Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA

Latest LIVE show

Hereward Fenton

January 17, 2015
In today's show we look at two free speech issues which highlight a paradox in the discourse prevalent in modern democracies. Get the podcast »

Listen Live or Call In !

Recent News & Podcasts

Cynthia McKinney Green Party Presidential candidate acceptance speech

17 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Cynthia McKinney Green Party Presidential candidate speaks at the Convention By Craig Seeman
View in HD  Download 720p HD Version  Visit Craig Seeman's ExposureRoom Videos Page
Cynthia McKinney & Rosa Clemente Press Conference after Green Party Presidential, Vice Presidential By Craig Seeman
View in HD  Download 720p HD Version  Visit Craig Seeman's ExposureRoom Videos Page

McKinney wins Green Party nomination

14 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Cynthia McKinney has won the presidential nomination of the Green Party of the United States.

 

This excellent video is from 2007 when Cynthia began her association with the Greens.

 

Her passion, intelligence and heroism is unparalleled in contemporary politics.

 

During this speech Cynthia reaffirms her commitment to truth and justice on many issues, including the assassination of Martin Luther King Jnr, co-intel subversion of the civil rights movement, the September 11th atacks and the Iraq War.

 

She documents here how the power elites behind the political process went about to destroy her career in the Democratic Party.

 

With her nomination by the Greens it looks like a new chapter is opening for Cynthia, for America and for the world.

 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2508693105235438933

 

By JEFFRY SCOTT
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 07/12/08

http://www.ajc.com/...mckinney_green_nomination.html

 

CHICAGO — Former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney reassumed the national political stage Saturday, winning the presidential nomination of the Green Party of the United States at the party's national convention here.

 

Amid chants of "Paint The White House Green" and signs proclaiming, "Truth. McKinney 2008," McKinney revved up a crowd of about 350 Green Party delegates from 38 states who elected her on the first ballot.

 

"I am asking you to vote your conscience, vote your dreams, vote your future, vote Green," McKinney told the convention in a 30 minute speech following an address by her running mate, hip hop artist and political activist Rosa Clemente.

 

She was joined by her father, former Georgia representative Billy McKinney; her mother Leola, and her son Coy, on the stage in the elegant Michigan Avenue hall where the Chicago Symphony Orchestra performs,

 

McKinney, 53, was the odds-on favorite to win the nomination, coming into the convention with a 10-1 delegate lead over her closest rival, Jesse Johnson of West Virginia.

 

Since last fall, McKinney has campaigned in 30 states on the slogan "Power To The People" and a platform that calls for single-payer universal health care, the immediate withdrawal of American forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, the creation of a Department of Peace, and reparations for African-Americans.

 

In her address, Clemente, 36, vowed that she and McKinney would fight all "-isms and ideologies that divide us." Clemente jokingly threw down a challenge to the nation's sitting vice president: "Dick Cheney, bring it on."

 

In her unlikely re-emergence on the national political stage as the presidential nominee of the Green Party, which she joined in 2007 after leaving the Democratic Party where she had served six terms representing DeKalb County's 4th Congressional district, McKinney faces a stiff – extremely long-shot – run at the presidency.

 

She as much conceded winning the presidency was not her goal in her speech Saturday. She said the thrust of her campaign would be to get 5 percent of the vote in November, effectively establishing the Greens as a third party that would not have to fight state-by-state to get on the ballot every four years.

 

"We are in this to build a movement," said McKinney to roars from the crowd. "A vote for the Green Party is a vote for the movement that will turn this country right-side-up again."

 

In Georgia, because the party failed to qualify under state laws, McKinney and Clemente will not be on the ballot in November. Green Party leaders expect she will be on the ballot in 36 states, where ballot qualification rules vary.

 

David Cobb, who ran for president on the Green Party ticket in 2004 – and pulled in just 0.1 percent of the vote – said Saturday that one of the appeals of McKinney' as a candidate is her name recognition.

 

"Before she has even won the nomination, she has pulled new members into the party," said Cobb, who introduced McKinney at the convention, praising her work in Congress and for having introduced articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Secretary of State Condolezza Rice. He estimated Green Party membership is about 500,000.

 

McKinney is the second former member of Congress from Georgia mounting a presidential run this year. Former 7th District Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.) is running for president on the Libertarian Party ticket.

 

A lighten-rod political figure, McKinney was defeated in 2006 by the 4th District's present congressman, U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), after a much-publicized run-in with a U.S. Capitol police officer and her accusations that the Bush administration covered up information about the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

 

That incendiary quality seemed to endear McKinney to Green delegates who, throughout the convention, inveighed against the "crimes" of the Bush administration and the distortions of the news by "corporate media" – which, except for the cable network C-SPAN, have given little coverage to the convention.

 

"Don't expect me to keep a count of the major flip flops of the other candidates between now and November, I'm sure there will be plenty," McKinney told the crowd. "They are in this flip flop because they have to appear to share our values — while they serve somebody else."

 

 

Movie Review - “The Reflecting Pool” by Nathan lee

13 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

I post this article not because it has any merit, but rather to illustrate the depths of depravity to which the hack writers employed by major media organisations will sink in order to stifle dissent and discredit the voices of reason and justice.

 

This article borders on defamation.

 


 

Trade Secrets
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/movies/11refl.html?_r=1&ref=movies&oref=slogin

 

By NATHAN LEE
Published: July 11, 2008

 

The problem with “The Reflecting Pool,” an investigative drama that mucks around with 9/11 conspiracy theories, is not that its ideas are silly. Strictly from an imaginative point of view, there is something unnerving about the weirdly elegant way the towers fell. And not just the north and south buildings but also the adjacent 7 World Trade Center, a smaller edifice, suffering much less damage, that collapsed in an identical manner but received far less coverage from — what’s the phrase I’m looking for? — oh yes: a complicit, propaganda-foisting media/industrial complex in the pocket of the Bush administration and the Jews and the oil industry!

 

Er, to continue. The problem, which dwarfs whatever you might feel about the topic, is in the drama, or utter lack thereof. Written and directed by Jarek Kupsc, the movie has the tone, rhythm and structure of a set of numbered, handwritten notes derived from 9/11 conspiracy Web sites, photocopied at Kinko’s and distributed at an anarchist bookshop.

 

This pamphlet narrative follows the efforts of Alex Prokop (Mr. Kupsc again), an investigative journalist for a lefty magazine about to “go corporate,” and Paul Cooper (Joseph Culp), a 9/11 obsessive whose daughter died in the attack, to unearth the truth in the face of suppressed information, disturbing ambiguities and, when needling the powers that be, their own amateurism.

 

9/11 families remains lawsuit dismissed

12 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

SBS: Tuesday, 8 July, 2008
http://news.sbs.com.au/..._lawsuit_dismissed_551219

 

A US judge has dismissed a case brought by families of victims of the September 11 attacks who said the city denied proper burials by sending debris containing possible human remains to a garbage dump.

 

The lawsuit, filed in 2005 by a group called WTC Families for a Proper Burial, sought to have the estimated 1.2 million to 1.8 million tonnes of rubble originally from the World Trade Centre site transferred out of the Fresh Kills landfill located on New York's borough of Staten Island.

 

The families said the city should move the residue that had been finely sifted multiple times to a more suitable location and have a cemetery created.

 

US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, saying the city's decisions about where to offload the debris "were difficult and complicated", found the city had "acted responsibly" in bringing about a "swift and efficient recovery from the terrorists' attack".

 

"Plaintiffs have no property right in an undifferentiated, unidentifiable mass of dirt that may or may not contain the remains of plaintiffs' loved ones," he said.

 

There are no New York laws that require burying the debris in a different location, he said, "however worthy the citizen and however honourable the deceased".

 

About 1,100 out of the 2,749 people killed at the World Trade Centre site perished without leaving a trace. Full bodies were recovered for only 292 victims and partial remains for 1,357, sometimes only a fragment of a bone, the ruling noted.

 

Almost immediately after the attacks, all visible human remains were removed from the debris, bagged and taken to collecting points.

 

Victims' families argued that debris surrounding some remains would have contained other bone fragments and remains.

 

The president of the WTC Families, Diane Horning, lost her son, Matthew Horning, in the attacks. His wallet and a piece of his occipital bone were recovered from debris at Fresh Kills.

Hellerstein concluding his ruling by suggesting a "beautiful nature preserve" and memorial at the garbage site and said the families of victims "have suffered a wrong for which there can be no remedy".

 

"No matter the authority and power of this court, it cannot bring back the loved ones lost, and it cannot bring peace to the plaintiffs or surcease to society's collective grief around the events of September 11, 2001."

 

Source: AAP  

 

TNRA 10 July 2008

July 10, 2008, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

11 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 7

Categories: [ ]

correction: It was claimed on the show that the gardasil vaccine contains "live virus". According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gardasil is a "recombinant" vaccine and contains no live virus.

Another long show this week - there is so much to talk about these days!

Today we have a special guest, John Bursill, who heads up www.truthaction.org.au, an 9/11 truth activist organisation currently making strong headway with the NSW Greens, making the case for a new investigation of the events of 11 September 2001.

John gives us a breakdown of his involvement in the 9/11 truth movement, and we get into an animated discussion of the recent BBC production: The Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower.

For more information about Truth Action Australia you may contact John Bursill directly by email or phone him on +61 414 878499.

In the second half of the show we are joined by the redoubtable Dan Collins, with whom we discuss a number of news topics on the Australian front.

Links for today's show:

Simplify Garnaut report findings: ACT Oppn
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/07/08/2297165.htm
The ACT Opposition says Labor governments must simplify the Garnaut report's findings so the public can more easily digest its conclusions.

Porn block trial complete
http://m.news.com.au/ITTopStories/fi211676.htm
THE federal government has completed a trial of blocking pornography and other online content deemed inappropriate for children at the internet service provider level.

The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/7330169.stm

The Conspiracy Files delves into the final mystery of 9/11: a third tower at the World Trade Centre, which along with the Twin Towers, also collapsed that day. But this skyscraper was never hit by a plane.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4576154575407650292

Teen arrested for 'blasphemous T-shirt'
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23919553-2,00.html
A GOLD Coast teenager who wore a T-shirt by English extreme metal band Cradle of Filth that reads 'Jesus is a c**t' has been charged with offensive behaviour.

Solicitor charged after intervening in drug search at pub
http://www.smh.com.au/...drug-search-at-pub/2008/07/06/1215282652761.html
A SOLICITOR and civil liberties campaigner was arrested, handcuffed and allegedly had his rib broken by police after offering legal assistance to a man being searched in public.

MP blocked from shopping centre demands change
http://www.smh.com.au/...demands-change/2008/07/06/1215282652779.html
GARY GRAY was on the hustings last year when he was confronted by a serious hurdle to democracy in the 21st century. He was denied entry to a shopping centre.

Cancer vaccine linked to illness in women
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23974632-2,00.html?from=public_rss
THE new cervical cancer jab is believed to be behind a huge jump in the number of women and girls suffering bad reactions to vaccinations .

Warm regards to all listeners from the TNRA team!


Josh & Hereward

Seymour Hersh On Covert Operations In Iran

10 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92025860

Listen online

In this candid interview Seymour Hersh discusses false flag operations in Iran and the erosion of democracy in the US.

The interview is exceptional in its engagement with the fascist shift now well advanced in the United States.

Highly recommended.

From NPR:

"Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh believes that the United States may be closer to armed conflict with Iran than previously imagined. He writes about Congress' funding of covert military operations in the upcoming issue of The New Yorker.

A regular contributor to The New Yorker, Hersh exposed the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in a series of articles published in the magazine early in 2005.

During the Vietnam War, Hersh was the first to report on the My Lai massacre. He has been the recipient of the Pulitzer Prize, five George Polk Awards, two National Magazine Awards, and a dozen other prizes. He is also the author of eight books, including Chain of Command about Abu Ghraib."

The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower

09 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/7330169.stm

 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4576154575407650292

 

The Conspiracy Files delves into the final mystery of 9/11: a third tower at the World Trade Centre, which along with the Twin Towers, also collapsed that day. But this skyscraper was never hit by a plane.

 

The 47-storey tower collapsed seven hours after the Twin Towers and it has become the subject of heated speculation and a host of conspiracy theories which suggest it was brought down by a controlled demolition.

 

Nearly seven years on, the final official report on the World Trade Centre is due to be published in July.

 

Official investigators are expected to conclude that fire caused the collapse of this third tower at the World Trade Centre. But that makes this the first and only skyscraper in the world to collapse solely due to fire.

 

The Conspiracy Files explores many unanswered questions to try to find out what really happened, and why some people think there was a sinister plot to destroy the building.

 

Produced and Directed by Mike Rudin
Assistant Producer: James Giles

 

 

Truth Rising: the 9/11 Chronicles

09 July 2008 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

www.infowars.com/truthrising

 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6558849874454763730

 

Seven years after the attacks of September the Eleventh, a global awakening has taken place, the likes of which the world has never seen. As the corporate-controlled media dwindles into extinction, a new breed of journalists and activists has emerged.

Join Alex Jones, Luke Rudkowski and others as they set out on a mission determined to expose the ruthless global elite, and alert the masses to the truth about 9/11.

Strap in and get ready to ride along as criminal overlords David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Alan Greenspan, John McCain, and many others are confronted about their lies and manipulation.

Including interviews with Jesse Ventura, Rosie O'Donnell, George Carlin, Willie Nelson and Martin Sheen, this film is unlike anything you have ever seen. the only question after viewing it is, will you become part of the Truth Rising.

 

The documentary provides an in-depth look at the plight of 9/11 first responders, many afflicted with serious health problems from the toxicity of Ground Zero. Truth Rising reveals and challenges the astounding arrogance and negligence of the government in regard to the heroic efforts of first responders, police, and fire-fighters. Truth Rising indicts the administration of Rudy Giuliani and that of the EPA and Christine Todd Whitman, who proclaimed the air in lower Manhattan was safe to breathe, contrary to numerous warnings to the contrary.

 

Page 91 of 108 pages ‹ First  < 89 90 91 92 93 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments

Here is some elaboration of the problem. 

The Greeks (perhaps not only the Greeks) have a saying that the fish rots from the head down. One of the side-effects of the mandatory and planet-wide duplicity that has been imposed in an awesomely systematic manner around these subjects of chemtrails/geoengineering/HAARP/weather modification is that every neighbourhood sociopath on the planet, aided and abetted by the Internet, is able to conceive of himself (we usually speak of males) as potential planetary saviour and certainly as someone who is necessary to the world.

Look at this interview with Pat Mooney taken in Italy by the chemtrails activist Maria Heibel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXNRB8NxD7o&feature=player_embedded

Mooney tells some lies, about chemtrails, and about chemtrails activists. Maria Heibel is fairly gentle on him, but less gentle than I would have been if I had been interviewing him, because if I were interviewing him (and perhaps I will do so in future) what I would talk to him about would be why climate change sceptics are unwilling to hold public discussions with him about geoengineering. After all, he is not a “conspiracy theorist” and not an untouchable. We tried to organize one such a discussion with the climate change sceptic John Christy, but Christy declined the invitation and tried to fob us off onto a similarly sceptic colleague, who did not even reply.
(to be continued)

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 07 - 16:27:12
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

blah blah blah josh… stfu already..  you really are one who likes the sound of their own voice arent you?

you seem to feel people owe you explanations and answers for some reason.

ill spell it out for you lumpen..

interrogation : “let’s return to your chemtrail epiphany moment.”

how about.. NO. how about you just post some real evidence that proves there is nothing the millions of people worldwide have concerns about, is of no concern.

provocation : you continually pretend you are some sort of authority on this matter, and offer nothing of substance except your own unqualified opinion, ad nauseam!

not everyone is as stupid as you and fenton, and your attempts at discussing anything except facts through obfuscation, hair splitting, arguing technical minutia..  are transparently obvious - youre not fooling anyone.

no one owes you anything, no explanations, and no answers.. and no one is asking you anything.

youve said what you have to say.. countless times. fine.. we know youre too stupid to see or care whats going on around you, youve explained that sufficiently..

unless you have something else, that youve not said before.. its totally unnecessary to keep repeating yourself.

this comment doesnt require an answer or acknowledgement, and im not requesting one.

By meagain on 2012 11 07 - 10:59:14
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Wayne Hall,

furthermore there might have been a misunderstanding. I did not have “interrogation” in mind when I wrote about the accusation.

I referred to your claim that I somehow had provoked Skywatcher/Meagain. Again, my wording should have been clearer.

By Josh on 2012 11 07 - 10:20:33
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Wayne Hall,

what I wrote was not meant as an insult. I may have been trying to be sarcastic though, which I regret now because I’m well aware that the issues we are ‘fighting’ over here have no small meaning for you.

I will try to keep my wording less feather-headed in future posts.

By Josh on 2012 11 07 - 09:58:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Your “chemtrail epiphany” remark was insulting and was in its way as much of an accusation as the word “interrogation”. I am not going to move on to counterattack as I have been in the habit of doing in the past, because I want to conserve energy for more useful purposes than posting here.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 07 - 07:32:02
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Wayne Hall said:

“... interrogation ...”

If you are accusing someone, you should be prepared to back up the accusation.

“... familiar and uninteresting hypotheses of a worthless person”

Instead of falling back to insults too, why don’t you point out the errors in the ‘hypotheses’?

By Josh on 2012 11 07 - 05:38:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

To those here who checked Hereward’s first source: (shared/media/document/AFD-051013-001.pdf)
Do you think the US airforce ever engages in disinformation?
And for those who looked into the sources for that pdf:
I wonder, does the IPCC ever lie?
No and No, probably. I have every faith in the veracity of all information from the US airforce and the IPCC.
I’m glad they could assuage my concern for our atmosphere. It’s not deliberately added Al, Ba or Sr in the atmosphere - what a spurious notion! It’s CO2, isn’t it. Just like the IPCC told us.
Well, I’m glad that we’re paying a tax to fix the problem. Good ol’ IPCC. Thank my lucky stars.

By ChrispyT on 2012 11 06 - 22:20:17
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

I second meagain. I am not interested in “discussion”, i.e. interrogation designed at confirming familiar and uninteresting hypotheses of a worthless person.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 11 06 - 19:08:33
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Meagain,

if you want a discussion, stop the insults and humiliations. Simple as that.

how stupid are you? ive told you before ive absolutely zero interest in your unqualified opinion. you might like to stop being so hypocritical though and try some of your own advice.

By meagain on 2012 11 06 - 18:55:26
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Wayne Hall,

let’s return to your chemtrail epiphany moment. I gather from your tale that you supported the peace movement and that you took a critical stance regarding the military or even the government(s).

When you discovered your first chemtrails over Aegina, how did you arrive at the conclusion that what you saw was spraying of chemicals?
Had you read about chemtrails before?

Did your political view have any influence on your conclusion?

By Josh on 2012 11 06 - 18:48:45
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Categories