LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!
Most Popular
Fracked to death: how gas companies and their government sponsors are poisoning our drinking water
Explaining coal seam gas and its extraction (Source)
Today's show reveals the shocking truth about the toxic, and one might say, genocidal effects of Coal Seam Gas, which is now spreading like a cancer throughout the country in both rural and urban environments.
My guest in the second hour is Wanda from northern New South Wales, who has been fighting on the frontline of this war against humanity. Recently she chained herself to a drilling rig as part of a protest against gas drilling in her region.
As we noted in a previous show, Coal Seam Gas drilling is coming to Sydney soon, and those who think that this is just a problem for a few unlucky rural folk have a rude shock coming.
During our interview we present a range of information about the destructive effects of this technology on both the environment and human health.
In the first hour of the show we take a look at the meaning of the word "democracy" with our guest Dan Collins.
Related Links
- Lock the Gate Alliance
- Water, salt and carbon in the coal seam gas future
- Fracking back on the table after AGL reversed a pledge not to use the controversial drilling technique in the suburbs
- Republic vs Democracy (Youtube)
Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!
You know what worries me even more than the predatory agenda of the ruling elites?
It's the tendency of truthers to fall into line like lemmings on any given conspiracy, to engage in mass group think and, even worse, the readiness to leap to defammatory accusations about people whom they know nothing about.
This really worries me, because with friends like this, who needs enemies? People with this psychological tendency could turn on anyone (including their comrades) in a heartbeat, merely because of some allegation or innuendo put forth by a smooth talking youtube vlogger.
This type of thing has happened in past revolutions by the way, resulting in purges of alleged "counter-revolutionaries" who were often the best, most honest and genuine. It happened in the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution.
For the record, I do NOT believe the mainstream narrative on Sandy Hook. As for the conspiracy claims, I don't believe them either.
Actually I don't believe any supplied narrative. I look for facts, which are provable. I believe in my own ability to discern truth from fiction, if there is enough information. If there is not enough information on a given subject, I refrain from making strong assertions.
I have questions and concerns about Sandy Hook, but they don't lead to the kind of accusations which are now rampant on the internet.
I think accusing grieving family members of being actors without a shred of evidence other than your own dubious gut feeling is sick, pathetic and stupid.
I'm ashamed to be associated with people who think like this. Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!
Related Links
3 way discussion on guns, your rights and the Nanny State
President Obama's attempt to "get tough" on gun control has provoked a massive backlash from the patriot community in the US who are sworn to uphold the 2nd amendment at all costs, even if that means civil war.
On today's show we take a long hard look at some of the key questions in the debate over gun ownership and what the implications are for the stability of the United States and the world.
My guests are regular TNRA contributors John Bursill and Josh Jackson. Our discussion ranges through many issues which affect Australia. Questions considered include the following:
- Is there a real possibility of civil war in America?
- What will Australia's future be if US power collapses?
- Can an armed general population hope to shake off an invader or tyrannical government?
- What sort of weapons are needed?
- Is there a viable alternative to the use of force?
- Is peaceful revolution possible?
Related Links
Lies and cover-ups by the Australian national broadcaster exposed by Chris Graham
Today, in the second hour, we welcome journalist Chris Graham to the show. Chris is the founding editor of the National Indigenous Times and the recipient of the prestigious Walkley Award for Excellence in Indigenous Affairs reporting.
In the course of our interview Chris documents a range of unethical and downright deceitful practices engaged by ABC Lateline in their coverage of a scandal which indirectly led to the highy controversial and despised NT Intervention.
The "intervention" as it's now simply called, was a combination of draconian changes to the law and unprecendented law enforcement measures enacted in 2007, including roll back of the Native Title Act, quarantining of welfare benefits and deployment of 600 soldiers from the Australian Defence Forces in remote communites in the Northern Territories. The measures were spurred by claims of rampant sexual abuse in remote Aboriginal communities which had first appeared on ABC television's Lateline program in 2006.
During tonight's interview Chris steps us through his research which shows conclusively that senior ABC producers engaged in distortion of facts, wanton fabrication of evidence, and used testimony of informants who were clearly lying.
Such practices are of course all too common at the ABC, as regular listeners to this show will know. As with the biased reporting and cheap attacks on the character of Schapelle Corby's family, the one-sided coverage of the Syrian conflict or the suppression of critical evidence concerning the 9/11 terrorist attacks, this shocking story adds weight to the case for radically overhauling or even dismantling the ABC which has flagrantly breached its charter so many times.
In the first hour of today's show we give you a different perspective on the question of accesibility of assault weapons in the US in the wake of Alex Jones' highly controversial appearance on CNN with Piers Morgan.
I hope you enjoy the show!
Related Links
The pharmacracy exposed, with Thomas Szasz
In the second hour of today's show we bring you some audio clips from the late Dr. Thomas Szasz, psychiatrist, philosopher and intellectual giant of the modern era.
Szasz was well known for his critique of biochemical reductionism in psychiatry, but it is interesting to note that he was also a libertarian who passionately believed in the concept of self-ownership and the rights of the individual. Szasz did not see any legitimacy in the the way the State regulates our access to drugs, and the lectures we bring you today highlight some of his ideas in this area.
Inasmuch as we have words to describe medicine as a healing art,
but have none to describe it as a method of social control or political rule,
we must first give it a name. I propose that we call it pharmacracy, from the
Greek roots pharmakon, for ‘medicine' or ‘drug,' and kratein, for ‘to rule' or
‘to control.' ... As theocracy is rule by God or priests, and democracy is rule
by the people or the majority, so pharmacracy is rule by medicine or physicians.--Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts, and Pushers,
by Thomas Szasz, (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1974), p. 139.)
More information on this topic can be found in the book Our Right to Drugs: The Case for a Freemarket.
In the first hour of the show we review some of the key themes which preoccupy TNRA, and take a close look at draconian changes to the family benefit which will save the government vast amounts of money. We propose that these changes were needed in order to fund the celebrated carbon tax compensations doled out to low income Australians last year.
Well, the money had to come from somewhere!
Related Links
- Thomas Szasz: The Right to Take Drugs
- Thomas Szasz on Socialism in Health Care
- Dr Thomas Szasz, who has died aged 92, was an indefatigable critic of conventional psychiatry
- Welfare cuts to put 'pressure on charities'
- Putting single parents on Newstart when their youngest child turns eight will help get people into work: Jenny Macklin
- “I Want No Part of It Anymore” - Loren R. Mosher, M.D
Rochelle Macredie on the Sandy Hook massacre
My guest tonight is Rochelle Macredie, LLB, BSc, who joins us to expose discrepencies, anomalies and disinformation in the coverage of the Sandy Hook school shooting.
Rochelle's incisive intellect dissects many confusing strands of this story in an attempt to penetrate through the propaganda to work out what really happened and the agenda at work.
Rochelle provides solid facts which dispel some of the myths about the relationship between the availability of guns and homicide, and presents some shocking revelations about the connection between SSRI medications and aberrant behaviour.
Rochelle is a vegetarian and no gun enthusiast, nevertheless she is stridently opposed to gun bans. Why?
As Rochelle puts it: since government was the leading cause of death in the 20th century, handing our weapons back to the government may not be the best way to keep us all safe.
In the second hour I am joined by Damon Crowe, who brings us his perspective on 2012 and the Mayan connection.
Related Links
- In 1915 in Australia, the homicide rate was 1.8 per 100,000 population. In 1998 it was 1.6 per 100,000
- Australian Institute of Criminology - Homicide statistics
- The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information
- NRA issues blunt 'no' on gun control
- Agenda Prevails Over Truth | Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Restore Australia!
On today's show in the second hour we welcome Mike Holt of Restore Australia.
Restore Australia’s goal is to amend Section 128 of our Constitution to give all Australian voters, as well as the Parliament, the right to initiate a referendum to amend the Constitution.
Why should we do this?
"We are tired of the government taking no notice of the people. We want more say. The Voters are looking for change. Now is the time to re-assert the sovereignty of the People and take control of the manner in which we are governed."
In the first hour of the show we bring you a variety of stories including some breaking news regarding Schapelle Corby, who is to be the subject of a telemovie in 2013.
We also take a look at recent developments in the Peter Slipper sexual harrassment case and reflect on what this indicates about the level of corruption in government these days.
Related Links
Australia - the new capital of the New World Order?
Today I'm joined in studio by Damon Crowe for a general discussion about the quality of life in Australia and the way in which our society has been swallowed up by the forces of international homogenisation and enslavement.
We look at the cost of living, sky rocketing property prices, and the corporatist, centralised style of government which is now well entrenched in Australia, and the many ways in which the well intentioned "battler" is being crushed by banks.
Damon also shares with us some of his research into the work of William Dean Garner, author of "Who Really Owns Your Gold", on the Jesuits and the control of the international monetary system.
Related Links
Radiation expert Don Maisch on the health risks of smart meters
Today we are joined in the first hour by Dr. Don Maisch, the founder of EMFacts Consultancy, which has produced a wide range of reports and papers dealing with various health issues related to human exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
From the website:
This website was established in 1997 as an independent source of information on the possible health and safety issues arising from human exposure to Electromagnetic Energy (EME).
This consists of both 50 and 60 Hertz (Hz) Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) from our use of electricity and Radio-frequency/Microwave (RF/MW) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) from telecommunications.
This site is designed to be utilized as a resource by individuals, groups, organisations and communities who are trying to em power themselves by gaining a better understanding of the complex issues involved with this important environmental issue.
In the second hour we enter into a wide ranging discussion on the pros and cons of technology. Every new invention is a two edged sword which can either help to liberate and empower humanity or be used to injure and enslave us.
Josh Jackson joins us for the full hour to discuss these ideas and their implications.
Related Links
- EMFacts - Mobile/Cell Phone Radiation | Health Effects & Safety
- Cancer Concerns - Stateline Tasmania (ABC Radio)
- PhD Dissertation by Don Maisch
- ‘Cypherpunks’: New Assange book says Internet may enslave us
- A United Nations report says the world's permafrost is beginning to thaw
- Government to get new software to spy on social media conversations
Interview with Hanadi Assoud
A selection of mainstream news images demonstrating that many of the so-called missiles landing in Israel are lacking warheads.
Today my guest is Hannadi Assoud from "Hands off Syria", an Australian group which is staunchly opposed to any foreign intervention in Syria. Hannadi talks to us about the history of the conflict, its real causes and the ultimate agenda which drives those who are seeking to topple the Syrian government.
We also bring you some interesting research into the Gaza rocket attacks on Israel, which illustrates that the threat represented by these munitions is grossly exaggerated by the Israeli government.
Related Links
- Syria Islamist fighters in Aleppo reject new opposition
- Gaza’s ‘Long-Range Rockets’ Just Regular Rockets Without Explosives
- Dissecting IDF Propaganda: The Numbers behind the rocket attacks
- Fajr-5 missile gives Palestinians rare if short-lived advantage
- Fajr 5: five times the range of home-made rockets
- Rockets stripped of explosives to fly further?
Recent Comments
So, Leonard Clampett, you have just been shown how persistent contrails are formed.
Why are you pasting this crazy stuff now? Copy/Paste does not magically generate truth. That weird text is all over the net.
There is no evidence that persistent contrails are anything but persistent contrails - so, no chemtrails there.
Can you show us “these nano-technology/electrical responders”? No?
How then do you know that what you pasted is not totally bunk?
By Josh on 2013 03 01 - 04:39:47
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Hi M and K,this was posted this morning,24/01, on Max Igan’s FB wall,thought you may be interested.It’s not new news, but some may be unaware of the link between Fluoride and Chemtrails.
Very early this morning I received a message from a friend, a software designer who has worked extensively with DNA mapping, most especially mitochondrial DNA. She had just watched my latest film Trance-Formation for the first time. I thought I would share her comments with you all…
This is what she sent me…
Her: I haven’t gone to sleep yet and I just saw Trance-Formation. It blew my mind!!! If your still up, I reckon I can tell you EXACTLY what the NWO plan is and it’s all got to do with our DNA, in particular Mitochondrial DNA and they have known about this since at least 1952. This system has to be brought down yesterday!
Her: Eukarya is one of the three kingdoms that make up the total biological life for humans.This is the kingdom that is responsible for the creation of mitochondrial DNA and mitochondrial DNA is the DNA that provides the energy (battery), contains the DNA code to produce DNA material (such as proteins, enzymes, cells etc.) and is responsible for the regeneration and repair of DNA in general. Those unknown/unidentified fibres that Sophia Smallstorm talks about, have the same structure as those identified found in the Eukarya biological region of the human body.
Her: Guess what Fluoride destroys? It destroys Mitochondrial DNA at even minuscule levels. I part in 30 million destroys mitochondrial DNA which is the architect/building block for all our cells and the body.
Her: They’ve known about this since at least 1952. We’re being prepped & primed for the introduction of Transhumanism. Chemtrails introduce nano-technology/electrical responders, the wireless technology send the code/signal instructions, and the implant of the RFID chip will be the CPU where the signals/information and pulse can be controlled (switched on/off. Add that to the free energy from carbon film (the free energy film; we are all made of carbon, which is an energy store that can be switched on or off according to this new fee energy technology, reduce the body’s resistance through immunisations, and destroy the factory that reproduces and renews the body’s cells through water fluoridation and the NWO plan all fits nicely into place!!!
Me: You got it
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 01 26 - 10:54:14
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Hello Hereward ~ I too require solid evidence before I can take on any theory. Someone sent me this (lengthy) document sometime ago written by a Major in the US airforce researching the use of cloud seeding & its evolution from its beginnings in WW11 right through to 2030.
It is an unclassified document that admits to everything including the methods & chemicals used & the militarys involvement in these operations & why. It makes one wonder what the classified version would look like
It can be viewed on my Google Drive account here ~ https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxcFD5v21Uh7b1Aya2E5S3MzQlk
By tinsel777 on 2013 01 02 - 16:53:38
From the entry 'Chemtrails Revisited'.
I was insulted by the remarks Hereward made towards so called “creationists” and that by bringing them on his show it would be less scientific (“like the UFO community”). I would recommend everyone watch the presentaion called “100 reasons why evolution is stupid” by Dr Kent Hovind. I DARE Hereward to debate this man on ANYTHING scientific. By the way this man is in jail serving a ten year jail sentence in a maximum security prison for “failing” to pay his taxes. Oh and hes an ex science teacher turned reverend.
Hereward never dares to mention the foremost documentaries “Why/How in the world are they spraying” nor does he ever try to look at any of the FACTS associated with those presentaions. He dares to mention the scientific method yet states in the description that his presentaion is just the opinion of “two regular guys with basic education”.
Hey Hereward why do I have to “SUBMIT’(which means to beg) and “REGISTER” (which defines ownership of the registered) my person in order to post on your site, havent you watched any documentaries on lawful and legal differences like “Bursting bubbles of government deception” or books like “The classified files” (Thomas Anderson) and “How I clobbered every cash confiscatory agency known to man” (Mary Croft).
Thank you for your time.
By Phesage on 2012 12 23 - 20:36:31
From the entry 'Chemtrails Revisited'.
Leonard Clampett,
did you have a look into the studies that confirm supersaturation as the precondition for persistant contrails?
If you still don’t accept the existence of this phenomenon, I suggest you phrase your objections in a letter to the authors of the papers I linked previously.
The most prominent of the authors are probably Professor Hoskins of Reading University and Professor Dr.-Ing. Ulrich Schumann from the DLR (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt).
What do you think is the reason for all these scientist to incorporate supersaturation in their daily research work?
By Josh on 2012 12 12 - 04:04:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett said:
“Your calculation does not take account of the entire air mass moving through the engine. It cannot simply be ignored. 1 tonne of fuel and 58.82 tonnes of atmosphere compressed and burned equals 59.82 tonnes”
My calculation takes into account the elements that are directly involved in the combustion process. Obviously, to retrieve that 3.47 tonnes of oxygen, a lot of air has to go through the combustion chamber. But most of it is not involved in the combustion.
All this does not alter the fact that the combustion of 1 ton of fuel generates 1.37 tonnes of water that wasn’t in the atmosphere before.
By Josh on 2012 12 11 - 09:29:50
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
is my calculation correct?
If so, then for every tonne of fuel there are 1.37 tonnes of water generated.
If not, please point out the error.
By Josh on 2012 12 10 - 20:54:21
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh, by golly, I think you almost have it. A little extra stretching and presto. You are now getting toward understanding. I spoke with a professor chemistry and she agrees with me that only 1 tonne of fuel residue is exhausted from an engine following combustion of that 1 tonne, along with 58.82 tonnes of resultant matter from the compressed air that goes through the engine adding up to a total of 59.82 tonnes exhausted from the combustion process.
Josh Anonymous said”
“If you break down the relations to one tonne of fuel you get this:
1.00 t fuel and 3.47 t oxygen going in, 3.10 t carbondioxyde plus 1.37 t water coming out.
4.47 tonnes in, 4.47 tonnes out.”
Interesting Josh! I think you stumbled across the fact that fuel does not burn by itself earlier in the discussion. Your calculation does not take account of the entire air mass moving through the engine. It cannot simply be ignored. 1 tonne of fuel and 58.82 tonnes of atmosphere compressed and burned equals 59.82 tonnes of which a very small portion is water. The water was always there in the atmosphere, and came from OUTSIDE the aircraft and was heated by the combustion process, turned to steam , exhausted and condensed.
The point being - the extra weight comes from OUTSIDE. Duh!
Air is a mixture of gases
Oxygen: 20.99%
Nitrogen: 78.03%
Carbon Dioxide: 0.03%
Hydrogen: 0.00005%
Argon: 0.93%
Neon: 0.0018%
Helium: 0.0005%
Krypton: 0.0001%
Xenon: 0.000009%
= 99.982459%
Concerning Carbon Dioxide. Did you ever see the effect of having dry ice, solid carbon dioxide, in a punch bowl at a party? The dry ice is vaporising to the gaseous state, as well as condensing some water vapour in the air to produce a white fog that sinks in the air. It flows over the edge of the bowl and sinks. This shows that the carbon dioxide and cold water vapour are more dense than air. i.e. they sink. This should tell a wide awake observer that CO2, being 1.5 times the weight of air, descends when released at altitude and will not remain there to become a cloud. This is why you see real contrails that dissolve in a very short time apart from the well known fact that natures equilibrium ensures the universe remains in an overall steady state.
The ratio of fuel to air mixture for a jet engine at sea level is about 58.82 to 1, i.e. 1 tonne of fuel mixed with 58.82 tonnes of air, will emit 59.82 tonnes of hot gas which will contain a proportion of water that existed in the mixture in the first place.
A friend of mine called me yesterday from mid NSW as he was driving from Narrabri to Melbourne to tell me that he was looking at a peculiar chemtrail in the sky west of where he was parked on the highway. A circle with two crossed chemtrails situated to make it look a skull and crossbones. That is not done by either commercial or Air Force jet traffic and it would appear that as the powers-that-be have sufficient deniers like yourselves now so they believe they can do whatever they like with impunity as you assist in dividing the community with your belief that governments would never do such things to We, The People.
Josh, chemtrails are being sprayed across the globe every day. Get used to it. Any amount of information is available for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. No amount of denial will change that and arguing against it assists the agenda.
By Leonard Clampett on 2012 12 10 - 20:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett said:
“You claim that 1 tonne of fuel is converted into 1.3 tonnes of water”
Don’t forget the other substances - else the equation will indeed not add up.
Let’s add molcular masses and you will see how it works out. First, here is the combustion equation again:
2 C12H26 + 37 O2 = 24 CO2 + 26 H2O
Molecular mass of kerosene: 170.3360 g/mol
Molecular mass of an oxygen pair: 31.99886 g/mol
Molecular mass of carbondioxide: 44.00964 g/mol
Molecular mass of water: 18.01532
(All rounded)
So, the mass going into combustion is:
2 * 170.3360 + 37 * 31.99886 = 340.672 + 1183.95782 = 1524.62982 g/mol
The mass coming out of the combustion is:
24 * 44.00964 + 26 * 18.01532 = 1056.23136 + 468.39832 = 1524.62968 g/mol
The total mass is unchanged (apart from th rounding errors).
If you break down the relations to one ton of fuel you get this:
1.00 t fuel and 3.47 t oxygen going in, 3.10 t carbondioxyde plus 1.37 t water coming out.
4.47 tonnes in, 4.47 tonnes out.
If there are errors in the calculation, point them out please.
Ask your engineer friend about the combustion formula if you think it’s wrong.
By Josh on 2012 12 09 - 18:46:17
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh, Now, let me make sure I have this straight. You claim that 1 tonne of fuel is converted into 1.3 tonnes of water. Correct so far? Yes. I suggest that you keep up your subscription to the Flat Earth Society as they need the money and their membership has been dwindling for decades, even a century or two. What I can let you in on, is the fact that after an aircraft passes by, any increase in the weight of the surrounding atmosphere, which would be the result of whatever the aircraft exhausted only, would exactly equal the weight of what was exhausted “and no more”. I iterate, “and no more”. Let me reiterate, “and no more”. The engines would not burn 1 tonne of fuel and exhaust 1.3 tonnes of anything, but 1 tonne of exhaust only. Can you see the finer picture here? Nothing disappears, nothing is added, as matter only alters form. This, of course, only occurs for a very short period of time as instantly, as in space, upon exhaust, the emission is subject to, and I have explained this to you a couple of times, immediate dispersal to balance the ambient atmospheric temperature, pressure and humidity. If the ambient temperature, pressure and humidity are less than the exhaust emissions, the emissions will be instantly subject to reduction to reach equilibrium. Got the larger picture yet?
I can go through it slowly for you if that is your need. However, to add to that, it seems you have difficulty following the very simple fact that as equilibrium is the arbiter of all things in nature, everything that is introduced into the upper atmosphere is absorbed by the surrounding atmosphere, which, at 30,000 feet, extends to hundreds, if not thousands of cubic kilometres, and temperature, pressure and humidity are equalised rapidly.
I believe you should get your machine that you claim creates more than is input, and sell it to the governments across the world so they can make money. Should be worth billions to you, and the best of luck.
Just another question for you, although, as you would studied and passed examinations on Principles of Flight for gliders, you may not have had to do propellers, but you should know anyway. Can you tell me if lift always equals weight, and thrust always equals drag, in balanced flight, in the formula to calculate these aerodynamic forces? The accepted belief in this matter will demonstrate to you the inherent difficulties in following the kind of dogma you keep flogging among other dead horses.
By Leonard Clampett on 2012 12 09 - 09:13:19
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.