Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

Latest LIVE show

Hereward Fenton

January 23, 2016
Climb aboard the ship of truth with Hereward Fenton at the helm, as we plough through uncharted waters of geo-politics, scandals, cover-ups, war and tyranny.

Listen Live or Call In !

Recent News & Podcasts

Four Corners forum discusses “The Third Tower”

10 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Last Night ABC TV (Australia) aired the BBC documentary The Third Tower, which purports to be an objective investigation into "conspiracy theories swirling over 9/11".

This morning there a number of discussion topics on the Four Corners website dedicated to the topic, and from a quick look it is clear once again, as was demonstrated when ABC Unleashed published a short  opinion piece on 9/11 unanswered questions, that the public is simply not satisfied with the level of journalistic integrity evidenced by the major media.


Last night's programme on World Trade Centre 7 was neither, “Investigative" nor "Journalism". It was just a rerun of a BBC programme that left major questions unanswered. I expected more from my ABC. If this is your measure of the qualities to which you apparently hold yourselves to, then everything that you show from this point on has no credibility.

There is so much more that needs to be explained here.

- Mark

Read more here.


All systems go for the Trilogy of Truth starting this Thursday

09 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Tonight we visited the Tom Mann Theatre in Surry Hills, to prepare and plan for the trilogy of truth starting this Thursday, 11 September - at 7pm.

The detailed program can be found on this page.

Be there or be square!


Tom Mann Theatre

Amy Goodman is arrested and cuffed

05 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Democracy Now presenter Amy Goodman has been arrested and charged with obstructing legal process, and two other DN staff are under arrest pending felony P.C. (probable cause) riot charges.

Goodman was arrested while questioning police about the unlawful detention of Democracy Now producers Sharif Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar who were arrested while they carried out their journalistic duties in covering street demonstrations at the Republican National Convention.

In the video you can see Amy being cuffed and led away by riot police.

Please visit Democracy Now for more information on this breaking story.

Democracy Now are asking all concerned members of the public to contact the Ramsey County Attorney's Office and to demand that they not press charges against Kouddous and Salazar.

Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner
RCA at (cc: dropthecharges at

Susan Gaertner for Governor
info at (cc: dropthecharges at
(612) 978-8625

Note: Be sure to cc: on all emails so that DN can deliver print outs of your messages to the St. Paul City Attorney and Ramsey County Attorney offices.

Jesse Ventura - Man of Truth

04 September 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Jesse Ventura

We present two recent video clips featuring former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura. He is one of the most important voices for 9/11 Truth today. It is especially encouraging to see a man with such  impeccable credentials clearly advocating the most important arguments in favour of a new investigation of 9/11.

This man cannot be ignored or ridiculed. This is the core of the movement. This will bring change.

Jesse Ventura (born July 15, 1951 as James George Janos), also known as "The Body", "The Star", and "The Governing Body", is an American politician, retired professional wrestler, Navy UDT veteran, actor, and former radio and television talk show host. He was inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2004. He is also a former co-holder of the AWA World tag team title with Adrian Adonis.

In the Minnesota gubernatorial election of 1998, running as an Independent and member of the Reform Party, he was elected the 38th Governor of Minnesota and served from January 4, 1999 to January 6, 2003 without seeking a second term.



America is on the Brink of Fascism! Jesse Ventura


 Jesse Ventura Speaks About 9/11 at Ron Paul Rally (9/2/08)

TNRA 29 August 2008

August 29, 2008, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

31 August 2008 | Permalink | comments: 4

Categories: [ ]

Tonight we bring you a TNRA exclusive on vaccination and the big brother state.

Last week it was reported in the major media that a Sydney family was on the run from The Department of Community Services and the Police after the Supreme Court issued an order for the the forcible Hep B vaccination of their new-born child.

On the show we have Meryl Dorey, spokesperson for the Australian Vaccination Network. Meryl is currently trying to help the fugitive couple to find legal represention.

Meryl Dorey is a mother of 4 children aged between 12 and 19 years. Her eldest child had several severe reactions to his vaccinations – events which started her on the path to investigating this issue more thoroughly. Through more than 18 years of exhaustive research in medical journals and medical texts, Meryl has come to the conclusion that for a certain proportion of the population, the benefits of vaccination do not outweigh the risks.

In 1994, Meryl combined her energies with a group of parents and health professionals to form the Australian Vaccination Network. The AVN has continued ever since and is dedicated to:

  • ensuring that information on the risks and ineffectiveness of vaccines if made available to anyone seeing it;

  • making sure that vaccination is never made compulsory;

  • pushing for independent peer-reviewed research of vaccination including double-blind studies which have never yet been done.

More Links for tonight's show

Australian Vaccination Network

Compulsory Vaccination - It's here!

Parents on the run with baby after refusing vaccination

Sydney Morning Herald
Kate Benson Medical Reporter
August 23, 2008

A SYDNEY couple was on the run with their two-day-old baby last night after the Department of Community Services took out a Supreme Court order to have the boy vaccinated against hepatitis B.

Sydney parents under vaccination court order were threatened with arrest by hospital staff

The Australian
August 23 2008

A SYDNEY couple are in hiding after the Department of Community Services (DoCS) took out a court order to have their three-day-old boy vaccinated against hepatitis B.

Please contact Meryl Dorey at for more information about vaccination and your rights.

Thanks for listening!

Hereward & Josh

‘9/11 Truth’ activists march through Denver

29 August 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

08/27/2008 @ 10:39 am
Filed by Nick Juliano

911 Truth Protest, Denver August 2008DENVER -- Around 100 activists convinced that the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 were perpetrated by dark and mysterious actors within the US government marched across the city Tuesday in a sanctioned protest that resulted in no confrontations with police.

Members of the so-called "9/11 Truth" movement gathered outside Denver's city hall proceeding to snake through cordoned off streets towards the Pepsi Center, where the Democratic National Convention is being held this week. Radio host Alex Jones, who runs the conspiracy theory Web site and is a leader of the movement led demonstrators in chants of "9/11 was and inside job" and "Down with the New World Order."

Denver police on bicycles preceded the marchers through an empty street just outside of downtown. Few Democratic delegates saw the protesters as they marched -- a goal the parade route seemed designed to achieve.

Along with the activists, the march included a mock parade float. Labeled "God's Gitmo," it displayed protesters wearing masks depicting George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, John McCain and Barack Obama locked up behind a chain-link fence.

The march never got very close to the Pepsi Center itelf, which was surrounded by a security perimeter more than two blocks from the main entrance, but it did snake past a back entrance to the security perimeter around 2 p.m., when a scattering of delegates, reporters and other guests were arriving to the convention.

Stopping outside the gates, Jones and the marchers outlined their view that the 9/11 attacks were a "false flag" operation carried out by the US government for the sake of starting wars in the Middle East. At least a dozen police in riot gear stood guard near the outer entrance to the convention site, but the protesters had no intention of causing trouble. They moved on after about 15 minutes.

"That was the most organized anarchy I've ever seen," remarked one woman standing inside the security fences.

Moving on from the convention site entrance, the protesters decided to break up their march rather than continue into the designated free speech zone tucked off a corner of the convention site. The area's been dubbed the "freedom cage" by activists in town to protest the conventions.

The demonstrators reconvened near Denver's union station later Tuesday afternoon and set up behind the MSNBC set that had been erected nearby. They waved signs and chanted while Hardball was broadcast.

The show's host seemed at best bemused by the display. At one point during a commercial break, Matthews stepped to the edge of the set and seemed to taunt the demonstrators, making a "you're crazy" gesture circling his finger around his ear.

9/11 Truth Movement: Let’s Focus on Building 7

25 August 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

George Washington's Blog
Saturday, August 23, 2008

The government has handed us a golden opportunity.

By admitting that building 7 was not severely structurally damaged by debris falling from the Twin Towers, by admitting that diesel stored in the building was not what caused the building to collapse, and by ridiculously claiming that thermal expansion caused the first collapse of a modern steel-framed high-rise in history because of some "new phenomenon" that hasn't been taken into account before, NIST has set itself up for easy rebuttal.

And unlike the Twin Towers, which involved fancy top-down special effects, the destruction of WTC 7 looked like a classic demolition. Anyone who is shown a clip of 7 and a controlled demolition will see the perfect similarity.

Even polls at AOL and other mainstream sites show that the public isn't buying NIST's explanation.

So even if you believe that directed energy weapons, nuclear bombs or little green men brought down the Twin Towers, can you please put that aside for a little while?

If we don't focus on building 7, its stunning parallel to known controlled demolitions, and the obvious misrepresentations by NIST about why 7 collapsed, we are hurting and distracting the momentum towards truth and justice.

This is not to say that thermite, rdx or other methods weren't also used in building 7, in addition to more old-fashion methods. But the destruction of wtc 7 looks so "normal" by controlled demolition standards that any mention of directed energy weapons is not only not necessary, but it is hugely counter-productive.

Also, I don't believe directed energy weapons or nukes were used on 9/11. But my suggestion in this essay is separate and apart from my belief, and focuses on what will be most effective to spread truth to the public.

And I am not saying that we should ignore foreknowledge and warnings, protection of patsies, wire transfers, put options, stand downs and Norad's shifting stories, Cheney saying "the order still stands", Zelikow's myth-making role on the 9/11 Commission, or any of the numerous other facts showing that 9/11 was intentionally allowed, aided and abetted by elements within the U.S. government and defense industry.

What I am saying is that we should focus on the best evidence . . . and WTC 7 and NIST's weak excuse are some of the best evidence. And WTC 7 is getting alot of attention right now, right on the heels of the FBI's lame explanation for the anthrax attacks, the fake Iraq-9/11 memo, Cheney wanting to create a false incident to start a war with Iran, Bush wanting to paint a plane then shoot it down to justify the Iraq war, and other instances of deception by the government. NIST's shallow explanation of building 7 is part of this torrent of obvious government lies leaking out at this time. Let's use it (in a couple of months, some other aspect of 9/11 will probably take focus . . . but for now, building 7 is uniquely timely).

Finally, no, I am not the leader of the 9/11 truth movement. Indeed, I don't even really believe in having leaders. My philosophy is "the best idea wins", and I don't care whether it is your idea, my idea or someone else's idea.

If you agree with this essay, please follow it. If you don't, that's fine . . . but please explain why not.

TNRA 22 August 2008

August 22, 2008, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

24 August 2008 | Permalink | comments: 41
By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement, NIST, WTC7 ]

On tonight's show we present in in-depth analysis of the NIST WTC 7 Investigation, with engineer and registered member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 TruthJohn Bursill.

Information relevant to tonight's show:

Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

AE911Truth Press Conference 8/21/08 Response to NIST Final Report on WTC 7

NIST Press Release

Report and Recommendations for Improving Building Safety Released for Comment
August 21, 2008 | Related Documents

Shyam Sunder, NIST lead investigator

GAITHERSBURG, Md.—The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, was primarily due to fires, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced today following an extensive, three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation. This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building, the agency stated as it released for public comment its WTC investigation report and 13 recommendations for improving building and fire safety.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event,” said NIST WTC Lead Investigator Shyam Sunder. “Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down.”

Page 91 of 111 pages ‹ First  < 89 90 91 92 93 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments


you said your source for the fact that persistent contrail conditions are unusual and rare are “common sense and NASA”, with this link attached:

Where does this paper say that persistent contrail conditions are rare? Is there a quote?

Common sense can’t tell you the frequency of supersaturation conditions in the upper troposphere.

You said: “now find something that shows conditions conducive to persistent contrails that cover the whole sky over my house for days on end”

For that I would need to know the location of that house.

By Josh on 2012 11 09 - 18:24:53
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

No. English is my first language. I wish I could write with the same fluency in Greek. And bear in mind that English is not Josh’s first language. My prejudices tend to be pro-German. Josh, who is German,he says, makes it hard for me to believe the nice things that I want to believe about Germans, such as for example that the world may (MAY) have been a less bad place now if the Germans had won The First World War. This is a useless idea of course, but are our useful ideas really any more useful?

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 09 - 17:46:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

They are determined to continue doing this until the old generations who remember what the sky once looked like have passed away and new generations have come onto the scene, generations educated in “contrail science” as part of their school curriculum (supplementing corporate media “education”) and taught to distinguish “the different categories of aircraft condensation trails.”

A fascinating and informative subject for schoolchildren, no?

In the US the approach has been, and perhaps will be, different: geoengineering is “normal”.

In Europe the line could be taken that none of this is “deliberate” spraying, just regrettable inadvertent by-products of modern aviation) some of which may even indeed have their uses for mitigating climate change, which unfortunately cannot be dealt with in any other way owing to lack of political will in the population and the influence of the bad climate change sceptics.

Meanwhile the climate change sceptics will slowly morph into advocates of geoengineering, and nobody will remember that they once denied the existence of the problem that solar radiation management is alleged to address. (But perhaps they, or some of them, will even continue as climate change sceptics. The “pluralism” of the liberal democratic political system, with its systematic cultivation of “freedom of speech” means that public acceptance can be secured for internally contradictory policies: governance in the simultaneous service of warring lobbies.) 

There is a simple underlying principle in this pluralism: you can believe and say whatever you like, as long as it is untrue. The simplicity of this principle is what makes it possible for people of limited capacity like Josh to implement it with impressive consistency.

And after all the pre-Christian world functioned on this basis for thousands of years. 

So here we are again, meagain, “feeding the troll”, making friend Josh the centre of the debate and the centre of the universe.  Aren’t we clever?

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 09 - 16:35:29
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

it is hardly controversial, and beyond argument that there are spraying programs occurring today, as they have in the past.

tinyurl (dot) com/bgpc6of

anyone truly seeking facts and information on this matter, with the ability to use an internet search engine, would be able to find countless more examples of such evidence.

tinyurl (dot) com/d6w7hr7

given the growing inundation on the internet of pictures and videos and comments from concerned people all over the world, how can people like fenton and josh say that NONE of this is anything to be concerned about

how does josh/fenton presume to convince anyone with their unqualified opinion, speaking on behalf of no official authority whatsoever, that what concerns people all over the world, is a perfectly normal phenomenon -

josh avoids the question he posed himself..

Q: “How do you tell the difference?”

A: he doesnt, he just sticks his head a little further up, and tells the world they are imagining things.

By meagain on 2012 11 09 - 11:36:06
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Do you have a source for that finding?

yeah, common sense and NASA

tinyurl (dot) com/bntk6d7

I did a very quick search and found this,

so? you want a medal because you can operate a keyboard? if youre that clever you couldve found that NASA link yourself..  anyway, now find something that shows conditions conducive to persistent contrails that cover the whole sky over my house for days on end.. and i might listen to you..  otherwise, stop trying to tell me what im looking at,  especially when youre not even looking at it - idiot.

Regarding the video you linked, it obviously shows a busy flight path.

obviously? i see the same thing above my house, and i dont live under a busy flight path…

The wide-spread contrail is most likely quite old.

most likely?  again, ive witnessed such things spreading quite quickly   - right above my house.. as ive said before, all you need do is open your eyes.

unless you are trying to suggest there is absolutely no spraying of any kind going on anywhere in the world, how do you tell the difference numpty?

dont answer that, i dont care for any more of your unqualified stupid opinion, and id have a much more logical discussion with a snail than you.




By meagain on 2012 11 09 - 10:05:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Correction: the paper about supersaturation I linked in the last post was about the summer 2003, not 2008.

By the way, this was one of the hottest summers ever in Europe where the observations were made.

By Josh on 2012 11 09 - 09:57:57
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Meagain said:

“persistent lingering, possibly spreading contrails, may exist, but, it is not usual, in fact , it can properly be described as a RARE event”

Do you have a source for that finding?

I did a very quick search and found this, where the atmosphere was observed for a limited time span (summer 2008):

Quoting from the abstract:

Thin ice clouds were particularly ubiquitous in high pressure systems. The radiosonde data showed that the upper troposphere was very often supersaturated with respect to ice.

Of course, they are giving numbers later in the paper:

About 60% of all radiosonde profiles measured in August and September 2003 showed supersaturation in the upper troposphere (8–13 km).

At least during the observation period of that paper, conditions favourable for persistant contrails were not rare.

Regarding the video you linked, it obviously shows a busy flight path.
The ATC separates planes going in opposite directions at least by 1000 feet. As stated earlier (I had linked a Skew-T diagram), the vertical variation of humidity conditions may easily allow planes at different level to produce contrails with varying life spans.

The wide-spread contrail is most likely quite old. It can be assumed that the contrail created by the plane entering from left might have persisted and spread as well.

By Josh on 2012 11 09 - 08:11:38
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

O.K., they do exist. How do you know which is a chemtrail then?

simple observation - how many times have i told you to look up!

dont you bother with links when posted? (By meagain on 2012 11 08 - 12:07:40)

fact is, persistent lingering, possibly spreading contrails, may exist, but, it is not usual, in fact , it can properly be described as a RARE event - requiring specific meteorological conditions.

when it is happening, from morning to dusk ( and possibly overnight but more difficult to observe ) day after day, regardless of suitable weather conditions, ( proven by the fact that other planes are observed as well in the same area NOT leaving trails ie; not conducive weather conditions ) and being reported all over the world, by planes that are at times not even flying on normal commercial flight paths, ( easily checked on flight tracking websites..) well then you can be sure, you are seeing something other than normal contrails.

so, if under the right conditions, you get a normal contrail that might persist a little , it might be a little hard to pick it from the ground, from something that is more nefarious in nature, but to suppose that the sheer volume of trails that are rightly causing concern to millions of people worldwide, ( including even ordinary guys with only basic levels of education, but with a functioning frontal lobe and intellectual integrity, a willingness to look at facts and evidence, ,) that this is in any way normal, would be as idiotic as believing your ears are gills and you can breathe underwater with them..  ( give it a go.. i dare ya )

now if you have any more questions, perhaps try google, theres a heap of information out there, but something tells me youre not genuine in your search for answers, and i for one, am quite sick of you offering only your unqualified opinion over and over and over again…  youre very boring you know.

By meagain on 2012 11 08 - 20:40:04
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Wayne Hall,

I posted a comment to your link. It’s up to you if you want to discuss that comment or not.

Surely you don’t intend to limit my freedom to post?

By Josh on 2012 11 08 - 20:23:09
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

There are obviously people lurking here who are willing to join the discussion when signs emerge (however briefly and deceptively) that there is some hope of emancipating it from domination by the idees fixes of one person (perhaps two people) people who post(s) here.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 08 - 19:31:07
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.