LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!
Most Popular
Latest Posts
Freedom Alliance: How We Will Save Australia
Categories: [ Freedom Alliance ]
We begin tonight's show as usual with a round-up of the latest news from our twitter department - see links below.
At around the 30min mark we bring you a special presentation.
As the walls close in around us in this failed democracy we are witnessing a new type of political awareness which is spawning a myriad of groups whose common theme is upholding freedom against encroaching corporatist/globalist tyranny, and restoring universal principles of human rights to public discourse and policy making.
Tonight we welcome the leaders of 3 such political movements in Australia who are uniting under the banner of freedom.
Our guests tonight are:
Our discussion ranges through specific policy areas of each of these parties to the universal and unifying principles which would be central to the new alliance which is still in the early stages of formation. We engage with some difficult questions in relation to a bill of rights and the core definition of democracy. We also look at whether it is possible for a democracy to serve the minority as well as the majority.
I found this discussion to be highly stimulating and I'm sure you'll feel the same way. Please enjoy, and forward to your networks.
Note: It was indicated to me after the show that the plan to change the name of the Climate Sceptics party is still tentative at this time.
Related links
At around the 30min mark we bring you a special presentation.
As the walls close in around us in this failed democracy we are witnessing a new type of political awareness which is spawning a myriad of groups whose common theme is upholding freedom against encroaching corporatist/globalist tyranny, and restoring universal principles of human rights to public discourse and policy making.
Tonight we welcome the leaders of 3 such political movements in Australia who are uniting under the banner of freedom.
Our guests tonight are:
- Daniel Huppert, spokesperson for the Australian Sovereignty Party
- Paul Kuhn, spokesperson of the F.R.E.E Australian Party
- Leon Ashby, president of the Climate Sceptics Party
Our discussion ranges through specific policy areas of each of these parties to the universal and unifying principles which would be central to the new alliance which is still in the early stages of formation. We engage with some difficult questions in relation to a bill of rights and the core definition of democracy. We also look at whether it is possible for a democracy to serve the minority as well as the majority.
I found this discussion to be highly stimulating and I'm sure you'll feel the same way. Please enjoy, and forward to your networks.
Note: It was indicated to me after the show that the plan to change the name of the Climate Sceptics party is still tentative at this time.
Related links
- Freedom Alliance How we will save Australia (PDF)
- WTC 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions
- Body scanners will not be used at Dubai airports
- Just how safe are Tasers in the hands of our police? Dylan Welch investigates
- Taser abuse covered up by police
- New study finds gut bacteria may contribute to autism
- Net filter trials 'unlawful', claims engineer
- Petrol and power prices rise sharply as New Zealand passes emissions trading scheme
Recent Comments
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.
What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?
Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?
By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?
By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.
So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.
1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?
2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?
3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?
If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.
Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.
By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh Anonymous,
You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.