Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

911: The side they’ll never print

26 May 2011 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Amina Youssef | 18 March 2011

http://amaarantine.tumblr.com/post/3920160056/911-the-side-theyll-never-print

The events of September 11, 2011 were a catastrophe that shook the global population by its roots. An inhumane act largely unprecedented in the modern world was unleashed onto society causing a wave of fear and ‘terror’ that would significantly effect the years to come. Islamaphobia increased, racial hate became more prevalent, and the world turned a blind eye to the incoming or rather, ongoing suffering of Arabs and Afghans in the occupied regions of the Middle East. This is not to suggest that thoughts which did not exist were aroused on that day. Undoubtedly there was a seed, a fear of the unknown, that lay dormant and was awoken through nourishment provided by western propaganda. 

Prejudice and racial discrimination against Muslims was solidified due to the blame that was placed on an isolated minority of “Radical and fundamentalist Muslims”. ‘Terrorists’, a picture of the fallen towers, and the word ‘Muslim’ occupied every front paper on the Globe. Since it was they themselves who claimed to be brothers and sisters regardless of blood lines, it could only be said then that all were either directly or indirectly a terrorist by association.  This ‘Terrorist’ label was applied on Muslims before any tangible proof or thorough investigation could be undertaken. This became a significant problem especially since the American Government to the current day fails to outline any transparency of processes or tangible information to affirm that it was ‘Allah’s advocates’ who undertook this act of inhumanity. 

This is not to suggest that I am not in sympathy with those who suffered on that frightful day. On the contrary, I write this in order to allow victims of September 11 to have the rightful perpetrators of extreme violence to be put to trial so that it may possible to retain any justice left in the world. Any of you who have watched raw videos or heard audio recordings of the day can agree with me that the event was a tragedy. For those of you who do not agree, then perhaps you are on the wrong page. 

We all listened to the desperate voices calling out through telephone lines for someone to save them. We all witnessed the tears falling of those who were forced to recount the last words of their trapped loved ones. We all heard of the people who leaped from windows out of sheer desperation to be liberated from the internal and physical battle of slowly oncoming death. No human should be trapped in such a way that forces one to die a thousand times before the end finally comes. 

Undoubtedly, the people who planned and carried out the lethal acts were terrorists of the worst kind. Their emotional indifference to their human counter parts and the suffering that it would cause really strikes hard at the reasonable mind. This attack was not only one on people on that day and in that building. Their hijacking of the buildings tore through the human psyche of the Western population. It ravaged through centuries of peaceful streets and buildings that Islam had built through it’s beauty and tolerance. It tore apart hearts everywhere and hardened them creating a barrier between Islam and the non Muslim entities of the world.

George Bush accompanied by Western Media declared that the attacks were planned and executed by non other than the American trained Muslim terrorist Osama Bin Laden and his followers.

I was 11 years old at the time when the twin towers hit the buildings. I was ready to accept that Osama Bin Laden had convinced his little radical sheep to hijack planes in order to kill Non-Muslims (and Muslims alike). But I am no longer young, naiive and stupid. 

The evidence presented to us now conflicts with what Americans declared happened on that day. For example, 911truth.org is a group of officials such as Architects, lawyers, firefighters etc who came together demanding truth and transparency regarding the terrible events that left thousands of people dead. They have publicly spoken about the fallacies of what the Government dignitaries have supported. How is it that the tower fell down in such perfect vertical alignment? Why was there a series of explosions going off in the various levels of the building BELOW where the plane hit? How did the vehicles containing the explosives even get in through WTC security? And most importantly how did the passport of the supposed ‘Muslim’ hijacker be discovered in the debris and rubble during the aftermath yet the black boxes which are meant to be virtually indestructible be gone beyond repair? What lunacy! If you are ready to believe that a passport survived from the top of a high rise burning building to the bottom then I suggest to you that you are of poor mind. 

Whoever orchestrated these attacks needs to be brought to justice. The effects of the terrorist attacks on September 11 did not end on that day. These criminals have caused over one Million deaths of Iraqis, Afghanis, and foreign soldiers including Americans and Australians in the Middle East due to Bush’s atrocious and ill made “War on Terror”. 

They have created a rift between Muslims and Non-Muslims, and stamped an irreversible scar on the families of the 911 victims. Non-Muslim psyche’s were hit and charged with fury and hate. How very convenient since now most of the Western World feels a great sense of indifference to the suffering, pain and increasing death of Muslims in the Middle East by unwelcome occupiers and terrorists such as Israel. 

If this veil that has blinded them after 911 which Western Media was the direct instigator of could be removed they would be able to see the atrocities and war crimes that Israel incites on the West Bank and East Jerusalem on a daily basis. They would no longer see the death of the Arab and Afghan children in the middle east as collateral damage. 

Let the truth be exposed so that the world can work together to allow the future to be decorated with light and togetherness. Peace and tolerance can be promoted through the existence of truth and criminal accountability that can be placed on an individual regardless of race, colour or religion. 

This cannot happen as long as ignorance remains like a malignant tumor within mankind.

Don’t be dumb. The more you believe Western Propaganda the more you become a victim of mass hypnosis of an otherwise passive world community. Make your own decision, but don’t be blinded by patriotism in such a way that you cannot see the truth… and even if you don’t want to accept the truth, don’t be stupid enough to remain convinced by lies.

Comments

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

Listen Live

Recent Comments

Andrew Adams,

you have argued that there would always be natural clouds present if conditions were right for persistent contrails.

In my reply I quoted an atmospheric scientist who spends his life with researching contrails. He says that persistent contrails can form in levels of ice supersaturation that are not yet high enough for natural cirrus formation.

Do you think he is wrong?

By Josh on 2014 11 01 - 18:54:22
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Wayne Hall,

what is your evidence for the aerosol spraying that you are referring to?

By Josh on 2014 11 01 - 18:39:28
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

There is no reason on earth why one should keep on talking about contrails vs chemtails just because those who launched this aerosol spraying decades ago thought that it would be nice to have the contrails cover story. The starting point for discussion is the claims by geoengineering advocates (such as Clive Hamilton in Australia) that solar radiation management would be a good idea and that aerosol spraying for geoengineering or other undisclosed purposes is not already a global reality. And the onus of proof is on them, i.e. those that are making this claim.

By Wayne Hall on 2014 11 01 - 16:42:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

josh dumdum,
you still seem incapable of comprehending the simple fact that i consider engaging seriously with you a complete waste of time..

your only qualification from the school of sophistry does not qualify you to pretend you are some sort of expert on anything, and again, nothing you say is of any interest to me. you have failed time and time again to prove people should not be concerned.

i dont need you to tell me anything, nor does anyone else. there are plenty of qualified experts who are not afraid to put their names to their claims who id trust way before someone who spends an inordinate amount of time on nondescript websites trying to “debunk” the truth…

that is the lie.

 

 

By Andrew Adams on 2014 11 01 - 10:20:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Andrew Adams,

you say “if that were the case.. there would be other clouds present”.

And there often are other cirrus clouds around when contrails persist for long! In clear blue skies, contrails are quite often not persisting. Both does not always apply though; see quote further below which has the reason for that.

The process I described is how persistent contrails form; it’s not just a claim I make. Read NASA’s contrail pages for a starter. It has to say:

Persistent contrails are ice clouds, so they are mostly made of ice. They also are likely to contain aircraft exhaust products (including soot and dissolved gases like sulfur dioxide), but they are overwhelmingly made from moisture condensed out of the surrounding air.” (Emphasis is mine)

Or read Ulrich Schumann’s concise 2005 paper on contrails, which contains this sentence:

Contrails evaporate quickly if the ambient air is dry; they persist, evolve into more extended cirrus clouds and grow in particle size by deposition of ambient water vapour on the ice particles in the contrails if the ambient air is humid enough.” (Emphasis is mine)

In the conclusion of the paper, you’ll find a hint why it’s quite possible that there may be persistent contrails without surrounding clouds:

Many aspects of contrail formation are well understood. Contrails from for thermodynamic reasons when the ambient air is cold enough. Persistent contrails form in ice-supersaturated air masses. In such cases often contrail cirrus forms where no cirrus would form otherwise because ice supersaturation is often too low for natural cirrus particle nucleation.” (Emphasis is mine)

Now can you tell me where you think there is a lie?

By Josh on 2014 11 01 - 09:25:53
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

“If a contrail persists and grows, the additional mass comes from the humidity that is already present in the air - just like when natural clouds form, seemingly out of nothing.”

if that were the case.. there would be other clouds present, ones that have not come out the back of an aircraft. if the humidity is there, you wouldnt need an aircraft going past in order for clouds to appear in an otherwise perfectly clear blue sky.

appareently fenton likes truth here, yet not only does he tolerate your lies, he encourages it.

not the first sign of hypocristy we see from him though. still cant tear himself away from facebook i see )

By Andrew Adams on 2014 11 01 - 08:34:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Burden of proof. Clever legal chess play.
Isn’t it the case that those that rule us do so in deference to our sovereignty.
Isn’t it the case that .many of us do not consent to the above mentioned rulership.
Isn’t it the case that if one were to ask one of the said rulers to write down and sign at their own individual unlimited commercial liability that geoengineering, including but not limited to “chemtrails”, for the purpose of weather manipulation is not being conducted that there would be a refusal.
Is it not the case that a refusal to the previous proposition would amount to tacit agreement that what is referred to is happening.
The burden of proof rests on him who affirms not on him who denies….but there are ways snaring the slippery.

By Cris on 2014 11 01 - 08:26:55
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

““i have been neither dictatorial, nor abusive” - yes, you have mate. Earlier you said “how about just taking a big gulp from the mug of STFU”. That is both dictatorial and abusive. We’ll now add “dishonest” to the list of your shortcomings. Have a nice day.”

i think you need to look up the definition of dictatorial fenton. banning people here simply because you can would more fit the definition than me suggesting someone take a drink from a mug.

as far as honesty goes, i really doubt you have a leg to stand on there, because if i were to believe you really want me to “have a nice day” instead of it being a smarmy glib sarcastic jibe, then id be as gormless as josh, who still cant seem to understand the fact that nothing he can say here, in his role as unqualified mendacious shill, is of any interest to me.

further on honesty, you say “i think we can all agree that a plane hit the pentagoin” - not verbatim, but its close - so perhaps you can show us what you base that falsehood on?

further on honesty you continue to pretend chemtrails are a non issue, disregarding the concerns of thousands more qualified than you.

further on henesty, you call this site truthnews…

have a shitty day <—- at least im honest

By Andrew Adams on 2014 11 01 - 08:26:21
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Cris,

the point that rational people make is that the stuff coming from the airplane exhaust stays indeed the same, but what’s changing is the situation around the plane. At one day there is dry air, at annother there is a lot of humidity. (See my explanation how the latter can happen when a front is approaching.)

If a contrail persists and grows, the additional mass comes from the humidity that is already present in the air - just like when natural clouds form, seemingly out of nothing.

By the way, that is a well-known plausibility argument against chemtrails - no plane is able to carry the mass equivalent of even a small persistant trail (search “ice budget”).

By Josh on 2014 10 31 - 23:46:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Andrew Adams,

I don’t claim to be an expert. However, I have read a lot about both chemtrail claims and their dissection from a scientic point of view, from sources that are accessible to everyone.

If something specific that I wrote is wrong, I certainly welcome a correction. Usually, I’m giving references from actual experts, so it’s only fair that any rebuttal should include specific references too. Also, I’d welcome if we could stay polite.

The science of persistent contrails is well established. They were observed since the early days of aviation (see also the top article), and the conditions that favour them were researched in the middle of the 20th century (Schmidt and Appleman, see for instance the introduction of this paper).

The Appleman Chart is a rule of thumb for contrail prediction. It is not very intuitive, but there is a visualization available which allows to adjust the parameters and see how the contrail properties are changing (needs Java).

Any claim that a specific persistent contrail cannot be explained with this knowledge needs to be based on very good evidence. If the evidence is reviewed and still stands, science has to be corrected. That’s the whole idea about scientific research - but the burden of proof lies with the person who makes the claim.

By Josh on 2014 10 31 - 22:38:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Categories