Australians For Syria Protest in Sydney

12 August 2012 | Permalink | comments: 3
By Hereward Fenton

Share |

Categories: [ Syria ]

On 5 August 2012 a rally was held in Sydney in support of the Syrian government by members of the Syrian community and Australians.

Some four thousand people gathered peacefully at The Sydney Town Hall to express solidarity about the tragedy in Syria.

A number of speakers, from various sections of the community, addressed the audience concerning the external forces that have invaded Syria and are fighting the elected democratic government.

The people then marched peacefully to The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs in the Sydney city area, where more speakers addressed the people.

Appreciation for Russia and China voting against the US proposed UN-NATO involvement were expressed. The meeting then peacefully dispersed.

Comments

Thank you truth news. It will be a struggle for Syria as the fascist Americans have been terrorising sovereign democratic countries like this for 60 years and are very experienced at it.
I have read that soon, the American trained and financed terrorists may stage a false flag attack using chemical weapons and their corporate war criminal media will spread their text book propaganda in an attempt to make the world believe Syria unleashed the attack.

It is easy for us to say, only the stupid and ignorant will believe this false flag attack but 300 million American citizens are the most stupid & ignorant on this planet.

By Patrick Appleton on 2012 08 12 - 14:41:28

I have discovered an excellent journalist named DON DEBAR from the U.S. who is able to decipher and see through the corporate media bullshit and would highly recommend him as a source for learning Middle-East affairs and news items the mainstream wont deliver.

By Patrick Appleton on 2012 08 12 - 14:57:50

Hi Hereward,
I want to say thank you for this reporting. Your interview with the gentleman who quit the Greens was most enlightening and welcome. It was great to hear Tim Anderson speak - and Naja, the Syrian woman. I have written an article with transcriptions of those short interviews at candobetter.net/node/3034 and we have a section on Syria http://candobetter.net/taxonomy/term/3816 with a transcript of Mother Mariam’s call to stop foreign intervention in Syria and and links to Syrian Girl Partisan and other articles on the Middle East. Please feel welcome to contribute articles, films, comments on this and other matters, even where you do not agree with us. Controversy leads to truth. We didn’t like what happened in Libya either, or Bahrain… (I never did come to grips with Egypt though, due to a family crisis at the time). Anyway, I would like to express solidarity here. On candobetter.net we are very concerned about the democracy and ecology of having huge economic immigration to Australia, but refugees are a different category and make Australia’s participation/support in these terrible resource hegemony wars to isolate Iran all the more insane. What has happened to the anti-war movement in the Greens and the Socialist Alliance? What has happened to our political system that our once radical parties now dance to the same tune as the corporates? My support for Syria is based on peak-oil research in geopolitical history which shows that what is happening here is just more of the same. Sheila Newman (Ed.) The Final Energy Crisis, Pluto Press, UK, 2008 etc.

Sheila N

By Sheila Newman on 2012 08 25 - 10:05:39

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.

1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?

If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.