Archives 2009/12
Welcome to the Nanny State
It appears that the new paradigm of government is that the people must be influenced by any any all means to follow the wishes of the rulers, including, but not limited to the use of "behavioural modification" techniques from applied psychology.
We ask the question: is this in any way compatible with a free society?
Related Links:
- Moronic sunscreen jingle to be played on the hour to beachgoers using council loudspeakers
- Internet filter laws need urgent public debate
- Green light for internet filter plans
- BBC health program advocates "science of persuasion" (ie. brainwashing) to change human behaviour re:climate change
- Lord Monckton adresses a Greenpeace-campaigner on global warming
- CIA pushes for air strikes in Pakistani city
To cheer you up, here's a clip of Sarah McLachlan and a bunch of kids singing John Lennon's Happy Xmas (War is Over):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWqbv6NdqXs
A climate of change is dawning (we hope)
On tonight's show we speak with two of those activists: Bill Koutalianos - a member of the Climate Sceptics Party, and Phil Davis of Truth Movement Australia.
During the show we cover some highlights from the day and discuss strategies for activism, with the aim of improving the way in which we communicate about the problems associated with climate science and social policy.
We also have some video (below) from the protest. The debate with the physicist has provoked some criticism which I believe is justified - this could could have been handled better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZj1T-7GnRw
We Are Change Sydney Meets Walk Against Warming
A group of activists met to challenge the irrational, unscientific and anti-democratic agenda of the Walk Against Warming protest march held in Sydney on 12 December 2009.
Global Warming Meltdown
Today we turn our piercing laser beam of truth on the facade of anthropogenic climate change - and burn a hole right through it to let you see the inner workings of a corrupted science.
In the first half of the show we run through the latest news in the climate change debate here in Australia and some highlights from the Copenhagen COP15 Conference.
In part 2 we bring you a detailed analysis of a startling story exposing fraudulent manipulation of raw weather data just published on wattsupwiththat.com. This article is of particular interest since it concerns Australia, and because it proves that the corruption of the scientific method in climate science goes far deeper than the "climategate" email scandal would suggest.
Related Links:
- The Smoking Gun At Darwin Zero
- We Are Change Sydney - Walk against warming 2009 - [The debate isn't over!]
- Climate change sceptics triumph
- Big Oil Behind Copenhagen Climate Scam
- Aussies swelter through hottest six months on record
- Climate science dogged by "machination, conspiracies and collusion" - IPCC adviser
- Climategate: Michael Mann points finger at Phil Jones
- Lord Monckton’s summary of Climategate and its issues
Two big events this weekend!
We have two important events coming up!
9/11 Truth Rally
As part of the ongoing campaign to expose the lies of 9/11 we will join once again thousands of activist world wide on the 11th of every month until justice!
Meet: Town Hall on George St
Time:11am until 3pm
Date: 11th of December
Contact: John Bursill 0414878499
Bring: T'shirt, sign and DVD's etc if possible
NOTE: After the civil informationing session we will gather at the Edinborough Castle Hotel for Dinner and Christmas drinks from 3:30pm. We will be there until after 8pm so join us after work and kick on until late.
Walk against Walk against warming 2009 - [The debate isn't over]
Meet: Martin Place
Time: 1:00PM
Date: 12th of December
Contact: Hereward Fenton
Bring: Flyers, DVDs and Info
Martin Place Sydney to Tarpeian Way Precinct, Botanical Gardens
Informing the general public about the other side of the debate free from cult-like conditioning by the mainstream media.
more info:
http://www.meetup.com/wearechange-oz/calendar/12039102/
Phil Davis of TMA will be coordinating this event.
Recent Comments
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.
What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?
Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?
By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?
By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.
So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.
1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?
2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?
3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?
If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.
Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.
By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh Anonymous,
You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.