Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

Complete Withdrawal of Support by Richard Gage, AIA, for CIT’s “National Security Alert”

10 February 2011 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=1905

Richard Gage | 8 Feb 2011

I am hereby now on the record clearly as NOT supporting the CIT investigation at all.  In addition, I insist that CIT delete my name from its web site in any and every context in which it might give the impression of support or endorsement of their efforts from me.

In early 2009, I watched the “National Security Alert” video by the Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) where recollections of 10 eyewitness accounts of the attack on the Pentagon were presented (of many more that were interviewed).  These accounts included the witnesses’ recollection of the path being taken by the plane prior to impact. The path that many of them recalled was to the north of the former CITGO gas station.  Based on these few accounts CIT presented its case that the plane flew over the Pentagon since the damage trail was not consistent with the north path.

My main focus relative to 9/11 had been on the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers.  I had not been able to spend much time on the Pentagon issue.  I was initially impressed by CIT’s presentation and, more than a year and a half ago, provided a short statement of support for their efforts.

After making my statement I became aware of more details of the CIT witness accounts as well as the rest of the compelling eyewitness testimony that is available. The vast majority of eyewitness accounts refute the CIT flyover conclusion, as they entail that the plane hit the Pentagon or was flying so low it could not miss.
I was also surprised to learn that 12 of the witnesses that CIT interviewed (including six witnesses to whom CIT refers to as north path witnesses) were in a position to see the Pentagon and all 12 stated that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon.  It was clear from this that CIT used improper investigative methods. CIT used and presented only those portions of their witness reports which fit their conclusion. The preponderance of  CIT’s own evidence in fact supports the conclusion that the plane impacted the Pentagon. (See Summary and Analysis of “National Security Alert” and other works listed below for these and many additional witness statements that describe the plane as clearly impacting the Pentagon).

Because of these concerns I provided new statements in December 2009 and January 2010 pointing out that my previous statement of support should not be interpreted as an endorsement of their conclusion that the airplane flew over the Pentagon.  Despite these statements, CIT has continued to publish my original statement and characterize it as an endorsement of their flyover conclusion.  I am hereby now on the record clearly as NOT supporting the CIT investigation at all.  In addition, I insist that CIT delete my name from its web site in any and every context in which it might give the impression of support or endorsement of their efforts from me.

I base my present position also on a number of blogs, papers, blogs, and videos that have shed light on the Pentagon Flight 77 issues and on CIT’s work. These papers should be among those studied by anyone seeking the full truth about these matters.  Most of these works analyze additional evidence and come to different conclusions than CIT does.

Relevant critiques of CIT and their National Security Alert include:
Summary and Analysis of “National Security Alert”, Chris Sarns, Feb 5, 2011
9/11 Pentagon Witnesses:  They Saw the Plane Hit the Pentagon, Video by Jeff Hill, June 14, 2010
Overwhelming Evidence of Insider Complicity, David Chandler and Jon Cole, Dec 2010
“Debating” What Hit the Pentagon by Exaggeration, Name-calling, and Threats, Gregg Roberts, Jan 2011

And critiques that examine CIT’s earlier work “Pentacon” are helpful as well:
Google Earth Exposes Pentagon Flyover Farce or Critiquing PentaCon ,  by Jim Hoffman, July 2009
To Con a Movement: Exposing CIT’s PentaCon ‘Magic Show’, Victoria Ashley, July 2009

Relevant peer-reviewed papers (posted on Journalof911Studies.com):
Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon, Frank Legge, (B.Sc.(Hons.), Ph.D.) and Warren Stutt, (B.Sc.(Hons.) Comp. Sci.)  January 2011
What hit the Pentagon? Misinformation and its Effect on the Credibility of 9/11 Truth, Frank Legge, (B.Sc.(Hons.), Ph.D.), July 2009 (updated Feb 2010)

There was a time in the four years after 9/11 when I simply assumed that the official story of the destruction of the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11 was true.  One could say that I “endorsed” the official story based on what I knew at the time, but as I learned more, my opinion of what happened to those buildings evolved radically. John Maynard Keynes, father of Keynesian Economics, once said: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” A similar evolution has occurred in relation to my view of CIT’s work.

I strongly recommend that people who care to research what happened at the Pentagon take personal responsibility for forming their own conclusions by acquainting themselves with a wide range of analysis done by people who have come before them rather than jumping to conclusions based on a skewed selection of evidence and argument, or being unduly influenced by any type of authority figure.  Use your own discernment, based on your use of the scientific method to arrive at a coherent theory that you can confidently stand behind.

One of the authors cited above, Frank Legge, PhD., admonishes us to adopt a “prudent approach” to the Pentagon piece of the 9/11 puzzle.  In the end he wisely advocates the “precautionary principle” which is to “assert only what we can truly know,” given the contradictory evidence, misinformation, disinformation, and lack of information from official sources, and the difficulty in verifying much of it, years after the fact and with inadequate resources.

Legge concludes that there is prima facie evidence that “the official explanation of the event at the Pentagon is false and that a cover-up exists. He concludes as well this negative hypothesis: that there is “no proof that a 757 did not hit the Pentagon.”  And, since officials are holding the cards (videos) as to what did or didn’t hit the Pentagon, Dr. Legge’s recommendation is that investigators “take care to avoid publicly asserting that the 757 did not hit the Pentagon”.
We can all agree that no hijacked plane should have been able to violate the airspace of our nation’s capital and hit the headquarters of the most sophisticated defense system in the world – an hour and a half after the assault began on the Twin Towers.

The 9/11 Truth movement will be more likely to succeed in its effort to educate the public about the Pentagon by focusing on those areas of greatest agreement.

Comments

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Listen Live

Recent Comments

Putin would have to be a complete moron to pull off MH17 after his very recent and successful BRICS attendance. Russia and a few other countries (China, Brazil, etc) are setting up their own development bank.

No doubt BRICS is pissing off the masters of international usury at the IMF and World Bank that will be left out in the dark. Maybe even enough to frame those that threaten their long standing economic strangle-control over the world?

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-brics-bank-20140716-story.html

By aussiematters on 2014 07 23 - 22:46:17
From the entry 'War monger Tony Abbott recklessy accuses the Russian President over downed passenger plane'.

Here, here Hereward!
Sad day for genuine Australian relations with Russia
Abbott and his deputy should be ashamed of their obvious haste to point the finger at Russian separatists, let alone Putin
Though there are more than ever before, an aware population of internet news grabbers, there are still far too many sheeple taking MSM as the truthful provider of news
Thank you for being one of the few radio presenters/journalists who tells us whats going on…..not what the manager/editor tells you to! I cannot believe the number of MS reporters that seem to break straight into a Russian beatup when interviewing anybody to do with MH17 disaster

By Davo on 2014 07 23 - 21:21:01
From the entry 'War monger Tony Abbott recklessy accuses the Russian President over downed passenger plane'.

Bubba, do a better job or shut it.
Also check out the old fella Leon Pittard at FairDinkumRadio.com and his radio show.

By aussiematters on 2014 07 23 - 18:43:39
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

Hey bubba luggs,

sit on it and spin.

Alex Jones had his day… He is OK to check out on every time something big happens to get a ‘conspiracy’ perspective, but 80% of his content is made up drivel. 15% is interesting and about 5% actually true.

No one in Australia is doing as gooder job as Heraward

NO ONE

By ROKBEBOP on 2014 07 22 - 00:20:35
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

What a Disgrace all these Zionists and Freemasons liars here trying to deny chemtrails ,Hey Clowns your game is up no matter how much you lie we know the truth ,you ‘Persons’ are blatant liars and also traitors . The only ignorants are the ones that believe your disgusting lies The ADF are traitors and liars , Chemtrails and Geo-Engineering are 100% real the Government of Australia the commonwealth of Australia are total frauds and operate with ‘No Basis In Law” when will the dumbed down aussies wake up that even Fluoride is Poison ,let alone the Toxic filth that is loaded into drums inside the plane where seats would normally be ,and then via a sophisticated array of piping and nozzles ,sprayed all over the dumb Goyim ,they even turn it off when they have passed over the towns involved .so don’t give me your filthy lies and say it’s Contrails when we know they are CHEMTRAILS .

By Bob McDonld on 2014 07 21 - 21:37:53
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Hey Bubba, you will never support anyone who is taking the time to dissect current issues because you are too distracted with quick overviews from other websites.  You only want to know the NEXT story, not what’s actually going on.  In regards to Herewards presentation of the show, what are YOU doing to challenge the mainstream distortion of events? Also, do you really enjoy listening to Alex Jones’ tired & irrelevant repetition’s of events in his life which waste half his air time?  Concentrate on the content and stop whining unless of course you think you can do a better job.  Hereward, you are doing an outstanding job (from a real Truth News subscriber).

By Zen Prepper on 2014 07 21 - 12:32:10
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

Wow Bubba, you sure are insightful. I guess you must be a subscriber eh? Good on you mate.

By Johnny Came Lately on 2014 07 20 - 21:13:06
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

I like the idea of Truth News and it is a great setup, but I can’t stand Hereward Fenton’s high pitched, annoying voice.  If you had a better speaker I would happily subscribe.  Also, a lot of your stuff seems a bit Johnny Come Lately as I find most of this on Drudge, Infowars and People’s Voice.  Hereward would make a great journalist writing articles and news stories, but don’t get him to talk on air.

By Bubba on 2014 07 20 - 19:52:26
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other blogs? I have a blog based on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e mail.

By WillianHeadlam on 2014 07 19 - 22:03:53
From the entry 'The pale shadow of democracy'.

Good onya Hereward, excellent job pointing out the bleeding obvious brainwashing mind control techniques so clumsily employed by the ABC and rest of the corporate controlled propaganda outlets. It really is sickening and while I applaud your efforts to expose and deconstruct this muck I don’t envy you the task, though I concede it really does need to be done. Personally I don’t have the stomach for it anymore ... since I gave up the MSM back in 2004, my tolerance for it has dropped to ZERO. Love your show, kepp up the good work.

By John Scrivener on 2014 07 14 - 16:50:31
From the entry 'Paul Gunter on nuclear power, WMDs and the Fukushima Daiichi disaster'.

Categories