LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!
Most Popular
Latest Posts
In which everyone becomes a (16 digit) number
In the classic TV sci-fi black comedy The Prisoner Patrick McGoohan (pictured above) is trapped in a fake village whose residents are identified by numbers. Mysteriously, everyone in the village pretends to be free, whereas in fact they are all prisoners with virtually no autonomy at all.
Does this remind you of anything?
Tonight we catch up on some of the latest milestones in the ongoing state run program to strip citizens of their rights, reduce their identities to numbers, track, trace and spy on their every movement.
As reported in the Australian on 15 Jan:
Last August, former human services minister Chris Ellison overturned a ban on the use of Medicare data for other purposes through a controversial legislative amendment.
The overturning of this fundamental protection of privacy has now opened the way for all Australians' medical histories to be data mined and tracked by the corporate bureaucracy better known as "government". This change has taken place with no public debate, and the new medicare smart cards are described as "compulsory".
We also take a look at the latest news in the climate debate, with the jaw-dropping admission to the BBC last week that Phil Jones, Director of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit, that "from1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming".
In the second half we are joined by Jack Frost, co-host of the Radio Skid Row breakfast show, to discuss various issues of the day.
Related Links
- As of July, every Australian will be assigned a compulsory 16 digit number known as a healthcare identifier
- Ex-florist "cheats" via Google maps now has to do Community service
- Greece loses EU voting power in blow to sovereignty
- Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Announce Sydney Press Conference
- Auschwitz survivor Dr. Hajo Meyer talks about differences between the Nazi's treatment of Jews and the Palestinians today
- "Temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change" - Prof. John Christy, lead author 2001 IPCC report
- Prof. Phil Jones admits to BBC: "from1995 to the present there has been NO statistically-significant global warming"
Recent Comments
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.
What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?
Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?
By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?
By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.
So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.
1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?
2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?
3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?
If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.
Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.
By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh Anonymous,
You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.