Truth News Australia

LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!

Psychiatrists gone wild: ‘psychosis risk syndrome’

This text will be replaced
Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

22 July 2010 | Permalink | comments: 12

Child receiving pillsTonight's show features two excellent interviews.

In the first half I am joined by Kim Cullen from the Citizens Committee on Human Rights to discuss the implications of 'Australian of the Year', Patrick McGorry's plan for pre-drugging children with powerful psychotropic medication as a preventive treatment against mental illness.

Our discussion centers on a recent article authored by Jan Eastgate which gives insight into the impact of these policies in Australia.

As indicated in the following article from Psychology Today, this new medical label could lead to a staggering 90%  misdiagnosis rate:
Even in the most expert of hands (ie in very highly selected research clinics), at least two of three people who get the diagnosis do not go on to become psychotic. Of great counterintuitive interest, the longer the research clinic operates the lower becomes its rate of correct identification. With time and spreading reputation, the clinic attracts increasingly heterogeneous referrals- so that it is more difficult to discriminate from among them those who are truly at risk for psychosis.

What would be the misidentification rate once the diagnosis became official and was applied in the real world? No one can say for sure, but two thirds is certainly a lower limit of misidentification. There are several reasons to believe that the ratio of wrong diagnoses would actually be much higher: 1)the raters in general practice would be much less expert than specialists in research clinics; 2) the "patients" would be closer to normal and harder to discriminate; and, 3)drug company marketing would influence parents and clinicians to be especially alert to any strangeness in teenagers. It has been estimated that the false positive rate would jump from about 70 percent in specialty clinics to about 90 percent in general practice. This means that as many as an astounding nine in ten individuals identified as "risk syndrome" would not really be at risk for developing psychosis.
- Psychology Today | 18 March 2010

In the second half of the show I am joined by Apollo sceptic and film maker Jarrah White.

Jarrah has made numerous short documentaries which are all posted on youtube. Jarrah claims that the Apollo Moon missions were faked, and he has compiled an impressive amount of evidence to this effect.

I leave final judgment on this topic to the discretion of our listeners!

Tonight's show was highly enjoyable and I'm sure you'll find it worthwhile listening.

Related Links:

The Copenhagen Plot

This text will be replaced
Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

03 November 2009 | Permalink | comments: 19

Is the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference a front for the next phase of world domination by a supra-national elite of bankers and their political lap-dogs? Is Copenhagen launch pad for a World Government which will extort money from the entire human race in the form of "carbon taxes"? These concerns are addressed in tonight's edition of TNRA.

Also in tonight's show, we look at the mounting evidence that the Federal Labor and Liberal parties are merely branches of the same organisation.

In the second half we bring you a review of Alex Jones' latest production - "Fall of the Republic", and we look at the disturbing prediction by U.S. Senator Ron Paul that the current economic "green shoots" will soon give way to a much deeper and darker recession, mirroring the pattern of the Great Depression.

A great show!

More Links:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddQvhdCyhe4

The fluoride question

This text will be replaced
Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

10 September 2009 | Permalink | comments: 14

Share |
Categories: [ Eugenics, Fluoride, Mass Medication ]
Should fluoride be added to drinking water?

Tonight it is my pleasure to have Ged Johnson, creator and webmaster of Fluoride Australia, on the show.

Is fluoridation of the water supply a form of mass-medication? If so, what are the possible dangers and side effects, and is it subject standard regulatory controls? Above all, why has there never been a public debate, and does the government have the right to forcibly medicate the population?

These are some of the questions we address in this show.

Professional Perspectives on Water Fluoridation (documentary)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7547385139152764985

Fluoride links:

More links for tonight's show:


RSS feed icon

Hereward Fenton
Hereward Fenton

Categories