Archives 2011/01
Explosive Revelations From 9/11 Whistleblower Susan Lindauer on Pre 9/11 Warnings and the Iraq War
http://theintelhub...warnings-and-the-iraq-war/
16 January 2011
The Intel Hub
Alex Thomas
Today on The Intel Hub Radio, Shepard interviewed former U.S. asset Susan Lindauer. Susan worked primary in the Libyan and Iraqi embassies and warned of the 9/11 attacks months before they happened.
Susan was eventually arrested and charged under the Patriot Act as an Iraqi Agent. Essentially, the United States government turned its back on one of its most trusted assets and locked her in a Texas military prison.
Susan revealed, for the first time, Iraq’s immediate reaction to the 9/11 attacks and what they promised to do for the United States. This is explosive information that confirms our worst suspicions.
Iraq, a nation that clearly had nothing to do with the attacks, actually offered to HELP in the 9/11 investigation.
This interview and Susan’s book explains how & why 9/11 involved both hijackings and a controlled demolition. The scenario that she laid out shows both motive and opportunity.
Iraqi diplomats actually challenged the United States as to why they had failed to stop the attack after multiple warnings were given. Iraq accused the U.S. of deliberately allowing its own citizens to die so they could justify war on Baghdad.
These new revelations, coupled with the evidence of controlled demolition, paint an eerie picture leading up to the 9/11 attacks, almost as if certain government officials refused to peruse known terrorists because they knew that if they were identified their funding would lead back to government sponsored black ops.
Susan’s book, “Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover-Ups of 9/11 and Iraq” is a must read for anyone attempting to uncover the truth of one of the largest terror attacks in history. This book connects the dots in regards to pre 9/11 warnings and the major players involved in the cover up. Purchase The Book Here
Letter From America
Dear Truth News Readers,
At the time of writing I am in Austin, Texas - a beautiful city whose citizens have an amazing passion for liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

I travelled here via OKC and Dallas. During the short time I've been here I've met great people and had the opportunity to do some exclusive interviews, which are linked below.
We hear alot about the economic crisis and encroaching tyranny in the US, but the reality on the ground is much more complex. Yes there is increasing tyranny, yes there is massive homelessness, but I believe that this country still leads the way in terms of the age old quest for true human freedom, and this is bascially because the origins of the nation are steeped in the principles of the US Constitution, which is unparalleled in any other country for its championing of the rights of the individual.
Another important point: the United States is a big country with a large population. The size of the population creates both problems and opportunities which are quite different to those we are familiar with in Australia, which is a large country with a small population. For every problem brewing there is a solution in the pipeline.
It may be I am lucky to have met some passionate and principled people, but coming here makes me feel more positive about the future of humanity, which is a bit of a surprise even to me.
After Austin I'll be spending two days in New York where I'll be meeting with some prominent 9/11 truth and justice activists. Stay tuned (:
Related Links:
- Janey Coverdale speaks out on the Oklahoma City bombing - Part 1
- Free Mind Report – Guest Hereward Fenton
- Hereward Fenton on Live and Let Live (Rule of Law Radio)
Hereward Fenton on Live and Let Live (Rule of Law Radio)
Live and Let Live, with Gary Johnson (Sundays 8-10 pm CST).
Robert Guest, (http://www.robertguest.com/, http://www.dallascriminaldefenselawyerblog.com/) president of the Kaufman County, Texas, Bar Association, promotes Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, LEAP, (http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php) and explains how to use the Open Records Act.
Hereward Fenton, host of “Truth News Australia,” (http://www.truthnews.com.au/) analyzes the 2002 Bali Bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing, and 9-11. (http://www.911oz.com/)
Free Mind Report – Guest Hereward Fenton
![]()
This week our guest was Hereward Fenton http://www.truthnews.com.au
Hereward Fenton is a 9/11 researcher and host of Truth News Australia.
As a leader in the Australian Truth movement his passion for Truth has led him down some deep rabbit holes. Listen live Wednesday January 5, 2011 from 8PM to 10PM CT.
http://ruleoflawradio.com/archive/?p=4037
Janey Coverdale speaks out on the Oklahoma City bombing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpvX6zdNkLY
On 8 January 2011 Hereward Fenton interviewed Janey Coverdale, grandmother and legal guardian of two children, Aaron and Elijah who perished in the bomb attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995.
Janey vehemently disagrees with the government version of what happened and is still seeking justice and closure. She has vowed not to stop in her quest for the truth as long as she breathes.
In this interview Janey shares some of the insights she has gained in the case over the past decade and a half.
Huge thanks to Chris Emery for making this interview possible.
Welcome to 2011: Year of Austerity, Rebellion and Liberation
Truth News is proud to announce we have launched a new website and we will soon launch a live show via the US.
Tonight's show is short and sweet. I'm joined by Josh Jackson for a discussion about the proposed GST for online shopping, and a look at the major trends for 2011.
Thanks for your support of TNRA - it means alot to us - and please get in touch if you would like to contribute material to our news section.
All the best for 2011!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJnu4p_1bzI
Related Links:
David Chandler weighs in on 9/11 Pentagon questions
David Chandler is well known to the 9/11 truth movement for his meticulous research. In the following article he speaks out on the questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon which have been the subject of bitter disputes among 9/11 researchers.
Overwhelming Evidence of Insider Complicity
If you watch our videos and read the links on this site you will understand why we assert that the weight of the evidence points to the fact that 9/11 was orchestrated by insiders…
- with access to high tech military-grade nano-energetic materials (aka nano-thermite)
- with access to the infrastructure of some of the most highly secure buildings in New York over an extended period of time
- with the expertise to accomplish the most difficult demolitions in history
- with the ability to manage public perception of the event despite numerous contrary contemporaneous eyewitness reports
- with the ability to coordinate the take-downs of the twin towers with the airplane flights
- with the ability to coordinate with the military to not intercept the airplane flights
- with the ability to stage a highly coordinated cover-up, starting on the day of 9/11 itself
- with the ability to prevent ANY investigation for many months
- with the ability to stage-manage fraudulent investigations once the demand grew too loud (the 9/11 Commission report the NIST reports)
All of this evidence comes from the investigation of the World Trade Center, based on public evidence and the laws of physics. The evidence is overwhelming, consistent, persuasive, and broadly agreed upon by the “scientific wing” of the 9/11 Truth Movement. The concrete physical and video evidence leading to these conclusions narrows the field of possible perpetrators significantly.
Welcome to Truth News 2.0!
Truth News Australia 2.0 is here!
An improved user experience and richer content awaits you! We now have a dedicated news section and we are inviting you the reader to contribute. Currently the news content is sparse but we aim to load up the news section with content very soon.
Happy New Year & welcome to the new website. Please leave a comment and let us know what you think.
The Truth News Team.


Recent Comments
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.
What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?
Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?
By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?
By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.
So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.
1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?
2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?
3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?
If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.
Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.
By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh Anonymous,
You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.