Archives 2010/09
Australian 9/11 truth movement statement | 11 September 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsz_Mjjrxcw
On 11 September 11, 2010 The Sydney 9/11 truth movement gathered outside the ANZAC War Memorial in Sydney's Hyde Park.
A statement was read by David Andresen, BSc(ENG) civil
Civil Engineering UNSW Australia
Sydney, NSW -- Australia
signatory, http://www.ae911truth.org petition
For more information please visit www.911oz.com.
1,270 Architects/Engineers Reveal Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition at World Trade Center on 9/1
Yahoo News | 7 September 2010
Former US Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK) and Richard Gage, AIA, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Discuss Scientific Findings
National Press Club, Washington DC, 2:00 pm, Thursday, September 9, 2010
WASHINGTON, Sept. 7 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Thursday September 9, 2010, Gravel and Gage will host a central press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, presenting hard evidence that all three WTC skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, in NYC were destroyed by explosive controlled demolition.
Senator Gravel notes, "Critically important evidence has come forward after the original government building reports were completed."
This press conference will be webcast at AE911Truth.org and hosted concurrently in cities throughout the world.* Following the conference, there will be a mock debate during which public statements made by government investigators and other defenders of the official account will be presented and responded to in multimedia format. "They refuse to debate us in person," says Gage, "so we will let their public statements represent them."
Gage will release a media-friendly summary of his organization's findings, which are based on forensic evidence as well as video and eyewitness testimony that were omitted from official reports. He will show evidence that the WTC Twin Towers were not destroyed by jet plane impacts or fires, but by pre-set explosives and incendiaries. The non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, will also call for a grand jury investigation of government report lead engineers Shyam Sunder and John Gross of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. "They were in a position to know the evidence we have been presenting," says Gage.
Also speaking will be Florida State Professor Lance deHaven-Smith, who coined the academic term State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD). Prof. deHaven-Smith has appeared on Good Morning America, the Today Show, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw, CBS Nightly News with Dan Rather, and other national TV/radio shows.
The DC press conference will be accessible via webcast AE911Truth.org, 2:00 pm September 9, 2010.
* For information on satellite press conferences in your area, contact CongressionalOutreachTeam [at] ae911truth.org.
To arrange print/broadcast interviews, with Richard Gage, AIA, contact Tania at 510-292-4710, or via email at 1000 [at] ae911truth.org.
CONTACT: David Slesinger 410-499-5403
SOURCE Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Is Julian Assange now a target of the CIA psyops department?
We bring you tonight the sordid tale of Julian Assange in Sweden: a saga of broken condoms, scorned women and character assassination, possibly directed from on high by unseen forces who are determined to destroy the whistle blowing organisation he founded.After studying all the known facts it seems clear that Mr. Assange is definitely the victim in this sad affair, yet the media (including the "high-brow" broadsheets) continue to publish stories about Assange which prominently feature the word "rape", while dredging up trivial gossip about his sex life.
'An allegation has been reported all around the world', Assange says of the continuing Swedish legal circus. 'It's at present on six million websites. In fact one in twenty websites mentioning the word rape also mentioned my name.'
- http://rixstep.com/1/20100908,01.shtml
This remains the case even though the leaked "rape" charge was almost immediately withdrawn, and no formal charges have been laid, and despite the disingenuous attempts of crooked journalists to dispel valid and justified suspicion that this is all a product of the CIA dirty tricks department.
The propensity of the global mainstream media to act in lock-step to publish baseless slander is something which must be confronted and exposed. It is tangible proof that there is a conspiracy of the powerful running things, shaping opinion and subverting democracy and the rule of law.
We look forward to your comments and thank you for listening (:
Related Links
- The internal affairs division of the Swedish police found that the dossier on the Assange case was leaked to the media
- A WikiLeaks insider has challenged claims that co-founder Julian Assange is under threat of being dumped
- WikiLeaks sex scandal deepens as estranged son enters the fray
- WikiLeaks founder may get chop
- WikiLeaks founder rejects 'baseless' rape claims
- Chancellor to Hunt Down Leak of Assange Dossier
- 9/11 Anniversary Protest at the War Memorial | Sydney
- Vaccine Zombie video
9/11 Anniversary Protest at the War Memorial
When: Saturday 11 September 2010 | 11:00 AM
Where: War Memorial, Hyde Park, Sydney
RSVP: click here
Hi Folks,
Please join us next Saturday in protest and solidarity with the victims of 9/11.
They are the voiceless, thrown into the dustbin of history for the "greater good": 3,000 in New York, a million in Iraq, and an unknown number still to come in Afghanistan and other battlefields yet to be announced.
Ultimately they are you and me, because 9/11 was the starters' gun for an endless war against an enemy which does not exist, and which will potentially target anybody who stands in it's way. It is a deranged, psychopathic attempt on the part of a degenerate elite to create "Chaos" as a stepping stone to a new "Order", one which they are willing to kill millions to attain.
You know it, and I know it, but we absolutely have to make the effort to communicate this and try to stop it, or as Niels Harrit said, "live in shame".
Please bring banners, DVDs and flyers and please be pro-active.
I don't have time to coordinate details - so trust your own judgement and bring materials which you think are relevant.
Any questions please call me on 0415 059675.
Best regards,
Hereward Fenton
Angry in America: Inside Alex Jones’ World
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/alex-jones..radio-host/story?id=10891854
Radio Host and 'Conspiracy Theorist' Taps into Dark National Mood to Build Media Empire
Dan Harris | 2 Sep 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIF1d_cxJvk
To Alex Jones, the world is a very dark place.
"Good old Uncle Sam will stage attacks ... that's how they keep the slaves in line," the libertarian radio host says during a rant on his show. "We have to wake up and face the fact that we have a criminal government."
Jones, who sits at the helm of an independent media empire, is arguably the nation's premiere purveyor of what could be called paranoia porn.
"World government means world tyranny run by a scientific dictatorship of control freaks that want to carry out forced population reduction," he explained.
The criminal government is just one of many conspiracy theories Jones espouses -- although he thinks that term belittles his reporting. He also believes that the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center were an inside job, that President Barack Obama is an "unconstitutional criminal" and that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) runs concentration camps.
"They [FEMA] have designation sports stadiums," he said matter-of-factly, "They have designated fields, they have designated closed down prisoner of war camps for the American people during a civil uprising."
You can count on Jones to push the envelope. Take his stance on the government poisoning the water. "I have all the other government documents where the government proposes -- or government think tanks propose -- poisoning the water to dumb down the population to make them more easy to manage," Jones said.
People who monitor hate groups say they're extremely worried about Jones' growing influence. His six-day-a-week radio show and webcast reach an estimated one million people a day. On YouTube and elsewhere, Jones estimates 200 million people have seen his various documentaries, like "The Fall of the Republic," "Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement" and "The Obama Deception."
Critics Say Jones Incites Anger
In 2002, Richard McAslin, allegedly a Jones listener, snuck into a men's club in California that Jones has called, "a haven for the global elite," carrying a rifle, a handgun, a cross-bow and a sword. Last summer, another Jones fan -- a mother of three on Long Island, N.Y., named Nancy Genovese -- was arrested for allegedly taking pictures of an Air National Guard base with firearms in her car. The charges were later dropped.
Jones' critics say that by floating his highly-charged ideas at a time when the nation is already very angry and anxious, he's upping the odds for unbalanced people to do stupid things.
"I've got to report the information I see and what I believe is happening," he said. "I have a responsibility to put out."
When asked if he's worried about possibly-deranged people who listen to his show taking violent action, he went on the defensive.
"I knew when you guys called that this would be the crux of your interview and that's fine because the government is going to stage more terror attacks like it did in 1995, like it did in 2001 and try to blame it on the American people," he said.
New 9/11 video shows the WTC south tower exploding
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE7fWV2qUVU
This newly released video is a longer version of a well known newscast clip which shows a very relaxed scene only moments before the catastrophic collapse of the south tower. This clip proves that there were no warning signs before the tower collapsed and should put to rest claims that the collapse was in any way expected.
Another crucial fact we can deduce from the video is that there was a massive explosion before the tower started to collapse. Remember, light travels way faster that sound, yet the rumbling we hear actually precedes the collapse, meaning that there was a highly energetic event taking place before any external visual signs.
In short, this video shows that the south tower was blown up - there is no other way of describing it.
Indeed, the words "a huge explosion now raining debris on all of us..." are the last thing we hear from the presenter before he turns tail and runs.
Sept. 11 attacks did NOT elicit terror, but anger
http://www.psychologytoday.com/.../sept-11-attacks-did-not-elicit-terror-anger
Douglas Kenrick | 31 August 2010
What was the emotional timeline of September 11, 2010? A fascinating study of this topic was released yesterday in Psychological Science, authored by Mitja Back, Albrecht Kupfer, and Boris Egloff of Johannes Gutenberg University. The authors analyzed 6.4 million words from messages sent on 85,000 different pagers on September 11. The messages are anonymous and apparently available publicly on the internet. They sorted the messages into 5-min blocks, according to the time they were sent, and analyzed 216 time blocks. They started with messages sent at 6:45 a.m. (2 hours before the first attack) and analyzed those through the 18 hours after the attack. Using software developed by Jamie Pennebaker and his colleagues, the authors counted the percentage of words in each block related to (a) sadness (crying, grief), (b) anxiety (worried, fearful), and (c) anger (hate, annoyed).
Here’s a graph of their results.
There’s something quite interesting about those results. You’d expect an act of “terror” to elicit mostly feelings of anxiety and fear, yet as the day wore on, and the news sunk in, the reaction was primarily anger, and although people’s anxiety didn’t increase, their anger did.
We don’t want to conclude that terror isn’t part of the reaction to acts of terrorism. The authors cite other research suggesting that the attacks on September 11th did certainly elicit lots of stress. But the anger reaction tells us another, and perhaps more important, part of the story. This finding is consistent with decades of research on conflict and aggression in the laboratory: When you attack someone, it reliably elicits a counterattack.
These findings also show the folly of terrorism: The most likely reaction is a desire to counterattack. In the case of those attacks, they have certainly cost more Arab than American lives over the long haul.
Of course, the same goes for our counterattacks, every time our bombs have killed civilians, it has triggered more outrage and anger, and continued to feed back into the cycle of violence.
You don't need these new data to show that, but they are interesting in showing just how quick the reaction is; the bilateral support for Bush's decisions to start two wars in alleged response to those attacks, demonstrates that such wrath doesn't get replaced by a considered rational analysis too quickly.
Reference
Back, M. D., Kufner, A. C. P., & Egloff, B. (2010). The emotional timeline of September 11, 2001. Psychological Science.
Pennebaker J.W., Francis M.E., Booth R.J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
New video of WTC7 shows Michael Hess calling for help
http://www.newworldorderreport.com...Michael-Hess
1 September 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oArHZqyNewE
After the first World Trade Center tower is hit, Barry Jennings, a City Housing Authority worker, and Michael Hess, New York’s corporation counsel, head up to the emergency command center of the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM), which is on the 23rd floor of WTC 7. Testimony from Barry Jennings and Michael Hess has rarely been confirmed, until now. This video was just released via a FOIA (freedom of information act request) and New World Order Report has obtained and released it on the internet.
Take a look for yourself. Michael Hess, clearly visible, is stuck in the building. This corroborates the story they told that on the way down trying to evacuate the building, an explosion occurred inside of the building which trapped them. The stairway, where the explosion occurred, blew out the last floors in the stairwell. Barry Jennings gave an exclusive interview with Loose Change creator Dylan Avery where Barry stated that when he was finally found by firefighters, they stepped over dead bodies in the lobby on their way out. After the video publicly aired, Barry Jennings mysteriously died just before the BBC aired a piece about World Trade Center Building 7.
9/11 Eyewitness Testimony of Mr. David Long
28 August 2010
David Long, Eyewitness to the 9/11/2001 Attacks from Truth Action Ottawa on Vimeo.
On May 8, 2009, members of Truth Action Ottawa interviewed Mr. David Long, who was in downtown Manhattan the morning of September 11, 2001. Mr. Long recounts everything he saw and heard that morning, including multiple streams of molten metal pouring from the buildings before they fell, and the sounds of multiple explosions as the buildings came down.
Recent Comments
So, Leonard Clampett, you have just been shown how persistent contrails are formed.
Why are you pasting this crazy stuff now? Copy/Paste does not magically generate truth. That weird text is all over the net.
There is no evidence that persistent contrails are anything but persistent contrails - so, no chemtrails there.
Can you show us “these nano-technology/electrical responders”? No?
How then do you know that what you pasted is not totally bunk?
By Josh on 2013 03 01 - 04:39:47
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Hi M and K,this was posted this morning,24/01, on Max Igan’s FB wall,thought you may be interested.It’s not new news, but some may be unaware of the link between Fluoride and Chemtrails.
Very early this morning I received a message from a friend, a software designer who has worked extensively with DNA mapping, most especially mitochondrial DNA. She had just watched my latest film Trance-Formation for the first time. I thought I would share her comments with you all…
This is what she sent me…
Her: I haven’t gone to sleep yet and I just saw Trance-Formation. It blew my mind!!! If your still up, I reckon I can tell you EXACTLY what the NWO plan is and it’s all got to do with our DNA, in particular Mitochondrial DNA and they have known about this since at least 1952. This system has to be brought down yesterday!
Her: Eukarya is one of the three kingdoms that make up the total biological life for humans.This is the kingdom that is responsible for the creation of mitochondrial DNA and mitochondrial DNA is the DNA that provides the energy (battery), contains the DNA code to produce DNA material (such as proteins, enzymes, cells etc.) and is responsible for the regeneration and repair of DNA in general. Those unknown/unidentified fibres that Sophia Smallstorm talks about, have the same structure as those identified found in the Eukarya biological region of the human body.
Her: Guess what Fluoride destroys? It destroys Mitochondrial DNA at even minuscule levels. I part in 30 million destroys mitochondrial DNA which is the architect/building block for all our cells and the body.
Her: They’ve known about this since at least 1952. We’re being prepped & primed for the introduction of Transhumanism. Chemtrails introduce nano-technology/electrical responders, the wireless technology send the code/signal instructions, and the implant of the RFID chip will be the CPU where the signals/information and pulse can be controlled (switched on/off. Add that to the free energy from carbon film (the free energy film; we are all made of carbon, which is an energy store that can be switched on or off according to this new fee energy technology, reduce the body’s resistance through immunisations, and destroy the factory that reproduces and renews the body’s cells through water fluoridation and the NWO plan all fits nicely into place!!!
Me: You got it
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 01 26 - 10:54:14
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Hello Hereward ~ I too require solid evidence before I can take on any theory. Someone sent me this (lengthy) document sometime ago written by a Major in the US airforce researching the use of cloud seeding & its evolution from its beginnings in WW11 right through to 2030.
It is an unclassified document that admits to everything including the methods & chemicals used & the militarys involvement in these operations & why. It makes one wonder what the classified version would look like
It can be viewed on my Google Drive account here ~ https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxcFD5v21Uh7b1Aya2E5S3MzQlk
By tinsel777 on 2013 01 02 - 16:53:38
From the entry 'Chemtrails Revisited'.
I was insulted by the remarks Hereward made towards so called “creationists” and that by bringing them on his show it would be less scientific (“like the UFO community”). I would recommend everyone watch the presentaion called “100 reasons why evolution is stupid” by Dr Kent Hovind. I DARE Hereward to debate this man on ANYTHING scientific. By the way this man is in jail serving a ten year jail sentence in a maximum security prison for “failing” to pay his taxes. Oh and hes an ex science teacher turned reverend.
Hereward never dares to mention the foremost documentaries “Why/How in the world are they spraying” nor does he ever try to look at any of the FACTS associated with those presentaions. He dares to mention the scientific method yet states in the description that his presentaion is just the opinion of “two regular guys with basic education”.
Hey Hereward why do I have to “SUBMIT’(which means to beg) and “REGISTER” (which defines ownership of the registered) my person in order to post on your site, havent you watched any documentaries on lawful and legal differences like “Bursting bubbles of government deception” or books like “The classified files” (Thomas Anderson) and “How I clobbered every cash confiscatory agency known to man” (Mary Croft).
Thank you for your time.
By Phesage on 2012 12 23 - 20:36:31
From the entry 'Chemtrails Revisited'.
Leonard Clampett,
did you have a look into the studies that confirm supersaturation as the precondition for persistant contrails?
If you still don’t accept the existence of this phenomenon, I suggest you phrase your objections in a letter to the authors of the papers I linked previously.
The most prominent of the authors are probably Professor Hoskins of Reading University and Professor Dr.-Ing. Ulrich Schumann from the DLR (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt).
What do you think is the reason for all these scientist to incorporate supersaturation in their daily research work?
By Josh on 2012 12 12 - 04:04:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett said:
“Your calculation does not take account of the entire air mass moving through the engine. It cannot simply be ignored. 1 tonne of fuel and 58.82 tonnes of atmosphere compressed and burned equals 59.82 tonnes”
My calculation takes into account the elements that are directly involved in the combustion process. Obviously, to retrieve that 3.47 tonnes of oxygen, a lot of air has to go through the combustion chamber. But most of it is not involved in the combustion.
All this does not alter the fact that the combustion of 1 ton of fuel generates 1.37 tonnes of water that wasn’t in the atmosphere before.
By Josh on 2012 12 11 - 09:29:50
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
is my calculation correct?
If so, then for every tonne of fuel there are 1.37 tonnes of water generated.
If not, please point out the error.
By Josh on 2012 12 10 - 20:54:21
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh, by golly, I think you almost have it. A little extra stretching and presto. You are now getting toward understanding. I spoke with a professor chemistry and she agrees with me that only 1 tonne of fuel residue is exhausted from an engine following combustion of that 1 tonne, along with 58.82 tonnes of resultant matter from the compressed air that goes through the engine adding up to a total of 59.82 tonnes exhausted from the combustion process.
Josh Anonymous said”
“If you break down the relations to one tonne of fuel you get this:
1.00 t fuel and 3.47 t oxygen going in, 3.10 t carbondioxyde plus 1.37 t water coming out.
4.47 tonnes in, 4.47 tonnes out.”
Interesting Josh! I think you stumbled across the fact that fuel does not burn by itself earlier in the discussion. Your calculation does not take account of the entire air mass moving through the engine. It cannot simply be ignored. 1 tonne of fuel and 58.82 tonnes of atmosphere compressed and burned equals 59.82 tonnes of which a very small portion is water. The water was always there in the atmosphere, and came from OUTSIDE the aircraft and was heated by the combustion process, turned to steam , exhausted and condensed.
The point being - the extra weight comes from OUTSIDE. Duh!
Air is a mixture of gases
Oxygen: 20.99%
Nitrogen: 78.03%
Carbon Dioxide: 0.03%
Hydrogen: 0.00005%
Argon: 0.93%
Neon: 0.0018%
Helium: 0.0005%
Krypton: 0.0001%
Xenon: 0.000009%
= 99.982459%
Concerning Carbon Dioxide. Did you ever see the effect of having dry ice, solid carbon dioxide, in a punch bowl at a party? The dry ice is vaporising to the gaseous state, as well as condensing some water vapour in the air to produce a white fog that sinks in the air. It flows over the edge of the bowl and sinks. This shows that the carbon dioxide and cold water vapour are more dense than air. i.e. they sink. This should tell a wide awake observer that CO2, being 1.5 times the weight of air, descends when released at altitude and will not remain there to become a cloud. This is why you see real contrails that dissolve in a very short time apart from the well known fact that natures equilibrium ensures the universe remains in an overall steady state.
The ratio of fuel to air mixture for a jet engine at sea level is about 58.82 to 1, i.e. 1 tonne of fuel mixed with 58.82 tonnes of air, will emit 59.82 tonnes of hot gas which will contain a proportion of water that existed in the mixture in the first place.
A friend of mine called me yesterday from mid NSW as he was driving from Narrabri to Melbourne to tell me that he was looking at a peculiar chemtrail in the sky west of where he was parked on the highway. A circle with two crossed chemtrails situated to make it look a skull and crossbones. That is not done by either commercial or Air Force jet traffic and it would appear that as the powers-that-be have sufficient deniers like yourselves now so they believe they can do whatever they like with impunity as you assist in dividing the community with your belief that governments would never do such things to We, The People.
Josh, chemtrails are being sprayed across the globe every day. Get used to it. Any amount of information is available for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. No amount of denial will change that and arguing against it assists the agenda.
By Leonard Clampett on 2012 12 10 - 20:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett said:
“You claim that 1 tonne of fuel is converted into 1.3 tonnes of water”
Don’t forget the other substances - else the equation will indeed not add up.
Let’s add molcular masses and you will see how it works out. First, here is the combustion equation again:
2 C12H26 + 37 O2 = 24 CO2 + 26 H2O
Molecular mass of kerosene: 170.3360 g/mol
Molecular mass of an oxygen pair: 31.99886 g/mol
Molecular mass of carbondioxide: 44.00964 g/mol
Molecular mass of water: 18.01532
(All rounded)
So, the mass going into combustion is:
2 * 170.3360 + 37 * 31.99886 = 340.672 + 1183.95782 = 1524.62982 g/mol
The mass coming out of the combustion is:
24 * 44.00964 + 26 * 18.01532 = 1056.23136 + 468.39832 = 1524.62968 g/mol
The total mass is unchanged (apart from th rounding errors).
If you break down the relations to one ton of fuel you get this:
1.00 t fuel and 3.47 t oxygen going in, 3.10 t carbondioxyde plus 1.37 t water coming out.
4.47 tonnes in, 4.47 tonnes out.
If there are errors in the calculation, point them out please.
Ask your engineer friend about the combustion formula if you think it’s wrong.
By Josh on 2012 12 09 - 18:46:17
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh, Now, let me make sure I have this straight. You claim that 1 tonne of fuel is converted into 1.3 tonnes of water. Correct so far? Yes. I suggest that you keep up your subscription to the Flat Earth Society as they need the money and their membership has been dwindling for decades, even a century or two. What I can let you in on, is the fact that after an aircraft passes by, any increase in the weight of the surrounding atmosphere, which would be the result of whatever the aircraft exhausted only, would exactly equal the weight of what was exhausted “and no more”. I iterate, “and no more”. Let me reiterate, “and no more”. The engines would not burn 1 tonne of fuel and exhaust 1.3 tonnes of anything, but 1 tonne of exhaust only. Can you see the finer picture here? Nothing disappears, nothing is added, as matter only alters form. This, of course, only occurs for a very short period of time as instantly, as in space, upon exhaust, the emission is subject to, and I have explained this to you a couple of times, immediate dispersal to balance the ambient atmospheric temperature, pressure and humidity. If the ambient temperature, pressure and humidity are less than the exhaust emissions, the emissions will be instantly subject to reduction to reach equilibrium. Got the larger picture yet?
I can go through it slowly for you if that is your need. However, to add to that, it seems you have difficulty following the very simple fact that as equilibrium is the arbiter of all things in nature, everything that is introduced into the upper atmosphere is absorbed by the surrounding atmosphere, which, at 30,000 feet, extends to hundreds, if not thousands of cubic kilometres, and temperature, pressure and humidity are equalised rapidly.
I believe you should get your machine that you claim creates more than is input, and sell it to the governments across the world so they can make money. Should be worth billions to you, and the best of luck.
Just another question for you, although, as you would studied and passed examinations on Principles of Flight for gliders, you may not have had to do propellers, but you should know anyway. Can you tell me if lift always equals weight, and thrust always equals drag, in balanced flight, in the formula to calculate these aerodynamic forces? The accepted belief in this matter will demonstrate to you the inherent difficulties in following the kind of dogma you keep flogging among other dead horses.
By Leonard Clampett on 2012 12 09 - 09:13:19
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.