Truth News Australia

LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!

Mega corporations merge with the feudal super-state

This text will be replaced
Broadcast of September 22, 2010. Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

23 September 2010 | Permalink | comments: 5

Tonight we bring you an alarming story from the UK, where a government policy paper has been released, proposing that Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) effectively would become the paymaster for the entire nation, with wage payments mandated to go to the HMRC first, and then after deductions, into the employee's bank account.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcgJnL6s2JY

This plan, which of course is nothing less than a brutal power grab by a malevolent clique of corporatist tyrants, may not go ahead, but the mere fact that it has been floated without causing an uproar in parliament or the media must be a cause of great concern to all who respect the basic sovereign rights of the individual which have been enshrined in law since the Magna Carta.

Indeed this policy, if enacted, would return the British people to feudal servitude, with all citizens becoming essentially vassals of a mega-corporation/super-state which would then be able to control the most basic aspect of their lives, namely the simple ability to pay for food and shelter.

In other news tonight we look at the latest vaccine controversies, with a new report showing that young children were more likely to end up in hospital because of side-effects from a leading flu vaccine than they were from the illness itself. We also look at the case of Hannah Poling, who regressed developmentally after being given nine vaccines in one day, aged just 18 months. The family has been awarded $1.5 million by the Federal Vaccine Court, but in a shocking development, the case has been sealed, preventing future litigants from gaining access to the evidence or arguments in the case.

Finally we look at the heart-breaking story of Matt and Janet Thompson, whose cattle feedlot business was forced to shut down after a three year battle with the government over greenhouse gas abatement rulings which they characterise as "evironmental extremism".  The punitive actions of government bureucrats in this case led to the suicide of their farm manager and bankruptcy for the family. If you would like to help Matt and Janet, you can find more information here.

Thanks for listening!

Related Links

You are currently visiting as a guest, to login or register please click here.


RSS feed icon

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.


1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?


If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Hereward Fenton
Hereward Fenton

Categories