LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!
The Truth Now Tour - OZ 2008 - Confirmed!
We are pleased to announce the first International 9/11 Truth Event in the Southern Hemisphere. This travelling conference will include presentations in several major Australian cities, including, but not limited to:
Perth - 23rd & 24th of February 2008
Sydney - 1st and 2nd of March
All tour locations will have a premier screening of the Australian documentary ShadowPlay – 9/11, Deception and Dominion by Gillian Norman.
The timing of this conference is made all the more exciting by the fact that we expect to have a change of government here by Christmas. There has been a massive swing against the conservative government of John Howard, who is likely to lose his own seat at the forthcoming election. Australia has been a major ally to the US over many decades but the Howard government has set a new standard in sycophantic "me too" policies which have turned Australia into nothing more than a vassal state, without even the promise of protection from Big Brother across the Pacific. It is our fervent hope that we can reverse the brutal zeitgeist which has led to draconian "anti-terror" legislation and demonisation of so called "enemy combatants", while at the same time prosecuting criminal wars overseas.
9/11 Truth can bring clarity, resolution and reconciliation in this troubled time. Let's hope we can awaken Australians en masse to the factual reality that 9/11 was not as we have been told and that the enemy is not some shadowy "Other" but rather lurks within our own power structures. John Howard was in Washington DC on the morning of 9/11. This man and his inner circle - Downer, Ruddock and Costello may ultimatey be held to account for their collaboration with a criminal regime. This conference may be a first step on that road for all of us.
At this stage there is still much that is unconfirmed, however we do have confirmations from the following individuals:
- Hero and the "Last man out", William Rodriguez
- Highly respected physicist, Dr Steven Jones
- Congressional Candidate, aerospace expert and truth activist, Lt Col Bob Bowman PhD
- Renowned historian and author, Webster Griffin Tarpley
- Canadian media critic and author Barrie Zwicker
- Rowland Morgan, co-author of "9/11 revealed"
- Scientist, Depleted Uranium Expert and Global outlook contributing editor, Loren Moret.
- Attorney, scientist, peace activist and scholar Dr Alfred Webre
- Australian architect, associate engineer, senior lecturer and member of ae911truth, Dr David Leifer
Unconfirmed but hopeful:
- Dr Frank Legge
- Dr David Ray Griffin
I have also been advised that:
"We have a few celebrities wishing to attend, with one American sporting star confirmed to be coming out of the Truth Closet at the opening event in Perth."
I hope to have more definite information soon. In order to keep up to date with the developments please join our mailing list.
9/11 Truthers Respond to Bill Maher
9/11 Truthers give comedian Bill Maher a dose of his own medicine.
Noam Chomsky: “If 9/11 Was An inside Job ... Who Cares!”
This story on alternet.org is currently going supernova. It is worth going to the page just to read the comments which are far more intelligent than anything doddery old Noam has said in years.
To me the video proves the total moral and intellectual bankruptcy of the "left gatekeeper" mentality. Only a severely damaged mind could assert that nobody cares about who was reponsible for the worst terrorist attack the world has ever seen.
The legendary linguist and activist explains why he's highly skeptical about Bush Administration involvement in perpetrating 9/11.
While acknowledging that he may be out-of-step with many of his colleagues on the left, Chomsky talks about why he doesn't believe that 9/11 was an "inside job." Among other things he believes that some aspect of the plan would have leaked and too many events on that day were too elaborate to have been planned to perfection and therefore would not have been worth the risk for the Bush Administration. However, he also speaks of how the attacks were the best thing to ever happen to corrupt regimes throughout the world.
Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement
For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's population, while enabling the "elites" to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity's extermination: Operation ENDGAME.
Jones chronicles the history of the global elite's bloody rise to power and reveals how they have funded dictators and financed the bloodiest wars—creating order out of chaos to pave the way for the first true world empire.
Watch as Jones and his team track the elusive Bilderberg Group to Ottawa and Istanbul to document their secret summits, allowing you to witness global kingpins setting the world's agenda and instigating World War III.
Learn about the formation of the North America transportation control grid, which will end U.S. sovereignty forever.
Discover how the practitioners of the pseudo-science eugenics have taken control of governments worldwide as a means to carry out depopulation.
View the progress of the coming collapse of the United States and the formation of the North American Union.
A high-definition version of this film is available for download at prisonplanet.tv
Twin Towers: Demolished For Effect
Collapse footage, witness testimony, and common sense all indicate that the Twin Towers were deliberately demolished with explosives.
From the Producer:
Note how no debunkers ever address the oral histories of 503 first responders which taken as a whole offer strong corroboration to the controlled demolition hypothesis.
*** HELP THIS VIDEO GO VIRAL. VOTE IT UP ON DIGG, SEND IT TO YOUR FRIENDS, SPREAD IT AROUND HOWEVER YOU CAN. ***
Props to mkultra.tv for the montage set to the remix of Coldplay's Clocks, and to Jim Hoffman's websites 911research.wtc7.net and 911review.com for most of the concluding analysis.
LEARN THE TRUTH THEN GET OFF THE COMPUTER AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Mayday ! - Requesting Reinforcements In The Information War
I am posting this message here because I want to emphasise 4 things.
1) This website is on the front line of an info war.
2) Right now we are NOT WINNING.
3) We need you to support us, and really join the fight.
4) There are some very specific ways in which you can support this movement, and it may surprise you to find that I am NOT talking about sending us money.
Money of course is always helpful, and we will be setting up a donation page soon. However, there are other contributions which you can make that will have a much greater benefit than mere money.
Believe it or not, the single most important contribution you can make in this information war is to write thoughtful comments on the youtube videos and blog articles here, and post regularly on the 911oz forum. Also, if you see inappropriate comments on the youtube threads, click on the "Spam" link above and to the right of the comment (you need to be logged in to your youtube account to do this).
"Why is this so important?", I hear you ask. Well, I will try to explain. Please understand this is a complex topic and it may be difficult to convey this exactly, but I will try.
Firstly, and probably most importantly, you need to recognise that the enemy is already engaging us. The 911oz youtube account and the blog articles on this page are saturated with hateful, defamatory and racist statements as well as increasingly irrational fringe viewpoints such as the "No Plane" theory.
If you are very naive you will say, oh that's just "Jenny", and you may say "just ban her" or "who cares" etc...
If the above statement reflects your thoughts let me try to explain to you why you are completely misguided in thinking this way. In this info war, "Jenny" is a label for some agency which may be many different people acting in a coordinated fashion. I cannot say this for sure, but "Jenny" is bombarding us with destructive disinfo 24 hours a day. "Jenny" is very busy and very dedicated. Indeed she is in some ways more dedicated to destroying us that we are to our own cause.
That is why I am sounding the alarm. This is an out of control situation.
This page receives thousands of page views per day, but (apart from "The Watcher", "The Enforcer" and "Rabbi with a Gun" etc) you are all saying saying nothing. A big thank you to the aforementioned individual. You are doing us a very great service.
Banning her from youtube is all but impossible as she's using multiple names. I banned "trutherjen1" this afternoon and she immediately switched to "trutherjen4" ... immediately! And then she went and posted another 20 posts. She is winning folks, because she puts more energy into what she is doing than you.
She is succeeding in discrediting this movement simply because of the weight of disinformation dumps on us daily. And it does not matter that the quality of her writing is so poor, throw enough mud and some will stick as they say.
Banning users is never a solution to these kinds of situations. The only solution is to actually win the info battle by being more committed than the enemy.
Unfortunately, we do not have that level of commitment, and "Jenny" is winning. But I'm here right now in the machine gun nest and I will not stop fighting her. I will show her what real commitment means. I will be here long after she has given up and I will shoot down dozens more like her.
I give you my word.
Naomi Wolf - The End of America & The Ten Steps to Fascism
A disturbing, inspiring talk by Naomi Wolf, author of "The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot" given October 11, 2007 at Kane Hall on the University of Washington campus.
Sydney 9/11 Truth Action - 11th October 2007
11th October was a coming of age for the Sydney 9/11 Truth Action Group. On that day we had our first encounter with the authorities. After five months of regular appearances at the Town Hall, on this occasion we were informed by city rangers that we had committed an offence (by setting up a card table and a banner). Subsequently were we told by the police that we were required to provide detailed information and identification in order to lawfully protest.
I have not yet sighted the legislation which supports all this. Please let me know if you find a web page with this information.
Massive Civil Disobedience and Arrests in DC, Sept 15, 2007
They wanted to deliver a letter. They were blocked by storm troopers.
I have a question: did anybody see this on TV .. or read about it in the paper? Please leave your comment below.
Greg Palast apologizes to Dr. Steven Jones: “An apology and hope for reasoned discourse”
Steven Jones (including emails from Greg Palast)
click here to view the original PDF article
Greg Palast responded to me on 9 Aug 2007: "An apology and hope for reasoned discourse " For the record, here is the exchange (in brief – several people had input to Greg and I including Peter Phillips, David Ray Griffin, Jack Blood, “Galen”, and Ron Rattner).
1. Dr. Jones email to Greg Palast (12 June 2007): Dear Mr. Palast, On May 10, 2007, in an INN TV interview, you made statements which were blatantly defamatory when you called me, by name, a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake." I demand either a retraction or substantiation of your accusations --publicly.
A lawyer friend affirms that your statements, available here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=r2oFTiEpIBQ , constitute "malicious defamation."
You taunted: "Mr. Jones, come at me!" Here I am.
I am ready to respond to your specific objections to my papers, or issues you wish to raise which support the "official story" of the Bush/Cheney administration, after you have first verified that you have actually read what I have written on the subject of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center:
I will respond then to your statements which support the Bush/Cheney or "official story" for 9/11 events, and I will assure that the exchange will be made public. I propose publication of our exchange in the letters section of the Journalof911Studies.com, but you may choose another venue which is open to the public. Be sure to include your explanation of the iron-aluminum-rich microspheres which I discovered in the WTC dust if your explanation differs from mine, as well as the rapid straight-down collapse of WTC 7.
Again, my lawyer friend describes your public remarks on INN on May 10, 2007, as "malicious defamation" and I think he is correct. Do you? You called me a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake." I maintain that I am of sound mind and not a fraud. However, I invite you to present your substantiation of these claims --or retract your egregious defamations.
Sincerely,Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
PS --If you do not respond by July 25, 2007, I will consider other options. Thank you.Note that there are over one hundred engineers and architects listed in the Architects andEngineers for 9/11 Truth web site, ae911.org, along with many at the stj911.org site, soyou may wish to correct your mis-statement of last month that there are "no engineers"who challenge the official story.
2. Since Greg did not respond by July 25th (as requested), I wrote another email to himon July 27th, as follows: Dear Mr. Palast, I found and looked at the video clip from your interview on INN --where you refer to me by name, publicly, as a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake". You also say, to the camera and the public: "Mr. Jones, come at me!"
I wrote to you over a month ago (via INN), asking for a retraction --or at the very least, some substantiation for your hubris and slander. I received word back that you have backed off your assertion that I, a PhD physicist, am a "fruitcake." It's a start...
I'm ready to accept your offensive and public challenge --your unsubstantiated accusation that I am a "complete and utter fraud" --and hopefully this discussion can bring the 9/11 truth debate before a wider public audience.
I'm raring to go! Let's discuss options, shall we?
1. A lawsuit against you for slandering me publicly. All proceeds (in excess of court and lawyer costs) would go to Iraqi war refugees = victims of the 9/11 treachery, if I win. 2. A public debate on INN (where you spoke). 3. A written exchange --Letters to the Journal of 9/11 Studies, for example. That would be the most consistent with scientific tradition --you write up your substantiated reasons for making your statements and I will publish my response. I don't think you can do it! But give it a go: you should refute the 13 points I raised in my first paper on 9/11, as well as the supportive data I provide in my latest paper, in order to demonstrate that I'm a complete fraud as you assert. The papers are published for your convenience in the Journal of 9/11 Studies: A. http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buil... B. http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf You can pull in scientists and engineers as you wish --and then I will do the same.
I prefer choice #3.
You should also back up your claims of "no engineers" supporting my claims regarding demolition using cutter charges) of the Towers and WTC7. Note the papers by engineers in the Journal of 9/11 Studies. You should read, as background, the seventy-plus peer-reviewed papers in this Journal. Also, count over 140 members in the ae911.org (architects and engineers for 9/11 truth.) group. I can prove that this claim of yours is complete and utter nonsense by my finding just one engineer against your 'No engineers' claim --Here you go: Gordon Ross and Tony Szamboti both support the mentioned claims from my papers and are both mechanical engineers. I could name others, of course.
I'm ready to move on this --in a public venue. I've come at you, accepting your challenge. Now its your move --which choice above do you prefer? Or do you suggest an alternative? Silence on your part in view of your affront would be most cowardly and would tend to choice # 1. This might be of most benefit to the Iraqi war refugees but would also be least scientific.
Dr. Steven E. Jones
3. 29 July, Greg Palast to Steven Jones (based on a third-party email to us both, which Greg quotes to me and asks about): Dr. Jones,Do you agree with the content or sentiments of this letter copied to you, particularlyparagraphs 8 and 9 which I've placed in bold below?
[PARAGRAPHS 8 AND 9 from an email Greg and I both received:]In addition to being "gatekeepers of the left", these eight people have something else incommon: they all hail from a particular tribe whose name can not be spoken withoutinviting charges of being anti-Middle-Eastern, or, more commonly and ad nauseam, anti-Semitic. This expression, anti-Semitic, is a clever term used by people who have azealous dedication to Israel to describe anyone who doesn't share their steadfast devotionto this particular apartheid state. The implication is that one can not be critical of Israelwithout being critical of Jews and if you're critical of Jews you must be ethnocentric anddisparaging of all Semitic people. Ironically enough, Arabs make up the majority of theSemitic people . Because of this shrewd framing, criticism of Zionism, the fanaticalfidelity to an apartheid Jewish state in the "holy land" gifted to Jews by Yahweh, isimpossible.It's pretty clear at this stage of our collective investigation into the crimes of 9-11 that theperpetrators include not only elements within the USG but also individuals aligned withIsrael, be they "dual citizens" or straight up Mossad agents. Anyone wanting to protectthese criminal miscreants within the USG and the "special" (master/slave) relationship
between Israel and the USG is going to do everything in their power to discredit the people such as yourself and Doctor Jones who have put together so many of the pieces of the 9-11 puzzle. [name withheld --email sent to Jones, Palast and others]
4. Dr. Jones responds to Greg Palast.
In direct answer to your question: No, I do not. Let me make this clear.I have brought forth evidence, compelling in my opinion and that of many others, that aluminothermic cutter-charges ("thermite" charges) were used in the destruction of the WTC buildings. I have also brought out arguments regarding the time-of-fall of WTC 7 relative to the time-of-fall of building destroyed by explosive demolition --and other arguments --which point again to the use of cutter charges in the destruction of these buildings.
With regard to "whodunnit", this is beyond physics, and I do not claim to know. Yes, I have paraphrased/cited Webster Tarpley with regard to who MIGHT be involved, for this is his area of expertise and study.
As for myself, I am willing to say based on the evidence I have seen --besides the hard physical evidence which is the subject of my research in this area --that Vice President Richard Cheney should be impeached and given a fair trial. Impeachment is a peaceful and Constitutional remedy and I am exercising my rights as an American citizen in calling for this remedy. Questions regarding the beginnings of the Iraq war and 9/11 should certainly be included in those impeachment proceedings. Beyond that, I do not personally point a finger...
Now, Greg, will you address the questions I posed to you?
5. Greg Palast's reply (9 August 2007), subject line: "An apology and hope for reasoned discourse " Dr. Jones,It seems, unfortunately, that you did not receive my message sent through Peter Phillips
An article in the Guardian, Sept. 5, 2006, claims that I asserted that the 9/11/2001 attacks were "an 'inside job', puppeteered by the neoconservatives in the White House to justify the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries, inflate military spending, and expand Israel.” The article also alleges: “says Jones "We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the bottom of this.” I never spoke of this alleged notion to “expand Israel” at all, nor did I use the phrase ascribed to me, “by God,” which I consider to be profane. The entire quotation ascribed to me is NOT MINE, nor did the author (Christina Asquith) of the article interview me at all. Where her quotation came from, I do not know – but the words are not mine. I wrote to the Guardian strongly objecting to their attributing statements to me that I did not make – but received no reply nor retraction. http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1864524,00.html
and Jack Blood some weeks back. Peter and Jack, both of whom I know and respect, assure me that your research, even if I remain unconvinced by it, was thoughtful and your conclusions sincerely drawn.
My unfortunate characterization of you as a "fruitcake" was based on your assertion that Jesus met with Mayans after His resurrection -which, Peter explained to me, was not a scientific finding but a deeply held religious belief rooted in your Mormon faith…
Some of your admirers have accused me of more serious misdeeds: that I knowingly conspired in mass murder (though I understand you do not endorse this view). I am quite disturbed that commentary on the September 11, 2001 attack has become so poisoned; and as a result, reasoned discourse is just impossible.
Therefore, except for those reports on the attack in my published books and as I have reported on BBC or other established outlets, I withdraw my comments on the topic. I have decided to remove myself from the debate entirely -and leave the field to those more expert than me.
I wish you well.
6. Steve's reply to Greg, 11 August: Greg,
Thank you, apology accepted.
The subject line of your email carries some hope for future "reasoned discourse," which is what I seek. ("An apology and hope for reasoned discourse ")
The hard evidence supporting the use of planted cutter-charges in the destruction of WTC 7 and the Twin Towers is very strong and I hope you will retain at least an open mind about these matters. The corporatocracy described by John Perkins has tentacles that are being exposed as we research what really happened on 9/11. I am certainly not accusing you of complicity in any way. There are questions I would like to see posed to Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and a few others...
Sincerely, Steven E. Jones
7. “Final” email sent 13 August to Greg Palast: Dear Greg,
I would urge you to consider my published, peer-reviewed papers which I have attached for you, regarding my research on what really happened on 9/11/2001 (particularly, the evidence for intentional demolition of the Towers and WTC 7). I believe these will be mostly understandable, and I further invite you to send them to "experts" as you wish for comment on the arguments I raise.
Indeed, I invite such criticisms of CONTENT as most seem to prefer to dismiss me as a "fruitcake" without even reading my papers --can you imagine that?
Can you imagine a scholar or serious investigator taking such an ad hominem approach -especially considering what is at stake if society as a whole continues to swallow the "official" 9/11 myth?