Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

Latest LIVE show

Hereward Fenton

February 21, 2015
In March 2007 Australian David Hicks was convicted under US law on the single charge of 'providing material support for terrorism'. The successful prosecution… Get the podcast »

Listen Live or Call In !

Recent News & Podcasts

Introducing the International Common Law Court of Justice

March 14, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
March 14, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

31 March 2014 | Permalink | comments: 4
By Hereward Fenton

My guest today in the 2nd hour is Kevin Annett, co-founder of the International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ).

About ICLCJ:

Natural and Customary Law allows for the establishment of popular courts of justice when the existing legal and governmental authorities are subverting the law and justice, or aiding those who do. Common Law arose historically to uphold the liberties of the people against tyrants, whether religious or secular, and accordingly, has universal jurisdiction when convened as a jury court by more than twelve duly sworn men and women.

The International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) was established as the legal and judicial arm of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and state (ITCCS), with the help of legal experts, judges and survivors of church terror and imperial genocide in more than a dozen countries. (www.itccs.org)

My discussion with Rev. Annett covers many interesting questions on the application of common law as defined by his organisation.

In the first hour of the show we bring you a round-up of Australian news, and I'm joined by our producer Leah Shanley who gives us a sneak preview on the upcoming interviews planned for TNRA.

Related Links

Professor Bob Carter on the latest NIPCC report

March 1, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
March 1, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

06 March 2014 | Permalink | comments: 4
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Bob Carter, Climate Change, NIPCC ]

Bob CarterIn today's show we are joined by Professor Bob Carter for the entire second hour to discuss the findings contained in the latest NIPCC report.

The NIPCC ("Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change")  is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change from a sceptical viewpoint, looking at information which is routinely ignored by the official U.N. body, the IPCC.

The NIPCC was formed in response to the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report, released in 2007 with the aim of providing an independent, second opinion on the IPCC's findings. The first full report of the NIPCC was published in 2009. Another report followed in 2011, and the latest report was published in 2013.

The 2013 NIPCC report contains an Executive Summary and a Summary for Policy Makers which present the findings in an approachable way for general readers.

From the Summary For Policy Makers:

NIPCC’s conclusion, drawn from its extensive review of the scientific evidence, is that any human global
climate signal is so small as to be embedded within the background variability of the natural climate system and is not dangerous. At the same time, global temperature change is occurring, as it always naturally does. A phase of temperature stasis or cooling has succeeded the mild twentieth century warming. It is certain that similar natural climate changes will continue to occur.

In the show today, Professor Carter goes through some of the key findings in the latest report and addresses some popular misconceptions about polar ice and climate variability over the past ten thousand years.

In the first hour of the show we bring you some commentary and analysis on a number of other important news topics.

We take a look at the latest developments in the Schapelle Corby case, and we examine new revelations about the infiltration of the internet by the NSA and its worldwide affiliate organisations (including Australia's "Signals Directorate").

We also take a look at the recent work of Dr. William Pepper which has uncovered important information about the the building specifications for World Trade Center Building 7. Dr. Pepper has proven that the government research body NIST, which issued the official reports on the WTC collapse in 2001, provided factually incorrect blueprints of the building structure. The blueprints which NIST referred to in its report are missing vital structural elements which, if included, would have made their theory of a fire-induced collapse untenable.

Dr. Pepper has written to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Office of the Inspector General, demanding that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), be directed to produce a corrected analysis and report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, with the threat of litigation if this amendment is not made in a timely manner.

Related Links

 

Schapelle Corby is a political prisoner

February 19, 2014, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

25 February 2014 | Permalink | comments: 1
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Schapelle Corby ]

In today's show we look at the latest developments in the unfolding drama over Schapelle Corby's release and her plans to give an interview on Channel 7.

We examine the real reasons behind the Australian Federal Police raid on the offices of Channel 7 which was ostensibly in relation to enforcing the laws against proceeds of crime. In reality this is an act of intimidation which is highly indicative of criminal motives within the AFP itself, and we go into some of the reasons why this might be the case.

We also take a look at the latest developments in the spying scandal between Australia and Indonesia and how this may be connected with the Corby case.

Related Links

Deconstructing mainstream news coverage on Syria with Mimi Al Laham

February 12, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
February 12, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

17 February 2014 | Permalink | comments: 1
By Hereward Fenton

Mimi Al LahamSince the beginning of the Syrian conflict, the corporate media has been relentlessly pushing the meme that Syria is a country oppressed by a totalitarian regime ruled by brutal dictator who has been slaughtering his own people who are simply calling for democracy.

The vast majority of people who get their news via mainstream sources have accepted this view of the situation, as it seems very plausible if one doesn't look too closely. Indeed such tyrannical regimes are all too common all over the world these days.

Those who watch the news with a more critical eye will have noticed how over time the opposition in Syria went from being described as "protesters" to "militants" to a "rebel army", with no analysis of who these people really are at any stage. When it became apparent that the rebel forces were composed of many Jihadist foreigners who described themselves as "Al Qaeda" forces, mainstream outlets such as the BBC continued to broadcast interviews and news reports exclusively from the rebel point of view as if this was all business as usual. There were no stern confrontations on shows like Hard Talk. There was no outrage, nor even an ironical observation about how the west was now allied with its arch enemy. It was a perfect implementation of George Orwell's concept of "doublethink". We were now expected to temporarily forget that Al Qaeda was our worst enemy, but only for as long as needed in order to facilitate the objectives of the current conflict. We were also to forget that we had ever made this switch in our thinking.

My guest in the 2nd hour of today's show, Mimi Al Laham, has been documenting and deconstructing this unfolding litany of doublethink and propaganda for several years now on her Youtube channel. In today's show we take a look at the big picture of Syria and the west over the past twelve months. We also take a look at the shocking scandal of  American propagandist and mercenary Matthew VanDyke who Mimi has exposed both as a fake journalist and as a paid military combatant in both the Libyan and Syrian conflicts.

In the first hour of today's show we take a look at some news relating to the Schapelle Corby case, and we bring you an excerpt from a confrontation between radio personality John Laws and a caller who wanted to advocate the position that Schapelle was wrongly convicted.

I hope you enjoy the show!

Related Links

“Schapelle is innocent” - Australian government

February 5, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
February 5, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

07 February 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Gerry Georgatos, Schapelle Corby ]

Kerobokan Prison
Floods are a common occurence inside Bali's Kerobokan Prison

Today in the second hour we welcome investigative journalist Gerry Georgatos, who will be discussing the Schapelle Corby case in depth and why he believes she is totally innocent of importing 4.2 Kg of marijuana into Bali in 2004.

Schapelle is due to be released on parole shortly and we have once again seen the media engage in baseless attacks on her character, the most outrageous of which was the suggestion on prime time TV, by a woman claiming to be her former lawyer, that Schapelle would be celebrating her release with a huge marijuana joint. In another bizarre smear a major media site published an article suggesting that Shapelle's supporters have exaggerated the pain and suffering caused by her incarceration. An article published on Yahoo 7 (now scrubbed), suggested that life inside Bali's Kerobokan prison was almost idyllic, with prisoners receiving art, reflexology, sewing, knitting and cooking classes. A reference to the deleted article can be found here. The reality, as documented by former inmate Rachel Dougall, is that life inside Kerobokan prison is very harsh indeed, with rampant drug abuse, the constant risk of violence and extremely poor living conditions.

Gerry Georgatos is an independent journalist who writes for The Stringer, and has previously appeared on the ABC 7:30 report exposing the mistreatment of minors held in detention over people smuggling charges.

In today's discussion Gerry makes the startling claim that officials in both the Australian and Indonesian governments have admitted to him privately that they know Schapelle is innocent.

By the time you read this article Schapelle will hopefully be free on parole, however the quest for truth, justice and restitution will have barely begun.

In our interview today Gerry explains that it is vital the Australian people are properly informed about the substantive issues in this case and the wealth of evidence held by the government that goes against the popular belief that Schapelle is guilty as charged.

As for the mainstream media and their decade long barrage of character defamation against the Corby family, this is a matter for all Australians to consider very deeply and to take action on. The media needs to be reformed and there needs to be justice meted out to those who have manufactured lies to protect corrupt government institutions.

The Schapelle Corby campaign will most certainly not end with her release from prison!

Related Links

Tony Abbott shows his true colours

January 29, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
January 29, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

03 February 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

In today's show we deconstruct, dissect and dismantle Australian PM Tony Abbott, exposing him for what he truly is: another front man for a crime syndicate which disguises itself in the form of "elected governments" in fake democracies all over the world.

We analyse Abbott's stance on critical issues of spying and surveillance and find that he cravenly backs the lawless practices of the NSA, casually referring to whistlebower Edward Snowden as a "traitor" and issuing veiled threats against any news agencies that don't tow the line of government policy in this area.

We also take a closer look at Abbott's policies on asylum seekers, and find that the government's new hardline approach which involves turning boats back is merely a smoke screen to distract you from the catastrophic deluge of government approved immigration which topped 300,000 last year. 

We further note that the influx of refugees into Australia is mainly from parts of the world which have been deliberately destabilised by our allies as part of their program of global hegemony. The Australian people are therefore to some degree responsible for this crisis and those who support the barbaric policy of turning boats back are the focus of scorn in today's show.

Also in today's show we take a look at some recent attempts by science publishers to stifle debate on climate change.

Related Links

Is human space travel feasible, or is Earth a prison?

January 15, 2014, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
January 15, 2014, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

24 January 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

Man on the Moon

Forty years after the spectacular achievements of the Apollo program humans remain marooned on planet Earth. We hear a great deal of talk about manned missions to the Moon and Mars, but in reality there is nothing going on. The talk about Mars One is little more the a PR stunt at this stage, and any sensible person must wonder how the promoters of this project expect to get there by the ridiculously improbable date of 2023 without any testing or proof of feasibility.

In today's show we are joined by Damon Crowe in the first hour to discuss some of the latest research from impeccable sources which indicates that manned space flight faces a very serious hurdle due to the problem of radiation. This hurdle may ultimately be surmountable but at present it seems clear that the radiation hazards are far too severe to allow humans to travel even to the Moon, let alone Mars.

Damon's research begs the question, did we ever send humans to the Moon in the first place? Based on the technical data available, the answer appears to be a resounding "no!". I know this will anger many listeners, and I wish to stress that TNRA has no vested interest in questioning the Apollo moon landing narrative. Personally I would far prefer to believe that the Apollo missions were real than hold the cynical view that these were staged events created for propaganda purposes. I further believe only time will tell about the truth of the Apollo missions. If further evidence comes to light proving that the Apollo missions were real, I will be delighted, and I will immediately update this website with the news.

In the 2nd hour of today's show we are joined by Jarrah White, creator of the Youtube Moonfaker series. Jarrah's one man mission to debunk the Apollo missions has earned him international notoriety and bevy of haters on the internet. Jarrah is currently studying towards a degree in Astro Physics and we wish him well in his endeavours. Today Jarrah gives us an insight into his own journey as a sceptic and the major figures who influenced him.

Today's show is not presented as a definitive statement about Apollo or space travel, and we acknowledge the extremely problematic and controversial nature of the subject matter. Our mission simply is to get to the truth, however long it takes, and we hope that this show helps in some measure toward that end!

Top 10 Crimes Against Truth 2013

December 31, 2013, part 1 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here
December 31, 2013, part 2 of 2.
Download mp3 » click here

03 January 2014 | Permalink | comments: 0
By Hereward Fenton

In today's show, the last for 2013, I bring you my list of the top ten crimes against truth for the year.

What is a "crime against truth"? The wording is borrowed from that of the Nuremburg War Crimes trials, which coined the term "crime against peace", and embodies a similar principle. Crimes against truth are significant not simply because of the immediate damage they cause but because they erode the very foundations of civilisation and thus have deep and long lasting effects which are very difficult to reverse.

My list is a subjective one, and you may not agree with all the entries. I have included 2 popular conspiracy theories in my list because I believe that these represent untruths which have done a great deal of damage to the credibility of those who call themselves "truthers", myself included. It's a popular position among truthers that we should keep an open mind regarding all conspiracy theories and refrain from criticising those alternative theories with which we disagree out of loyalty to the team. I believe this is a deeply misguided and dangerous attitude, which reflects a degree of ignorance about the true nature of the information war in which we are all engaged.

As George Orwell said, "in a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" - but there is a catch to this. If you want to counteract a culture of lies by telling the truth then you must at all costs and with great diligence guard against spreading lies yourself. It is not good enough to simply profess an "open mind" and allow all manner of hoaxes and rumours to be propagated in your name. That will not effect a revolution. That will actually strengthen the status quo because it erodes the very basis of your "truth movement".

I have included in the list a couple items which are mainly significant for Australians. However, these issues are ones I feel very passionately about, so I stand by them while acknowledging my subjective bias.

Here then is the TNRA list of the top ten crimes against truth for 2013, which are discussed in detail in the associated podcast. Each crime is presented here in the form of a statement which is itself a lie.

  1. The US economy Is recovering
  2. The Syrian regime is a brutal dictatorship which the international community must bring to an end
  3. Iran is attempting to build a nuclear weapon and has failed to meet its obligations to the Atomic Energy Agency
  4. The people of Gaza are doing OK.
  5. The debate about Global Warming is over - we must maintain a carbon tax in order to save the planet.
  6. The refugee crisis in Australia is unique and unprecedented and people smugglers are abhorrent criminals.
  7. Schapelle Corby is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of importing cannabis into Bali.
  8. The protest movement in Thailand is anti-democratic and orchestrated by a minority of monied elites.
  9. Normal aircraft  contrails dissipate quickly. Those which persist are toxic, and are the product of a global geo-engineering operation known as "chemtrails".
  10. No children died at Sandy Hook. The victims' family members and witnesses seen on TV were all crisis actors.

It's been a great great honour bringing you this show for over 5 years now - and I'm just getting going. Stay tuned!

Related Links

Page 6 of 109 pages ‹ First  < 4 5 6 7 8 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments

fenton lies about the obvious, and thinks he is being clever??
nothing wrong with sandy hook, nothing wrong with the pentagon, and nothing wrong with chemtrails.

you need to retitle your pathetic blog you pathetic liar.

By jklm on 2015 01 26 - 10:22:57
From the entry 'Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!'.

Link to freeze point table is broken by comment formatting. Paste the whole next line to browser:

dimitrxe.pp.fi/pub/pol/chem/pages/Persistent Contrail.html

By Josh on 2015 01 23 - 06:11:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett wrote:

“You have never refuted any claims you have simply disagreed with them.”

Are you saying you have not checked the references I provided?


“Saturation of a parcel of air is 100% moisture when the temperature is at dew point”

Again you are ignoring saturation with respect to ice which is not the same as saturation with respect to water. You want to look at the frost point, not the dew point.

Supersaturation with respect to ice can be reached at RH levels of 70 percent and less. Have a look at this table - are you saying it’s wrong?


“The burning of carbon based fuels does not create water, the water is there all the time”

You are leaving the ground of school-grade chemistry. I have already provided you twice with the chemical equation for kerosene combustion in a jet engine.

For the third time:

2 * C12H26 + 37 * O2—-> 24 * CO2 + 26 * H2O

By the way, here is the benzene combustion in your car - every time the engine runs it creates water:

2 * C6H6 + 15 * O2—-> 12 * CO2 + 6 * H2O

In case you did not notice, the H2O molecules are water. Which is newly created by the combustion.
Again, not my invention, it’s basic chemistry. If you’re saying these equations are wrong, then where are your’s?


“If you cannot tell the difference in altitude between an aircraft flying at 30,000 feet and one at 15,000 feet you should really see an optometrist”

That’s not what you have claimed. You described a contrail at around 10 degrees above the horizon and said you determined the altitude to be 10000 feet - with your bare eyes. You did not mention any plane.

Here is what you wrote:

“[...] I took 4 [photographs] today at midday showing two distinct chemtrails at about 10,000 feet near our home at Enoggera near Brisbane, which were about 2,000 feet above some scattered fair weather cumulus cloud”

I had provided a reference to a scientific study that determined the maximum distance for stereo viewing at 160 meters. I won’t quote it again, it’s all on the previous page.

Bottom line is that you have not shown how you could determine the altitude of these contrails as 10000 ft with your bare eyes. Do you know of any other pilot who would believe you?

By Josh on 2015 01 23 - 05:32:31
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

God I’m sick of these dismissive hit pieces with nothing more to offer than an attempt at a boot in the ‘gonads’ at a wholly ambiguous collective. “Sandy Hook trutherism is unforgivable” is it ? Whatever else Sandy Hook was it was a media extravaganza with an agenda and people are entitled to respond to it as such without being turned into parahias.
——————————-
Kathy C | Seller Support Team Manager at Westpac

By Kathy C on 2015 01 23 - 04:50:26
From the entry 'Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!'.

She is shallow, unintelligent, scheming, passive aggressive. I wouldnt be suprised if Wills wanted to get shot of her, but in a round about way was just forced into marriage with her because he had never been given the opportunity to play the scene. Here was safe. Hand picked for safe. Boring, smug, shallow kate.
——————————-
Sophie Hackett | Manager at <a >Bank of Melbourne</a>

By Sophie Hackett on 2015 01 23 - 04:44:58
From the entry 'Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!'.

These are great tips! Thanks so much for putting the spotlight on "no plane" and "video fakery" theories!
---------------------
Matilda Barratt | Seller Support Team Manager at St George Bank

By Nancy Barratt on 2015 01 23 - 04:35:03
From the entry 'For those who are on the fence about "No Planes" & "Video Fakery" Theories'.

Leonard Clampett wrote about me:
As an amateur he claims to be more informed than I, as a professional
As I have said several times before - credentials are irrelevant if you don’t get your facts straight. You still have not issued any comments regarding your earlier claims after I have refuted them.
Did you change your stance on supersaturation with respect to ice?
Does it exist and is it a commonly occurring phenomenon as atmospheric science says?
Does one tonne of jet fuel generate roughly 1.3 tonnes of water when combusted?
Isn’t it basic chemistry that burning of any hydrocarbon fuel creates water?
Have you accepted that you can’t determine the altitude of a contrail just by using your stereoscopic view?
By Josh on 2014 12 30 - 08:22:05

Credentials from scientists therefore cannot be relevant if you don’t believe their facts are correct. Is that correct Joshnonymous? Who is the arbiter?
You have never refuted any claims you have simply disagreed with them. You are not right simply because you think you are.
Saturation of a parcel of air is when cloud forms. You can see this occurring in the sky above you on most days. Saturation of a parcel of air is 100% moisture when the temperature is at dew point. Supersaturation in clear air can occur when the water in exhaust emissions from an aircraft at altitude, in the right ambient conditions, condense after being turned to gas in the high temperatures in the can (combustion chamber). When this condensate is left to its own devices it takes up the temperature of the surrounding air and evaporates as the water content fuses into the surrounding drier air. This can take a few minutes but certainly not linger and become cloud as you claim. Otherwise we need just fly a few aircraft around to make cloud and dispense with droughts. That has been tried and does not work for obvious scientific reasons. If the surrounding air was saturated their would be cloud already. The difference between contrails that disappear within a kilometre or two behind an aircraft and those that remain for many minutes is caused by the variance in the humidity. You never see the contrails emitted in cloud do you? Meteorology 101. You get to understand all this in the senior examination studies but not in the hobby pilot exams.
The burning of carbon based fuels does not create water, the water is there all the time, and the aircraft does not carry 1.3 times its fuel load into the upper atmosphere. Weight and balance tables will tell you that. Load data sheets tell you that. The operations crew who load and fuel the aircraft will tell you that. The pilots know that because they do not take off overweight, otherwise their TOLD cards would be wrong every time. The extra water comes from the air masses that are compressed by the engines as they fly through the air masses.
If you cannot tell the difference in altitude between an aircraft flying at 30,000 feet and one at 15,000 feet you should really see an optometrist, or better still an ophthalmologist, the ones I see every year to have my eyes thoroughly checked in accordance with the legislation so provided.
Have a good day.

By Leonard Clampett on 2015 01 22 - 20:55:52
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

まずは|素晴らしいと言う私がしたいと私がしたいブログ!私は簡単な質問を持っていた心|私はあなたがいないをすればそうでない場合は、聞きしたいのですが、その。 自分の考えあなた自身とクリアを中央にどのように  見つけるために知っている前書き込み私がいた。 私がしたいた困難な時期|アイデアを得ることに私のクリア思考の心を出。 失われた無駄な 私は本当にない|書き込みしかし、それはでの喜びを取る楽しむちょうど最初の10〜15分のように思える単純に開始する方法を把握しよう。どれアイデアまたはヒント? おかげ!

By ugg ブーツ 店舗 大阪 on 2015 01 22 - 20:30:46
From the entry 'War monger Tony Abbott recklessy accuses the Russian President over downed passenger plane'.

Amazed: Hereward isn’t saying anything here about 100% free speech, only pointing out that the people who rule have double standards: upholding the right of one group to freedom of speech, but not to another. Thus your argument is irrelevant to the subject. Unless you’re suggesting that because 100% free speech is undesirable (according to you), it’s ok for this situation to occur?

By zek on 2015 01 22 - 01:00:55
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

If Hereward believed in 100% speech, then he would have left everyone alone on his 9/11 forum.
There is a line to speech. What most are saying, without saying it now days is, they want their right to offend other people. Does Hereward call Jews “kikes” or Negro’s “nigger”? Or allow other people on his site to use those words? No of course not. There is no such thing as 100% “free” speech. If it were “free”, then we could say any and everything to any and everyone.

By Amazed on 2015 01 20 - 18:15:06
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

Categories