Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

Latest LIVE show

Hereward Fenton

March 28, 2015
In today's show we look at Australias new metadata retention laws which cleared the Senate last week. Get the podcast »

Listen Live or Call In !

Recent News & Podcasts

Amy Goodman discusses her arrest

14 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Amy Goodman discusses her arrest, the arrests of her colleagues, police response to demonstrators, and freedom of the press at the Republican National Convention.

Aired on September 5, 2008 on NOW on PBS.

Breaking The Silence - Truth and Lies in the War on Terror

14 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

An astounding documentary from John Pilger (2003).  The film ends with the chilling words "If we remain silent, victory over us is assured".

Award-winning journalist John Pilger investigates the discrepancies between American and British claims for the 'war on terror' and the facts on the ground as he finds them in Afghanistan and Washington, DC. In 2001, as the bombs began to drop, George W. Bush promised Afghanistan "the generosity of America and its allies".

Now, the familiar old warlords are regaining power, religious fundamentalism is renewing its grip and military skirmishes continue routinely. In "liberated" Afghanistan, America has its military base and pipeline access, while the people have the warlords who are, says one woman, "in many ways worse than the Taliban". In Washington, Pilger conducts a series of remarkable interviews with William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, and leading Administration officials such as Douglas Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and John Bolton, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.

These people, and the other architects of the Project for the New American Century, were dismissed as 'the crazies' by the first Bush Administration in the early 90s when they first presented their ideas for pre-emptive strikes and world domination.

Pilger also interviews presidential candidate General Wesley Clark, and former intelligence officers, all the while raising searching questions about the real motives for the 'war on terror'.

While President Bush refers to the US attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq as two 'great victories', Pilger asks the question - victories over whom, and for what purpose? Pilger describes Afghanistan as a country "more devastated than anything I have seen since Pol Pot's Cambodia". He finds that Al-Qaida has not been defeated and that the Taliban is re-emerging. And of the "victory" in Iraq, he asks: "Is this Bush's Vietnam?"

TNRA 12 September 2008

September 12, 2008, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

14 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 2
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement, Australia ]

On Friday, 12 September, we recorded our show with a live studio audience at the Tom Mann Theatre in Sydney.

The show featured a panel discussion followed by a question and answer session.  On the panel we had the pleasure of the company the following esteemed guests:

  • Gillian Norman (Film Maker)

  • John Bursill (Boeing Engineer)

  • Frank Legge (Chemist)

  • James O'Neill Barrister at Law)

  • Dr. David Leifer (Architect and member of

The panel engaged in a lively critique of the new Italian 9/11 film Zero, and we covered a variety of other topics, some of which proved to be controversial within the group.

A big thankyou from Josh and myself to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Jose who managed to find an essential piece of equipment at the last moment!

Please pass this podcast link on to your friends and feel free to download and burn to disk if you wish.

I hope to have the video version online soon.

400 European truth activists march in Brussels

12 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

United for Truth - European 911 Truth Movement


Last Sunday over 400 European truth activists ignored the rain and had a non-violent march in Brussels. They gathered at 2 P.M. in front of the Berlaymont building at Schuman, Brussels. At 3 P.M. they took a walk of 4 kilometers with a stop at the US Embassy. Before the rally left, the organizers delivered a letter to the assistant to Giulietto Chiesa, Euro-MP for Italy. Under police guidance they tried to deliver a letter containing their request to start an independent and international investigation to what happened in the U.S.A. just 7 years ago. They were told that the embassy was closed and didn't accept their letter unless is was delivered by mail. There were no incidents during the protests, and the organizers were once again very positive about the collaboration with the Brussels Police.

Furthermore, the platform is endorsed by various Non Governmental Organizations like The Committee for the Abolition of Third World Debt (CATMD), CODIP, ReOpen911 and ATTAC Brussels. The first Belgian political party CAP (Comité Autre Politique) joined the rally at the end.

The platform these people and organizations support is: "In solidarity with the American citizens, we demand an independent investigation of the 9/11 attacks, which were the pretext for too many wars, lies, and a serious decrease of (y)our civil rights ("anti-terrorist"-acts, secret prisons, "Patriot act", etc). We want European troops back home! We want European laws that guarantee neutrality of the internet and that explicitly forbid tracing/chipping (RFID) of human beings as well as other electronic threats on our freedom. We want democratic and public control of financial organizations (IMF, WB, etc) and the mass media. But most of all we want to get our life back."

United for Truth made its first public appearance in September 2007. They organized the first European protest in Brussels calling to support a majority of the American people, who want a re-investigation of the 9/11 attacks. This protest is coordinated by two Belgian artists; a 25 year old Dutch speaking producer who associated with a 41 year old French speaking percussionist.

English & Dutch: Julez Edward, +32 479 936 236
French & Spanish: Olivier Galand, +32 477 257 255

Protest Outside ABC Studio - 11 September 2008

10 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

The Sydney Truth Action group will be staging a protest outside ABC studios in Ultimo on Thursday, 11 September from 11:00 AM - 01:00 PM (see map).

ABC Studios Ultimo

This is a great opportunity to make a difference, and let our (taxpayer funded) national broadcaster know we require that they exercise due diligence in covering matters of grave public concern such as 9/11.

According to a recent report, Australia currently has 1080 troops deployed in Afghanistan, yet neither the Taliban leaders nor Osama bin Laden have ever been indicted for the terrorist attacks on 9/11!

We have been misled into a conflict which has no basis in international law.

9/11 was never properly investigated.

Can we continue to allow our fellow Australians to kill and to die for a lie? 

Voice your concern and join us in protest on 11 September.

Four Corners forum discusses “The Third Tower”

10 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Last Night ABC TV (Australia) aired the BBC documentary The Third Tower, which purports to be an objective investigation into "conspiracy theories swirling over 9/11".

This morning there a number of discussion topics on the Four Corners website dedicated to the topic, and from a quick look it is clear once again, as was demonstrated when ABC Unleashed published a short  opinion piece on 9/11 unanswered questions, that the public is simply not satisfied with the level of journalistic integrity evidenced by the major media.


Last night's programme on World Trade Centre 7 was neither, “Investigative" nor "Journalism". It was just a rerun of a BBC programme that left major questions unanswered. I expected more from my ABC. If this is your measure of the qualities to which you apparently hold yourselves to, then everything that you show from this point on has no credibility.

There is so much more that needs to be explained here.

- Mark

Read more here.


All systems go for the Trilogy of Truth starting this Thursday

09 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Tonight we visited the Tom Mann Theatre in Surry Hills, to prepare and plan for the trilogy of truth starting this Thursday, 11 September - at 7pm.

The detailed program can be found on this page.

Be there or be square!


Tom Mann Theatre

Amy Goodman is arrested and cuffed

05 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Democracy Now presenter Amy Goodman has been arrested and charged with obstructing legal process, and two other DN staff are under arrest pending felony P.C. (probable cause) riot charges.

Goodman was arrested while questioning police about the unlawful detention of Democracy Now producers Sharif Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar who were arrested while they carried out their journalistic duties in covering street demonstrations at the Republican National Convention.

In the video you can see Amy being cuffed and led away by riot police.

Please visit Democracy Now for more information on this breaking story.

Democracy Now are asking all concerned members of the public to contact the Ramsey County Attorney's Office and to demand that they not press charges against Kouddous and Salazar.

Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner
RCA at (cc: dropthecharges at

Susan Gaertner for Governor
info at (cc: dropthecharges at
(612) 978-8625

Note: Be sure to cc: on all emails so that DN can deliver print outs of your messages to the St. Paul City Attorney and Ramsey County Attorney offices.

Page 88 of 109 pages ‹ First  < 86 87 88 89 90 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments

TAFKAA sorry I don’t follow much of your above posting. Too many initials, too many esoteric references. If you really want to say something to me you’ll have to make it simpler. If you are not talking to me specifically, however, don’t worry about it.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 15 - 05:51:28
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

@ Hereward if you not too busy during the great debate ranting about contrails and evil chemtrailers maybe you could get around to considering conflated issues like climate change and giving us your opinion regarding should we even be considering climate management and the suitability of weather modification programs such as the Satellite Weather Modification System (SWMS) using earth satellites to harness solar energy to modify the thermodynamics and composition of the earth’s atmosphere.

@Wayne Hall unlike the need to broaden this current dialogue and the underlying climate change discussion, it is a discussion for another place why some operating from the darkwebz choose anonymity and avoiding being linked to a government supplied corporate sponsored commercial & legally binding identity. Considering what some extreme radicals call the increasing police state ushered in under cover of ideals like cyber activism is violence etc it’s rumoured some brownshirt thugs do it for nothing other than because they can & the LULZ they get from teaching others the techniques and value of anonymity.  If other’s are inspired to learn and practice surf sec after seeing this blog than that alone is reason enough in itself, even if poor “OP” says we are not welcome.

By TAFKAA on 2012 11 15 - 00:57:58
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

related ...

“..... Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. “

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen

im sorry to say hereward, that i wont be available for any interviews either, ill be busy those days.

perhaps we could schedule something though to debate the evidence of flight 77 hitting the pentagon or not… let me know if you ever find any, and ill check my schedule then.

best regards!

agin mee

By agin mee on 2012 11 14 - 23:05:57
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Here in Greece, among the people I have been talking to, the subject has been “how can one know” that Cyclone Sandy was a deliberate attack on New York and the Eastern seabord of the U.S., rather than an example of “geoengineering gone wrong”.

The question was asked to me by the secretary of the conservative parliamentarian Kostas Kollias, who has been the most dismissive of official “explanations” of what people are seeing in the skies.

It just so happens that this secretary is a close relative of two key people in the Open Meeting of Citizens of Aegina (former “indignados”), who have been resisting involvement with the chemtrails subject, because of the influence in Greece of the leftist SYRIZA party on the “Indignados”.

Being outflanked “on the Left” by a conservative parliamentarian is not a pleasant experience for fiercely radical “civil society” activists.

The American chemtrails activist Dane Wigington gave this answer to the question I asked above:

“First, the modeling from almost all sources predicting the 90 degree east turn 5 days out. All the models are one way or another the product of the geoengineering players. This was a completely unnatural course.

Second, the HAARP signal detection over NY prior to the strike as the storm was nearing the point of turning was the strongest ever recorded. This signal focused over NY bulges the atmosphere over that area creating a “vacuum” underneath to help pull the storm in.

Next, there was massive spraying of the storm. It should have been stronger, not weaker. With a 940 millibar pressure center and a 1000 mile circulation, it should have been a cat 3 or 4 storm. They delivered a “measured blow” exactly where they wanted it. We can all speculate as to all the reasons why. There is more data on our site.”

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 14 - 20:35:59
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

I can understand Hereward’s problem because has been given an unviable brief. He has been told that his task has been to prove that “chemtrails are contrails” and he has conscientiously set about trying to do what he has been asked to do.

Anyone who agrees to accept funding for a particular purpose has to consider the viability of what is being required.

I was involved in the attempt to set up a branch of Friends of the Earth in Greece. It was in the mid nineties, at about the time that the ground was being prepared to try to secure political support for the EU’s projected task of extending the emissions trading scheme to aviation.

We won the mandate, but then one of the first things Friends of the Earth asked us to do was to campaign for acceptance of an increase in the price of air tickets. Along with one or two colleagues, I perceived the non-viability of the campaign: to ask people to agree to pay more to travel by air was not a route to anywhere. We therefore disembarked from the project of trying to become Friends of the Earth, Greece.

Hereward is persistent. He is still trying to persuade himself, and the world, that chemtrails activists’ (and informed specialists’) lack of interest in engaging in debate on the terms of Hereward’s brief shows something negative about them, rather than about his own brief.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 14 - 20:19:46
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

“Contrails spread because of air turbulence created by the passage of aircraft, differences in wind speed along the flight track, and possibly through effects of solar heating.”

This quote from above under the video an only have come from somebody with not much of an idea. Turbulence of any severity is what causes contrails to break up and dissipate.

By Leonard Clampett on 2012 11 14 - 19:23:35
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

No chance of supersaturation as far as cyclones are concerned, but plenty of cloud.

No beer bottles at high altitude and the critic of my post on that must have misunderstood when I wrote that that was the opposite of what happens at altitude.

The only moisture that comes from combustion is from the hydrogen molecules and they are not overly saturated as there is no water in fuel in aircraft. Ergo, the only moisture emitted from an exhaust came from the intake air and minuscule amounts of hydrogen.

I distribute a Nanotech Fuel Saver which gives all internal combustion engines almost 100% combustion efficiency. Reciprocating, rotary, turbine or otherwise. Our car, a Toyota Aurion, has 119,000 kilometres on the odometer and passes exhaust gas emission tests with 100 percent efficiency and a lambda of 1. It emits some water and warm air only on starting, and when reaching operating temperature it only emits warm air. You can place your hand on the exhaust pipe after a 200 kilometre run and have no fear of getting burned. It has no residue and no discolouring in the exhaust pipe. Having tested vehicles for economy for many years I believe I know what exhaust emissions are made of and understand that only gasses and particulates are emitted.

Those who believe that the photo at the top of this page has been faked because there were no jets over London during the second world war, just do not understand that the engine used does not determine a contrail, it can be a piston engine or a turbine. It is ambient conditions that predicate contrails obeying the laws of physics and thermodynamics.

By Leonard Clampett on 2012 11 14 - 19:15:30
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

——-Original Message——-
From: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) [mailto: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) ]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 5:18 PM
To: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Subject: Debate with Mike Glynn?

Hi there,

This is Hereward from Truth News Radio Australia.
Mike Glynn has agreed to come on my show to debate the chemtrails/contrails controversy.
Mike is an airline pilot and a sceptic of chemtrail claims as you probably know.

Would you like to come on the show to argue your case with him?
We go to air every Wednesday 8PM CST in the US. In Sydney this corresponds
to 1PM Thursdays.

Please let me know if you are interested and we’ll organise it!

best regards,

Hereward Fenton


I do not argue a case. Others are free to believe whatever they will.
I am not here to alter their minds, rather I present what I know/believe based on my experience and evidence I believe to be best available.

I never debate sceptics because the very definition of a sceptic is one who does not have sufficient information to form an opinion one way or the other.

Thanks anyway,

Leonard William
Authorised Representative/Secured Party for
the government created Corporate Artifice/Artificial Legal Entity
A first Australian original/origine (not ab-original nor sub-original, but original, nor are we ab-normal nor sub-normal but purely normal)
Collins Dictionary of English
away from; off; outside of; opposite to ⇒ abnormal abaxial aboral
Word Origin
from Latin ab away from
Aircraft Maintenance Engineer
Airline Transport Pilot (Ret.)
Constitution law researcher & analyst
Engineer RAE (Ret.)
PNG, Borneo & Vietnam Veteran
Middle of the road activist/Common Sense extremist

50 Harding Street
Enoggera Qld 4051

Would you like an interest-free, fee-free loan for house, business or personal use?
With no strings attached.
Go to and buy the book that tells you how.
“Out of the Red and Into the Black”.
AU$10 within Australia, AU$15 elsewhere.


Your refusal to engage in a debate speaks volumes about your credibility.

So far every chemtrail activist I’ve spoken with has refused to debate the subject. I find that weird.

I guess Mike Glynn will steal the show!

Let me know if you change your mind.



Best of luck to Mike for stealing the show, whatever that may mean.

I do not believe my credibility is at stake in anyway, rather that it is the veracity of evidence offered that is under scrutiny. As an instance those who promote claims that chemtrails do not exist and seem a little concerned over a couple of my posts, the matter of supersaturation comes to mind. The Wikipedia website promoted in regard to this supersaturation claim is about the supersaturation of liquids under pressure. “Fizzy” drinks have CO2 forced into their containers under pressure. This is the only way to get the gas into suspension and it is released only when the pressure is released upon opening, for instance. Divers suffer the “bends” when surfacing too fast as gasses dissolved in their body by pressure at depth are released from dissolution.

CO2 is absorbed by the sea waters in particulate form. No pressure there except gravity.

Atmospheric pressure is described as the measurement at the base of a column of air extending up to the limit of the atmosphere enclosing the planet. At Mean Sea Level standard pressure of 14.7 pounds to the square inch or 29.92 inches of mercury or 1013.2 hectopascals (hPa) (millibars), the weight of the column of air above the measurement point is that which is measured. A millibar change in altitude equates to 30 feet (approximately) so at, say, 20,000 feet the standard temperature would be about -25 degrees Celsius and the Standard pressure would be about 346 millibars. The humidity is the main variant in this equation to create Dew Point and visible moisture (cloud/fog).

We know that cyclones become very dangerous when their pressure centre falls to about 990 hectopascals. Ergo, no pressure here to possibly cause saturation beyond 100%, therefore no pressure at altitude either to create supersaturation. If the centre of pressure in a cyclone fell to about 950 millibars the wind would be so strong that everything in the vicinity would be blown away except the very earth itself.

At 40,000 the standard pressure is about -320 millibars and standard temperature about -65 Celsius. Density at any altitude depends upon temperature and humidity.

As we can see there can be no supersaturation at altitude due to the lack of required pressure. The laws of physics are obeyed by nature and 100% humidity finds that when the temperature combines and Dew Point is reached we get cloud/fog and any reduction in temperature or addition of moisture will produce rain or ice which will suffer under gravity.


By Leonard Clampett on 2012 11 14 - 18:52:41
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

One point to “think about”. If “contrail cirrus” is useful to the world because it lowers the level of incoming sunlight and cools the planet, how is it to be distinguished from “normal” cirrus? What is abnormal about aircraft, and many many of them, flying in “our” skies?

Is there some “normal” cirrus that is hermetically sealed from being affected by aircraft?

Is that close enough to the “topic of the blog article”? 

Surely the point that is at issue in the “chemtrails/contrails” argument is whether what is being seen in the sky is the unintended and useless, indeed undesirable (European Union aviation policy)  side effect of flying jet aircraft or whether someone has a motivation to produce it because it serves some purpose they have in mind.

A comment on that, Josh, or is that unrelated to the “topic of the blog” also?

Why did the BBC clip refer to “normal cirrus”? What is it?

Is it anything more than a confused and stupidly cunning reaction to the contrails/chemtrails argument??

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 14 - 15:42:05
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

“Before making some kind of angry reply, I urge you to read this article and associated links. It’s fairly detailed, and deals with most of the usual claims made by chemtrail alarmists.”

thats like me saying… maybe on the subject of 911..

Before making some kind of angry reply, I urge you to read this article ( popular mechanic ) and associated links. It’s fairly detailed, and deals with most of the usual claims made by conspiracy theorists.

dont tell me thats not insulting…

“Those who promote this idea are simply repeating something they read on a web page without checking sources.”

translation - if you dont agree with me… you cant think for yourself..

the whole article is one big unqualified insult.

thats my opinion.

By agin mee on 2012 11 14 - 13:14:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.