Mandatory vaccination - myth and reality
Posted: August 6th, 2009
Tonight, with news reports of mass vaccination programs around the world, we look at the question of mandatory vaccination, and try to peel back the layers of obfuscation from governments and news sources. We look at the issue of your rights and whether the media is engaged in deceiving us about what those rights really are.
The screen grab shown below demonstrates that the incidence of flu this year is well down on past years:
Google Flu Trends Australia 2008-2009
We examine the ongoing “Ute-gate” saga. With a key figure in the controversy, Godwin Grech, now in a mental hospital after allegedly confessing to “faking” an email the question arises whether this man has been pushed to the brink because he knows too much.
We then take a look at the recent arrests in Melbourne over an alleged “terrorism plot”. These arrests have all the appearance of another government sanctioned “problem - reaction - solution” paradigm.
Flu shot controversy in New Jersey
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekyS6SYc8Fc
Posted: August 6th, 2009 under Uncategorized.
Comments
Comment from Tom Bowden
Time August 6, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Geez, you guys waffle on. Waking Australia up is a mission impossible as it is, get to the point.
Comment from C. Smith
Time August 7, 2009 at 2:17 am
It seems as tho this whole terror plot is not much more then the media using scare tactics to let everyone know its even easyer to charge someone for a crime that are yet to commit or even possibly consider.
Comment from C. Smith
Time August 7, 2009 at 2:22 am
Also great show guys, keep it up.
In my opinion, theres not a single word thats said on this show thats the slightest bit waffley.
Comment from Hereward
Time August 7, 2009 at 9:56 am
Hey thanks C. Smith - glad you are enjoying it.
Comment from Digger
Time August 27, 2009 at 1:06 am
When you talk about the issue of Terrorism, and the vagueness of what defines the term, i.e ‘enter a state with the intent of committing a hostile act’. I wonder how many people are aware of what Australia defines as a ‘Terrorist’ so I am going to give an excerpt from the AATA (Australian Anti-Terrorism Act) 2005.
* Potential for preventive detention: short term detention for named individuals: without evidence; and without criminal involvement; the detainee may be interrogated by Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO); disclosing that an individual has been so detained or interrogated is, in almost all circumstances, a crime.
* Control orders: Potential for almost unlimited restrictions on named individuals: freedom of movement; freedom of association (including one’s lawyer); banning the performing of named actions and owning named items, including actions and things necessary to earn a living; unlimited requirements to be, or not to be, at specified places at any or all times of the day and week; wear a tracking device; and including encouragement to submit to re-education. These restrictions are referred to as “control orders”, and may be granted for a period of one year before review.
* Significant restrictions on the right of any citizen to express certain opinions: including criticism, or “urging disaffection”, of the sovereign, the constitution, the government, the law, or ‘different groups’; exemptions may exist where the target of criticism is agreed to be ‘in error’; exemptions appear to exist where the claim is that a feature of a group of people is in some way offensive to the mainstream of society; onus of proof of goodwill is on the defendant - the presumption is not of innocence.
* It becomes a crime, punishable by life imprisonment, to recklessly provide funds to a potential terrorist: funds include money and equivalents and also assets; it is not necessary that the culprit know the receiver is a potential terrorist, only that they are reckless about the possibility; it is not even necessary that the receiver is a terrorist, only that the first person is reckless about the possibility that they might be.
* Police can request information from any source about any named person: any information about the person’s travel, residence, telephone calls, financial transactions amongst other information; professional privilege does not apply; it can be an offence to disclose that such documents have been obtained.
* A legislative provision for ‘hoax offences’ will create a more serious charge for people who cause chaos for the public and emergency services by dreaming up devastating terrorist-inspired hoaxes.
Comment from Digger
Time August 27, 2009 at 1:13 am
Sorry I know that was long, but notice how vague and open-ended most of these points are? I suggest that any member of society could be a so-called ‘named’ individual, and be found guilty of one or more of these crimes. I think that the point of the act is not so much to protect, but to criminalise the entire nation.
Comment from STOP THE VAX
Time August 30, 2009 at 11:34 am
Vaccines are POISON. The only one[s] who benefit from vaccines are PHARMACEUTICALS. Lots of Vitamin D will protect you from the flu and many other diseases. DON’T be fooled by paid off media hype. STOP the sickening assault on humanity.
Comment from sandra407
Time September 10, 2009 at 1:56 am
Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. 
Cheers! Sandra. R.
Comment from angelina jolie
Time September 11, 2009 at 2:10 am
I love your site. Love design!!! I just came across your blog and wanted to say that I
Comment from megan fox
Time September 12, 2009 at 1:39 am
Sign: umsun Hello!!! rcuwwymhyw and 3830ssgfhphzye and 5920Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post
Comment from Sabretruthtiger
Time September 20, 2009 at 2:18 am
This is nothing more than an abuse of rights. It’ a draconian New World Order plan to spread disease and genetic disorders as quickly as possible to create a weak, sick, scared population that’ll let them pass laws of quarantine, internment and martial law, cementing their control as they implement a One World Government. Fact! They have no moral right to command what goes into our bodies or the bodies of our children!
Comment from Sabretruthtiger
Time September 20, 2009 at 2:20 am
They always test out the waters with a law that tramples our rights to see if they can get away with it, this will spread to the entire Western world if they think it will be accepted.
Comment from Sabretruthtiger
Time September 20, 2009 at 2:27 am
You’re correct about the recent terror arrests. Anybody with an IQ above 10 realises these were staged in order to broaden the classifications of terrorism, fairly soon any civilian groups voicing discontent against the govt will be arrested and detained without trial.
Comment from megan fox wallpaper
Time November 21, 2009 at 3:13 am
Sign: dgcph Hello!!! xkgdg and 9799atmchqdyxf and 1291 : Nice blog!
Comment from zen
Time December 17, 2009 at 7:52 am
what a great channel mate, I am so pleased something like your site is happening in Australia. keep up the good work. with love and strength to you all.
Comment from ridwanzero
Time December 29, 2009 at 7:51 pm
This is nothing more than an abuse of rights. It’ a draconian New World Order plan to spread disease and genetic disorders as quickly as possible to create a weak, sick, scared population that’ll let them pass laws of quarantine, internment and martial law, cementing their control as they implement a One World Government. Fact! They have no moral right to command what goes into our bodies or the bodies of our children!…………
onlineuniversalwork
Comment from Directorio Web
Time June 28, 2010 at 4:32 am
Directorio Seo y Posicionamiento Web Directorio con enlaces válidos.
Saludos
Comment from black celebs
Time August 11, 2010 at 4:36 am
Sign: wdpad Hello!!! avqvp and 287xhgyfaaahu and 7102 : Great Blog!
Comment from celebrity fuck you
Time August 25, 2010 at 4:33 am
Sign: zdbrw Hello!!! prqfz and 4286ewasvcgnup and 3821 : Cooooool blog really
Comment from Peaky Ramone
Time August 6, 2009 at 3:21 pm
I enjoy your programs. Thank you. Keep it up.
But I sense a bit of your own spin in this presentation when you keep referring to Godwin Grech now being in a “mental asylum”. That’s dramatically emotive language to use.