Truth News Australia

LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!

Julian Assange in the crosshairs

This text will be replaced
Broadcast of August 16, 2012. Part 1 of 2 » Download mp3: click here
This text will be replaced
Broadcast of August 16, 2012. Part 2 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

19 August 2012 | Permalink | comments: 4
By Hereward Fenton

Share |
Categories: [ Black Salve, Iran, Julian Assange ]

Julian Assange supporters

Today's show focuses on the stand-off between Julian Assange and the British government. The news about his acceptance by Ecuador had not yet broken as we went to air.

We also take a look at the science-fiction level totalitarian surveillance system known as "TrapWire", amid speculation that this invasive technique of "crime prevention" may be already in use in Australia. We note that all copies of an article on the topic (originally published in the Fairfax press) have now abeen deleted. The original article can still be found here, courtesy of Fair Dinkum Radio.

Other themes addressed in the show include the escalating rhetoric of war against Iran, the Australian nanny state, and a look at the a testimonial regarding the alternative cancer cure known as "black salve".

Related Links

Free speech in Australia under threat

This text will be replaced
Broadcast of July 12, 2012. Part 1 of 2 » Download mp3: click here
This text will be replaced
Broadcast of July 12, 2012. Part 2 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

15 July 2012 | Permalink | comments: 1
By Hereward Fenton

Share |
Categories: [ Black Salve, Vaccination ]

DISCLAIMER: This article is NOT an advertisement for "black salve", nor should it be construed as promoting the use of "black salve".

We tend to believe that in Australia, despite excessive taxation, nanny state legislation, over-regulation and a spiralling cost of living, we at least have free speech, right?

At least we are not like China where the government has a list of banned topics that cannot be discussed publicly, right?

Wrong!

Our government, via a maze of bureaucracies, can and does prohibit discussion, even in a purely journalistic way, about alternative health products and therapies which are not "approved" by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). TGA (the equivalent of the FDA in the US) has wide ranging powers to prevent the sale, advertising and apparently even the discussion of non-approved health products, one of which is the purported cancer cure known as "black salve".

My guest today in the 2nd hour is Leon Pittard, host of Fair Dinkum Radio, who has been served with a complaint from the TGA due to an interview he conducted with Meryl Dorey, Director of the Australian Vaccination Network (AVN), a non-profit organisation which helps people make informed decisions about vaccines.

The AVN has been targeted for several years by pro-vaccine lobbyists whose website, "Stop the AVN", declares that "the anti-vaccination propaganda issued by the AVN and its President, Meryl Dorey, is a menace to public health". This group has been behind complaints against the AVN which were upheld by another government organisation, the "Health Care Complaints Commission" (HCCC).

More recently, the AVN was ordered to stop selling a DVD titled One Answer to Cancer, which promotes the use of a herbal remedy known as "black salve". Despite complying with the demand to remove the DVD from sale on their website, the AVN and Leon Pittard are now being harassed simply for talking about the subject during an interview on Fair Dinkum Radio on on 5 May 2012.

Leon Pittard has documented the entire saga in his article and press release, "Australian thought police target free speech".

Next week we will be interviewing Meryl Dorey to get her perspective on this deeply troubling chain of events.

VIDEO ON BLACK SALVE FROM PANACEA BOCAF

Related Links

You are currently visiting as a guest, to login or register please click here.


RSS feed icon

Recent Comments

Leonard Clampett,

the title of the “chemistry 131” textbook is a pun on the title of the Air Cadet’s handbook called “Contrails”, which everyone of them gets since the 1950ies:

http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/108977-my-small-collection-of-air-force-academy-insignia/

The textbook is about science. There is no connection to what you are calling “chemtrails”. Read it for yourself:

http://metabunk.org/files/chemtrails-chemistry-manual-usaf-academy-1999.pdf

I strongly suggest you have a look on page 22 and following, where you will find a good wrap-up about how to confirm a theory according to the scientific method. Apply that to your theory of chemtrails.

What is your scientific evidence?

By Josh on 2013 06 16 - 17:17:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

For all the naysayers and deniers of chemtrails, here is a link to show that the word “chemtrails” was not coined by members of the general public but the the US Air Force as shown in their pilot training manual shown here in that manual published in 1990.

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/chemtrails/us-air-force-academy-chemtrail-manual.html

Maybe we can now get on with the task of stopping the chemtrails.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 06 16 - 14:48:59
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 10:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 09:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Hereward Fenton
Hereward Fenton

Categories