look at some recent vaccination propaganda, which has come forth in the form of scientific studies which purport to understand why people refuse vaccines and how to change their behaviour.

We also take a look at a possible softening in stance from the global elite towards Russia as Henry KIssenger comes forward to defend Vladimir Putin.

Related Links

Who controls the world, and what can you do about it?

December 6, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
December 6, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

12 December 2014 | Permalink | comments: 30
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Nazi Germany, Simon Treselyan ]

US Dollar
US dollar bill featuring the Illuminati "all seeing eye"

In today's show we cover some difficult ground.

In the first hour, we welcome veteran TNRA contributor Josh Jackson for an hour long discussion on the truth and fictions of Germany in WWII. Josh is part German and currently lives in Germany, and today he joins the show to give his perspective on revisonist views of the Nazi era views which have become popular in recent years.

In particular we take a look at the internet film "The Greatest Story Never Told" which presents a revisionist view of Adolf Hitler and some key events of WWII.

In the 2nd hour we welcome motivational speaker Simon Treselyan, who brings us his perspective on the control and power structures of this world. Simon is a veteran of the UK Special Forces, and has a deep understanding of geo-politics and the way in which hidden elites steer the course of history.

Related Links

The genius of mass media mind control

November 29, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
November 29, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

05 December 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ John Pilger, Media Lies ]

Malcolm X Quote on Media Power

In today's show we examine the way in which media acts as an effective tool of government social engineering. We bring you a recent conference featuring the iconic journalist John Pilger, talking about the way in which the power in modern society is intertwined and indistinguishable from the corporate media which acts as its mouthpiece.

John Pilger points out that the elite power structure extends into the way in which journalism is taught in universities, creating a whole culture of trained servants of the prevailing world order. He further explains how the concept of  "censorship by omission" is essential in understanding the way in which corporate journalists sub-consciously collaborate with the propaganda memes of governments and corporations.

In hour 2 we bring you an interview with lawyer Rochelle Macredie who is involved in helping people suffering from mental illness to preserve their rights and dignity in the face of increasingly draconian legislation granting officials the power to have people involuntantarily committed and forcibly medicated with brain damaging drugs.

Related Links

Announcing TNRA Gift Subscriptions

28 November 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ TNRA ]

Why not give somebody the gift of TRUTH this Christmas?

You can now purchase a TNRA Gift Subscription via our website. Your nominated recipient will receive our unique t-shirt and resource DVD + a one year free pass to all our ad-free content.

You can also opt to send the gift anonymously!

Click here to learn more!

Exploring misconceptions on health and vaccines with Dr. Viera Scheibner

November 22, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
November 22, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

26 November 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Vaccination, Viera Scheibner ]

Today it is my great pleasure to welcome Dr. Viera Scheibner to the show. 

Dr. Scheibner's work is well known in Australia by vaccine safety campaigners, and she has often appeared in mainstream news coverage of vaccine controversies.

From her website:

Dr Viera Scheibner is Principal Research Scientist (Retired) with a doctorate in Natural Sciences from Comenius University in Bratislava. After an eminent scientific career in micropalaeontology during which she published 3 books and some 90 scientific papers in refereed scientific journals in Australia and overseas, she studied babies’ breathing patterns with the Cotwatch breathing monitor developed by her late husband Leif Karlsson in the mid 1980s. Babies had alarms after vaccination, indicating stress. This introduced her to the subject of vaccination. She then started systematically studying orthodox medical papers dealing with vaccination issues. To this day she has collected and studied more than 100000 pages of medical papers.


Despite such extensive research of orthodox medical papers published on vaccines over the past 100 years, she established that there is no scientific evidence that these injections of highly noxious substances prevent diseases, quite to the contrary, that they increase susceptibility to the diseases which the vaccines are supposed to prevent and also to a host of related and unrelated viral and bacterial infections. Vaccines are involved in a great number of modern ills of childhood such as immunoreactive diseases (asthma, allergies), autoimmune diseases (diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosis), cancers, leukaemia, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, behavioural and learning problems, to mention just the most important conditions.

In our discussion today we examine some vaccine safety concerns, and Dr. Scheibner explains how we can stay healthy without injesting or injecting harmful synthetic antibiotics and medicines.

In the first hour of the show we look at the socio-political implications of the full legalisation of marijuana which seems to be on the cards soon. We bring you an extended clip from a speech by Aldous Huxley from 1962, which highlights the risks to human freedom by allowing the State to engineer social control through the use of mind altering drugs.

Related Links

Bob Carter exposes misinformation and untruths in the latest IPCC Synthesis Report

November 15, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
November 15, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

24 November 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Bob Carter, Climate Change ]

Professor Bob CarterToday in the 2nd hour we welcome Professor Bob Carter back to the show.

Prof. Carter is one of Australia's most prominent scientific dissidents challenging the alleged consensus that human produced CO2 emissions are causing a climate catastrophe on our planet. Prof. Carter is a palaeontologist, stratigrapher and marine geologist and was head of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University from 1981 to 1998. He is an expert in paleo-climate which is the study of planetary climate over many millions of years.

In today's discussion, Prof. Carter examines some of the claims in the latest IPCC Synthesis Report and the way this has been covered in the mainstream news.

In the first hour we bring you our unique coverage of breaking news stories, including an interview with Markus Forest of Aussie Beach TV who was reporting live from the G20 in Brisbane.

Related Links

Page 1 of 108 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments

Link to freeze point table is broken by comment formatting. Paste the whole next line to browser:

dimitrxe.pp.fi/pub/pol/chem/pages/Persistent Contrail.html

By Josh on 2015 01 23 - 06:11:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett wrote:

“You have never refuted any claims you have simply disagreed with them.”

Are you saying you have not checked the references I provided?


“Saturation of a parcel of air is 100% moisture when the temperature is at dew point”

Again you are ignoring saturation with respect to ice which is not the same as saturation with respect to water. You want to look at the frost point, not the dew point.

Supersaturation with respect to ice can be reached at RH levels of 70 percent and less. Have a look at this table - are you saying it’s wrong?


“The burning of carbon based fuels does not create water, the water is there all the time”

You are leaving the ground of school-grade chemistry. I have already provided you twice with the chemical equation for kerosene combustion in a jet engine.

For the third time:

2 * C12H26 + 37 * O2—-> 24 * CO2 + 26 * H2O

By the way, here is the benzene combustion in your car - every time the engine runs it creates water:

2 * C6H6 + 15 * O2—-> 12 * CO2 + 6 * H2O

In case you did not notice, the H2O molecules are water. Which is newly created by the combustion.
Again, not my invention, it’s basic chemistry. If you’re saying these equations are wrong, then where are your’s?


“If you cannot tell the difference in altitude between an aircraft flying at 30,000 feet and one at 15,000 feet you should really see an optometrist”

That’s not what you have claimed. You described a contrail at around 10 degrees above the horizon and said you determined the altitude to be 10000 feet - with your bare eyes. You did not mention any plane.

Here is what you wrote:

“[...] I took 4 [photographs] today at midday showing two distinct chemtrails at about 10,000 feet near our home at Enoggera near Brisbane, which were about 2,000 feet above some scattered fair weather cumulus cloud”

I had provided a reference to a scientific study that determined the maximum distance for stereo viewing at 160 meters. I won’t quote it again, it’s all on the previous page.

Bottom line is that you have not shown how you could determine the altitude of these contrails as 10000 ft with your bare eyes. Do you know of any other pilot who would believe you?

By Josh on 2015 01 23 - 05:32:31
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

God I’m sick of these dismissive hit pieces with nothing more to offer than an attempt at a boot in the ‘gonads’ at a wholly ambiguous collective. “Sandy Hook trutherism is unforgivable” is it ? Whatever else Sandy Hook was it was a media extravaganza with an agenda and people are entitled to respond to it as such without being turned into parahias.
——————————-
Kathy C | Seller Support Team Manager at Westpac

By Kathy C on 2015 01 23 - 04:50:26
From the entry 'Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!'.

She is shallow, unintelligent, scheming, passive aggressive. I wouldnt be suprised if Wills wanted to get shot of her, but in a round about way was just forced into marriage with her because he had never been given the opportunity to play the scene. Here was safe. Hand picked for safe. Boring, smug, shallow kate.
——————————-
Sophie Hackett | Manager at <a >Bank of Melbourne</a>

By Sophie Hackett on 2015 01 23 - 04:44:58
From the entry 'Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!'.

These are great tips! Thanks so much for putting the spotlight on "no plane" and "video fakery" theories!
---------------------
Matilda Barratt | Seller Support Team Manager at St George Bank

By Nancy Barratt on 2015 01 23 - 04:35:03
From the entry 'For those who are on the fence about "No Planes" & "Video Fakery" Theories'.

Leonard Clampett wrote about me:
As an amateur he claims to be more informed than I, as a professional
As I have said several times before - credentials are irrelevant if you don’t get your facts straight. You still have not issued any comments regarding your earlier claims after I have refuted them.
Did you change your stance on supersaturation with respect to ice?
Does it exist and is it a commonly occurring phenomenon as atmospheric science says?
Does one tonne of jet fuel generate roughly 1.3 tonnes of water when combusted?
Isn’t it basic chemistry that burning of any hydrocarbon fuel creates water?
Have you accepted that you can’t determine the altitude of a contrail just by using your stereoscopic view?
By Josh on 2014 12 30 - 08:22:05

Credentials from scientists therefore cannot be relevant if you don’t believe their facts are correct. Is that correct Joshnonymous? Who is the arbiter?
You have never refuted any claims you have simply disagreed with them. You are not right simply because you think you are.
Saturation of a parcel of air is when cloud forms. You can see this occurring in the sky above you on most days. Saturation of a parcel of air is 100% moisture when the temperature is at dew point. Supersaturation in clear air can occur when the water in exhaust emissions from an aircraft at altitude, in the right ambient conditions, condense after being turned to gas in the high temperatures in the can (combustion chamber). When this condensate is left to its own devices it takes up the temperature of the surrounding air and evaporates as the water content fuses into the surrounding drier air. This can take a few minutes but certainly not linger and become cloud as you claim. Otherwise we need just fly a few aircraft around to make cloud and dispense with droughts. That has been tried and does not work for obvious scientific reasons. If the surrounding air was saturated their would be cloud already. The difference between contrails that disappear within a kilometre or two behind an aircraft and those that remain for many minutes is caused by the variance in the humidity. You never see the contrails emitted in cloud do you? Meteorology 101. You get to understand all this in the senior examination studies but not in the hobby pilot exams.
The burning of carbon based fuels does not create water, the water is there all the time, and the aircraft does not carry 1.3 times its fuel load into the upper atmosphere. Weight and balance tables will tell you that. Load data sheets tell you that. The operations crew who load and fuel the aircraft will tell you that. The pilots know that because they do not take off overweight, otherwise their TOLD cards would be wrong every time. The extra water comes from the air masses that are compressed by the engines as they fly through the air masses.
If you cannot tell the difference in altitude between an aircraft flying at 30,000 feet and one at 15,000 feet you should really see an optometrist, or better still an ophthalmologist, the ones I see every year to have my eyes thoroughly checked in accordance with the legislation so provided.
Have a good day.

By Leonard Clampett on 2015 01 22 - 20:55:52
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

まずは|素晴らしいと言う私がしたいと私がしたいブログ!私は簡単な質問を持っていた心|私はあなたがいないをすればそうでない場合は、聞きしたいのですが、その。 自分の考えあなた自身とクリアを中央にどのように  見つけるために知っている前書き込み私がいた。 私がしたいた困難な時期|アイデアを得ることに私のクリア思考の心を出。 失われた無駄な 私は本当にない|書き込みしかし、それはでの喜びを取る楽しむちょうど最初の10〜15分のように思える単純に開始する方法を把握しよう。どれアイデアまたはヒント? おかげ!

By ugg ブーツ 店舗 大阪 on 2015 01 22 - 20:30:46
From the entry 'War monger Tony Abbott recklessy accuses the Russian President over downed passenger plane'.

Amazed: Hereward isn’t saying anything here about 100% free speech, only pointing out that the people who rule have double standards: upholding the right of one group to freedom of speech, but not to another. Thus your argument is irrelevant to the subject. Unless you’re suggesting that because 100% free speech is undesirable (according to you), it’s ok for this situation to occur?

By zek on 2015 01 22 - 01:00:55
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

If Hereward believed in 100% speech, then he would have left everyone alone on his 9/11 forum.
There is a line to speech. What most are saying, without saying it now days is, they want their right to offend other people. Does Hereward call Jews “kikes” or Negro’s “nigger”? Or allow other people on his site to use those words? No of course not. There is no such thing as 100% “free” speech. If it were “free”, then we could say any and everything to any and everyone.

By Amazed on 2015 01 20 - 18:15:06
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

people all over the world know about chemtrails..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoLwclSjaro

there is plenty of evidence. josh and fenton just say ... no no no no no…

they offer NOTHING!

By yryk on 2015 01 20 - 12:42:01
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Categories