LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!
Most Popular
Latest Posts
The new stolen generation
Australia is experiencing an epidemic of child abduction - but this is not the work of your average criminals. These crimes are being committed by the State, using words like "care" and "protection" as a justification. TNRA intends to run a series of interviews with victims of this criminal racket, and today we bring you the first installment.
Today we speak with Toni Clancy, whose son Zac was snatched from day care by the Department of Community Services (DOCS) last March. Since then there has been no court hearing. While accusations have been laid by the DOCS case workers, there has been no legal process.
Toni believes one of the reasons why her son was taken is that she declined to take a course of anti-depressants.
Toni's mother Linda has provided the following additional information:
Also in the show today we cover the latest developments in eco-fascism, with a discussion of a shocking video released by the environmental organisation 10:10. The video depicts children being gruesomely murdered for refusing to participate in carbon reduction measures. Although this is superficially presented as comedy, there clearly is a dark threat here, and one which should not be taken lightly.
The video has now been removed from the 10:10 website, but multiple copies remain on the internet.
WARNING: This video is extremely disturbing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nws7cM_QrOY
We also bring you the latest Nanny State developments, with the Gillard government threatening to fingerprint and electronically track all pokie players in a misguided attempt to curb problem gambling.
Thanks for listening!
Related Links
Today we speak with Toni Clancy, whose son Zac was snatched from day care by the Department of Community Services (DOCS) last March. Since then there has been no court hearing. While accusations have been laid by the DOCS case workers, there has been no legal process.
Toni believes one of the reasons why her son was taken is that she declined to take a course of anti-depressants.
Toni's mother Linda has provided the following additional information:
The psychologist DoCS sent my daughter to put my her through assessment for anger management, borderline personality disorder and drug and alcohol dependency. Those three assessments came back that my daughter does not have an issue with any of them.
The drug and alcohol counsellor that Toni is attending at DoCS insistence claims that Toni does not have a drug or alcohol addiction, yet only two weeks ago I was told that Toni has difficulties with drugs and alcohol, which is one reason why they will not look at restoring Zac to his mother.
A mental health assessment done by our local mental health team stated that the only problem Toni has at the moment is that her son has been taken from her and the emotions she is feeling are appropriate to the situation.
Toni is attending regular sessions with a counsellor who also backs Toni in her attempts to get her son back.
Also in the show today we cover the latest developments in eco-fascism, with a discussion of a shocking video released by the environmental organisation 10:10. The video depicts children being gruesomely murdered for refusing to participate in carbon reduction measures. Although this is superficially presented as comedy, there clearly is a dark threat here, and one which should not be taken lightly.
The video has now been removed from the 10:10 website, but multiple copies remain on the internet.
WARNING: This video is extremely disturbing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nws7cM_QrOY
We also bring you the latest Nanny State developments, with the Gillard government threatening to fingerprint and electronically track all pokie players in a misguided attempt to curb problem gambling.
Thanks for listening!
Related Links
Recent Comments
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.
What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?
Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?
By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?
By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.
So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.
1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?
2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?
3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?
If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.
Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.
By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh Anonymous,
You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.