LISTEN LIVE OR CALL IN » CLICK HERE!
Most Popular
Lies and cover-ups by the Australian national broadcaster exposed by Chris Graham
Today, in the second hour, we welcome journalist Chris Graham to the show. Chris is the founding editor of the National Indigenous Times and the recipient of the prestigious Walkley Award for Excellence in Indigenous Affairs reporting.
In the course of our interview Chris documents a range of unethical and downright deceitful practices engaged by ABC Lateline in their coverage of a scandal which indirectly led to the highy controversial and despised NT Intervention.
The "intervention" as it's now simply called, was a combination of draconian changes to the law and unprecendented law enforcement measures enacted in 2007, including roll back of the Native Title Act, quarantining of welfare benefits and deployment of 600 soldiers from the Australian Defence Forces in remote communites in the Northern Territories. The measures were spurred by claims of rampant sexual abuse in remote Aboriginal communities which had first appeared on ABC television's Lateline program in 2006.
During tonight's interview Chris steps us through his research which shows conclusively that senior ABC producers engaged in distortion of facts, wanton fabrication of evidence, and used testimony of informants who were clearly lying.
Such practices are of course all too common at the ABC, as regular listeners to this show will know. As with the biased reporting and cheap attacks on the character of Schapelle Corby's family, the one-sided coverage of the Syrian conflict or the suppression of critical evidence concerning the 9/11 terrorist attacks, this shocking story adds weight to the case for radically overhauling or even dismantling the ABC which has flagrantly breached its charter so many times.
In the first hour of today's show we give you a different perspective on the question of accesibility of assault weapons in the US in the wake of Alex Jones' highly controversial appearance on CNN with Piers Morgan.
I hope you enjoy the show!
Related Links
John Bursill on 9/11 truth, racism and politics
As well as being a passionate 9/11 truther and peace activist John also has a strong interest in indigenous issues and human rights abuses in Australia. Tonight he brings us the shocking story of a racially motivated killing which took place in the Northern Territory in 2009 - a story which has had little exposure in the media but clearly reveals the dark underbelly of racism in this country.
Kwementyaye Ryder, a 33 year-old Aboriginal man, was bashed to death by five young, local, white men as he walked home in the early morning hours of July 25 2009. The initial charges of murder were reduced to manslaughter and Chief Justice Martin, who had earlier criticised Aboriginal culture for not respecting the justice system, delivered sentences ranging from just twelve months to four years.
During the show we bring you, as usual, a variety of breaking news stories.
We cover in detail the bombshell story of an FBI whistle blower who has revealed new evidence about the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963. The Kennedy assassination remains one of the most important unsolved crimes of the modern age, and the events provide a very interesting parallel with 9/11 in terms of the way an inside job was pulled off and then covered up through collusion between government and corporate media. The cover up was achieved largely by the framing of a patsy (Lee Harvey Oswald) which deflected attention away from a proper forensic investigation and provided the uncomprehending public with a convenient villain upon which to focus their rage and need for retribution.
The new evidence brought forward by retired FBI agent Don Adams adds to a mountain of evidence which conflicts with the official findings of the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone in killing Kennedy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wktzy-8BV8
During the show we also announce a 9/11 truth protest which will be held outside the War Memorial in Sydney's Hyde Park on 11 September 2010 - all welcome.
Related Links
- US recession deepens as home sales fall, foreclosures rise
- Steve Jobs Is Watching You: Apple Seeking to Patent Spyware
- JFK Bombshell: Retired FBI Agent Says Oswald Didn't Kill Kennedy
- Public Protest: 9/11 Truth for Peace
- Stop the Intervention Collective Sydney - an open collective of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people committed to the repeal of the NT Intervention
- "Racism in the media: The lie that built a Northern Territory Intervention" - a speech by investigative journalist Chris Graham (video)
- THE BIG READ: Deep South justice in the Red Centre
- NEW Prof. Jones Presentation "9/11: Science and Society" Filmed in Sydney, Australia
- 9/11 Truth for Peace? Sydney's Sept 11 Anniversary Protest Calls for End of Afghan War!
Recent Comments
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.
What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?
Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?
By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?
By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Leonard Clampett,
after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.
So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.
1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?
2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?
3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?
If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.
Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.
By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.
Josh Anonymous,
You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.
By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.