Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA

Deflating the HYPE - Can the seemingly imminent War with Iran be Stopped?

03 March 2012 | Permalink | comments: 5
By John Bursill

Categories: [ Iran ]

John Bursill
Article by John Bursill

Unfortunately it now appears that a war between the US and it’s allies with Iran is imminent. By any military analysts assessment this has a real chance of changing the current multi-theatre war against terrorism and so called rogue/terrorist states into a real World War III scenario!

Stop Iran War

Following the Main Stream Media (MSM) in the west over the last few months, you would be sensing that many things have happened to support the war with Iran rationale; hearing that Iran wants a Nuclear bomb and would be prepared to use it against Israel and the US. Other alarming stories include Iran trading in weapons with “rogue states”, Iran killing innocent people abroad, Iran’s President is insane and wants to “wipe Israel off the map”, Iran has been involved in terrorist plots/bombings and may attack inside the US and Iran is trading drugs. The list of baseless accusation goes on and on.

Interesting to remember that after 9/11 the MSM did little to question the actual events and who benefited but devoted massive media speculation to Iraq being involved while no evidence existed; managing to convince the vast majority of the American public that Saddam was involved with the 9/11 attacks leading to growing public support for the 2003 invasion.

Many times over the last decade it was obvious by the rhetoric out of Washington and from their many think tanks like PNAC (The Project for the New American Century) and leaked memos from the Pentagon that the Caspian Basin would be central to their future plans of an expanding Empire. The only obstacle was then generating the public and political support to do so. Prophetically the Neo-Con document “Rebuilding America's Defences (year 2000)” had said a “New Pearl Harbour” type event was required for this purpose and then very conveniently, it happened on September 11 2001. This facilitated the new American Empire they wanted by enraging the US population to a war mentality and allowing massive budget increases.

It was soon obvious which countries were marked for “regime change” or worse in the Middle East including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. The most probable reasons for the desire to control these countries was to complete it’s dominance of the Caspian Basin oil reserves, protect its allies Israel and Saudi Arabia and to ultimately usurp any possible arrangements between Iran, China, India and Russia that could threaten the trading of oil in US Dollars. In my opinion the US deep state believe if oil rich countries get the idea they can trade direct with sovereign nations without using the US dollar, the US Empire will certainly be finished, well economically at least. If this means the death of millions in the Middle East and of tens of thousands of their own troops by these wars then that’s fine with them as long as they keep control of the oil trade.

Oil Empire
This increasing projection of US force is even more likely as the US Empire begins to crumble for it will wish to deny the rising economic giants a secure supply of energy. To quote Michel Chossudovsky and Finian Cunningham in their recent article “War Plan Iran” “From the Western powers’ point of view, Iran is both an elusive prize and a frustrating obstacle. Bringing Iran back into the orbit of Western capitalist control has the added significance of depriving energy and other geopolitical advantages to rival powers, in particular Russia and China.” This situation is not going to be allowed to eventuate without pushing diplomatic relationships with China and Russia and many others to breaking point. Will they act economically or militarily is the only question in my view. Either way the world will be in for more economic stress, debt and expanding military budgets but most worryingly, a possible nuclear exchange.

So lets look at the picture being painted at present, i.e. the hype and propaganda v’s the actual situation and why this confrontation is now apparently imminent.

The situation;

Iran has no Nuclear Weapons Program says all US and western intelligence agencies
Iran is ideologically opposed to Nuclear Weapons
Iran has continued to threaten the US Dollar dominance trading through it’s own oil bourse dropping US dollar trade completely on March 20 this year
- China and Russia is increasingly upset by US Policy in the gulf and an Iran/Syria intervention may be the last straw
Massive build up of US military force in Persian Gulf
Positioning of large troop contingents in Israel and Kuwait 
War Games have recently escalated in the strait of Hormuz
US has recently announced the biggest ever arms sale to Saudi Arabia(60 Billion USD)
Israel is “ready” for war with Iran and could strike at any time
- US Sanctions on Iran, while diplomacy ends, historically means the next step is a military intervention
Russia prepared to use military force to protect interests in Gulf region say Russian Military Experts
Main Stream Media Critics of US Middle East Policy barely exist and continue to be shut down or sacked

 

The propaganda and hype;

Mainstream Media (MSM) support the Neo-Con agenda that Iranians are “determined to become a nuclear power” are “crazy” and will use it
The current US policy of sanctions is required to persuade Iran to stop it’s Nuclear Weapons Program 
Many allegations have been made by the US and its allies that implicates Iran in terrorist/criminal activities without any hard evidence
MSM are beating the drums of war again with baseless stories. A quick search of YouTube shows many spun stories making it seem like Iran is determined to get a nuclear weapon
Iranian Elected President Mamoud Ahmadinejad is continually misquoted to give a sense that he will “wipe Israel of the map” and believes the Jewish Holocaust never happened
The current line up of Republican Candidates ( except Ron Paul ) continue to call for war with Iran
Israel pushing hard for war and blaming Iran for attacks against their country without hard evidence 
Attacks against Iran and the murder of its scientists, supported by media and political talking heads as required and acceptable
Iran being set up for the next 9/11 “false flag” to give reason for US attack

So there’s the background, now to the question: ‘can the war with Iran be stopped’ by rational actors calling for truth and sanity in the face of such propaganda produced by strong Neo-Con/Israeli control of the media, the US Congress and even within the UN itself? Can we deflate the hype?

Well I would say it’s unlikely with the current state of the paralysed Peace Movement and completely controlled MSM world wide. But I do believe with a raising of awareness in the general public, of exactly how dangerous this war could be for us all, both physically and economically it is possible to put a stop to the Neo-Con/Israeli plan once again. Also the broad awareness that 9/11 and other pretexts to war are not what we are told, has weakened the popular support of governments pushing for war without proper investigation of the events that lead to them.

I have found that the argument against a war with Iran leading to a possible WWIII is very easy to make, even if you propose it to those who support the US Empires’ control of the Caspian Basin or it’s support of Israel. Because turning the Middle East into one big war theatre by a likely confrontation between the US and China/Russia is obvious madness. This only makes sense to a few warmongering power elite who care little for life; the progress towards peace or the stability of the region. As hard as it is to conceive, their are people controlling America who have always been prepared to risk nuclear war, seriously thinking they can win and rule the world.

I personally recently decided to start a process to address this situation in Sydney Australia by organising a truth awareness rally see: Say NO to a WAR with Iran! Deflate the WAR HYPE with Truth Awareness

 

Comments

WAR WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR (Besides banker profits)
 
  ABSOULTLEY NOTHING

the eastern pacific/carribeean/atlantic region according to FEMA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx3D5lxUJpU&feature=relmfu

http://therandomfact.com/concept-of-scientific-geo-engineering-to-artificially-cool-the-earth-is-discussed-by-the-un/2210732/

Concept of Scientific Geo-engineering to artificially cool the Earth is discussed by the UN

Radiation Management SRM (AKA geoengineering) for short is being discussed at COP 17 in Durban as a possible means of reducing the amount of radiation reaching the earth from the sun. Rather strange really as most of the IPCC type scientific lackeys have disputed the possibility of this actually causing changed weather systems on earth . They are far more prone to accusing you and I of being greedy with our use of carbon fossil fuels.

“Solar radiation management might sound, at first, like something from science fiction – but it’s not. There are already serious discussions beginning about it, and that’s why we felt it was urgent to create this governance initiative. Solar radiation management could be a Plan B to address climate change, but first we must figure out how to research it safely.” (plan A is to cut carbon dioxide emissions – what is known as AGW or CAGW)

So what exactly would this Plan B potentially comprise of? Various techniques have been suggested such as placing huge space reflectors in orbit to reflect the sun’s energy, releasing stratospheric aerosols into the upper atmosphere, and brightening clouds with seawater.

Playing God

Those who tend to be in the scientists shouldn’t “play God” school of thought are simply aghast that anybody could even seriously consider such a possibility for more than a split second. Their argument is that the unforeseen results could be utterly catastrophic, and that the report’s acknowledgement that deliberately attempting to pervert the course of the weather is fraught with danger is an understatement. The divine creation is magnificent and far more complex than humans could ever understand, so just let God, or nature if you prefer, get on with it, they say.

I MUST ADMIT I TEND TO AGREE WITH THAT STATEMENT.

Silvia Ribeiro, the Latin American director of the ETC Group, which campaigns against geoengineering, said:

“This report is dominated by scientists engaged in geoengineering research in the UK, US and Canada. They are advocates for more research; several of them have claimed patents and have significant financial, institutional and professional interests in the field of geoengineering research. There are the same familiar names that we have seen in a whole series of recent reports: John Shepherd or David Keith.

The Global warming – cooling – climate changing or whatever they are currently naming it mob, all have vested interests as far as I can tell. From the scientists who would lose immense amounts of funding were the truth to be known, and should they come out of their insulated closets to publicly admit they really have no proof, to the Green Energy Companies and right down to the Carbon Trading giants, all have a vested interest in seeing to it that we are told rather large fibs so that the money keeps flowing right into their bank accounts.

Should it be shown that there is no human causation for climate change and variations etc, then they would all be out of work – and good riddance I say!  No man-made climate change then all these new fangled taxation schemes would have to be done away with - hence the reason your governments won’t allow the truth to be known - they would lose your money arghhhhhh!

I am one of the many who are thrilled to see a second serving of delicious emails released, affectionately being called Climategate 2. These are finally putting into context the first round of emails released approximately two years ago. Some claimed all these emails have been taken right out of context, so now we have them in all their ugliness - in context for the world to see. Check them out do please.

“Solar radiation management technologies are high-risk and extremely dangerous and they should be treated under international law like nuclear weapons – except, unlike nuclear weapons, we have an opportunity to ban their testing and their proliferation them before the technology is fully developed, rather than trying to prevent their proliferation after the fact. This is where we should be looking to for guidance on governance. We need to ban these technologies, not facilitate their development.”

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8386006/court-security-orders-woman-to-take-off-tent

http://peterbdunn.wordpress.com/2010/07/03/processed-white-sugar-is-a-terrible-poison

By pbd62 on 2012 03 04 - 00:52:12

Spead this video over the world:
Attention! 3. Pearl Harbor stands just before http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRx4JlSVwWs

By wonderbird on 2012 03 22 - 05:20:50

Close HAARP at once! Secret weapon ist spread with 6 installations over the world. They can hover the athmosphere and smash it down! Have they caused Fukoshima, worldwide birds mass death, fish and bees dying??? When are we aim of this mass elimination weapon???

HAARP WEATHER CONTROL could be part of NWO DEPOPULATION PLAN, here’s the science.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TdIkI1ory8&feature=related 

Project ENOCH 2012: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOMq7axOvkY
Doomsday Project and deep events: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111123050622362
How Bush helped Hitler - http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar - SS=Skull and Bones - look at this video of John Buchanon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj1OdjNpqdI&feature=endscreen&NR=1

What about Georgia Guidestones? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

By jesuits had founded illuminati - masonry - bilderb on 2012 03 22 - 06:13:24

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY4HGs-9JiU HAARP

By Jesse Ventura clears up on 2012 03 22 - 07:38:44

Great article! Hopefully there will not be any war. We should pray about it actually.

By Bill Weavers on 2012 10 03 - 09:16:41

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Listen Live

Recent Comments

Hey bubba luggs,

sit on it and spin.

Alex Jones had his day… He is OK to check out on every time something big happens to get a ‘conspiracy’ perspective, but 80% of his content is made up drivel. 15% is interesting and about 5% actually true.

No one in Australia is doing as gooder job as Heraward

NO ONE

By ROKBEBOP on 2014 07 22 - 00:20:35
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

What a Disgrace all these Zionists and Freemasons liars here trying to deny chemtrails ,Hey Clowns your game is up no matter how much you lie we know the truth ,you ‘Persons’ are blatant liars and also traitors . The only ignorants are the ones that believe your disgusting lies The ADF are traitors and liars , Chemtrails and Geo-Engineering are 100% real the Government of Australia the commonwealth of Australia are total frauds and operate with ‘No Basis In Law” when will the dumbed down aussies wake up that even Fluoride is Poison ,let alone the Toxic filth that is loaded into drums inside the plane where seats would normally be ,and then via a sophisticated array of piping and nozzles ,sprayed all over the dumb Goyim ,they even turn it off when they have passed over the towns involved .so don’t give me your filthy lies and say it’s Contrails when we know they are CHEMTRAILS .

By Bob McDonld on 2014 07 21 - 21:37:53
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Hey Bubba, you will never support anyone who is taking the time to dissect current issues because you are too distracted with quick overviews from other websites.  You only want to know the NEXT story, not what’s actually going on.  In regards to Herewards presentation of the show, what are YOU doing to challenge the mainstream distortion of events? Also, do you really enjoy listening to Alex Jones’ tired & irrelevant repetition’s of events in his life which waste half his air time?  Concentrate on the content and stop whining unless of course you think you can do a better job.  Hereward, you are doing an outstanding job (from a real Truth News subscriber).

By Zen Prepper on 2014 07 21 - 12:32:10
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

Wow Bubba, you sure are insightful. I guess you must be a subscriber eh? Good on you mate.

By Johnny Came Lately on 2014 07 20 - 21:13:06
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

I like the idea of Truth News and it is a great setup, but I can’t stand Hereward Fenton’s high pitched, annoying voice.  If you had a better speaker I would happily subscribe.  Also, a lot of your stuff seems a bit Johnny Come Lately as I find most of this on Drudge, Infowars and People’s Voice.  Hereward would make a great journalist writing articles and news stories, but don’t get him to talk on air.

By Bubba on 2014 07 20 - 19:52:26
From the entry 'Dissecting doublethink on the Israel/Gaza conflict'.

Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other blogs? I have a blog based on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e mail.

By WillianHeadlam on 2014 07 19 - 22:03:53
From the entry 'The pale shadow of democracy'.

Good onya Hereward, excellent job pointing out the bleeding obvious brainwashing mind control techniques so clumsily employed by the ABC and rest of the corporate controlled propaganda outlets. It really is sickening and while I applaud your efforts to expose and deconstruct this muck I don’t envy you the task, though I concede it really does need to be done. Personally I don’t have the stomach for it anymore ... since I gave up the MSM back in 2004, my tolerance for it has dropped to ZERO. Love your show, kepp up the good work.

By John Scrivener on 2014 07 14 - 16:50:31
From the entry 'Paul Gunter on nuclear power, WMDs and the Fukushima Daiichi disaster'.

Hi Josh.
FYI. I don’t have time for a debate. I’m just supplying information for your perusal.  I’m a farmer in the South Burnett. I’ve been watching the skies all my life because my existence depends on the rate of precipitation. Too much or too little is a problem.
I have been watching the development of what we call chemtrails for at least 25 years. My research tells me that they have many nasty uses and are an integral part of geoengineering which you should also check out.
We have minimal jet, and air, traffic here except for when rain is imminent. At those times, depending on the likely amount of precipitation, we get numerous jets spewing out chemtrails that expand to many times the size of what leaves the exhaust of planes. (The few times we get a passenger plane there is either no contrail or one that disperses within a minute. ) Some days there are numerous planes spewing out the stuff: 2 and 3 at a time in some instances. Recently there were so many that the sky turned metallic grey and the sun was obscured to such a point that even the unenlightened were asking what on earth was going on. The metallic grey and sun phenomenon were observed from Gympie to Biggenden.
We had a flood in the early part of last year. The next rain of any use at all was in March this year. I thought it strange that it was just the right time to get farmers in the planting mood at just the right time. My suspicions were correct: no useful follow up rain so many that planted have already realised they wasted borrowed capital.
Believe what you wish but if this rot is not stopped more and more farmers will crash and burn. The general populace will be next.
Regards
Cris

By Cris on 2014 07 13 - 11:42:19
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

The article following my comment is from http://www.truthnews.com.au chemtrails segment titled “CONTRAIL SCIENCE which I can only describe as JUNK SCIENCE. This forum gets funnier by the day, or at least by the intervals of time wherein I come back to look for new jokes. I am, as is written here, ANY PILOT, as described by the author of the “CONTRAIL SCIENCE” segment below, and also an aircraft maintenance engineer, retired. I am somewhat amused by the glider pilot, JOSH ANONYMOUS who makes feeble attempts to “correct” what I have written every now and then, but then I suppose there is always room for even more humour.
For those who obviously do not understand the mechanics of contrails, I offer the following for consideration. As is known, one tonne of fuel cannot be magically converted to 1.5 or 3.5 tonnes of water, or whatever the magic figures are that are bandied about. The water that is produced in the creation of power/thrust from turbine engine combustion, both jet and propeller types at altitude, is a clear-cut matter. The fuel that is burned CONTRIBUTES to the formation of the resultant water droplets that are borne (past participle of bear) of the combustion process and pass into the freezing air behind the aircraft to be rapidly condensed and form a contrail (condensation trail).
To believe that an aircraft carries aloft water, in its fuel supply, sufficient to produce more than the weight of the fuel on board at take-off is simply nonsensical. To understand how the water is “produced” we need look no further than an example. On a clear blue winter day, with not a cloud in the sky, with ambient conditions (humidity, temperature, wind) in the suitable range, we note that a Boeing 747 burns about (approximately) 10 tonnes/hour of fuel (aviation kerosene) in cruise (4 engines) and we consider Pratt and Whitney JT-9 engines. The amount of air that is compressed and goes through the engines (4) in one second is approximately 2,832 cubic metres (100,000 cubic feet). All figures approximate due to unknown variations in ambient conditions. This means that there are about 2,832 x 60 x 60 cubic metres of air through the four engines every hour at cruise. i.e. 1,019,520 cubic metres per hour. The aircraft travels at about 500 knots True Airspeed (mach .85). Consider humidity to be say50%, for an example only, it means that the air mass is not saturated so NO CLOUD can or will form. The aircraft gathers and compresses air at a rate of 2,832 cubic metres each second, passing it through its engines at a ratio of 23.4 to 1.
A relative humidity of 100% means that the air can’t hold any more water vapour. It’s totally saturated. When this occurs, it can rain if the temperature falls. In fact, the RELATIVE HUMIDITY MUST BE over 100% where clouds have formed for it to rain. The relative humidity MUST BE 100% for cloud to form and supersaturation, i.e. over 100% relative humidity must occur for rain to fall. However, at ground level where the rain lands, the relative humidity can be less than 100%. So, at 50% humidity, there is no possibility of cloud forming, and all the water in the atmospheric air that is compressed and put through the can (the annular combustion chamber) will be instantly boiled, turned to steam and passed through the can and out the exhaust. Water does not burn, it simply changes state from liquid to gas, then back to liquid after being exhausted. As the water vapour reaches the outside freezing air it is immediately condensed and is seen as a contrail which is just condensation, hence the name “condensation trail”.

Now we begin to realise that on this clear day, with no cloud about, the exhausted condensation can only cool to the temperature of the surrounding atmosphere, and the water vapour will be absorbed by the surrounding drier air. Considering that that aircraft is surrounded by many cubic kilometres of drier air, we can see that here is no chance that the condensation can cause the surrounding air to become 100% saturated and form cloud. To claim so would be to say that, as an example, we could throw a bucket of ice cubes into an Olympic swimming pool and expect the ice cubes to freeze the surrounding water, or throw a bucket of boiling water into a similar swimming pool and expect the surrounding water to boil or even at least heat a little. Sorry, but absorption into the surrounds is what controls events. If the story of enduring contrails had any legs, we would have no need to spend fortunes, as we have over many decades, with attempts to seed cloud and make rain, we would just need to fly large aeroplanes around and around through clouds, or anywhere at all and even make it rain over deserts.

The claims that contrails “spread” out and form cloud are just plain, good old-fashioned bullshit spread by ignorant people.
If anybody knows any of the laws of thermodynamics that contradict what I have written here, please proffer it as I will be fascinated to see. C P Snow made the only real sensible comment about the laws of thermodynamics when he said that the first law tells you that you can’t win, and the second tells you that you can’t even break even.

And by the way, for the information of the author of the “CONTRAIL SCIENCE” there is NO solar heating of the atmosphere, as all heat rises from the ground after the sun’s heat passes through the atmosphere to the ground.

From http://www.truthnews.com.au
CONTRAIL SCIENCE
  For a contrail to form, suitable conditions must occur immediately behind a jet engine in the expanding engine exhaust plume. A contrail will form if, as the exhaust gases cool and mix with surrounding air, the humidity becomes high enough (or, equivalently, the air temperature becomes low enough) for liquid water to condense on particles and form liquid droplets. If the local air is cold enough, these newly formed droplets then freeze and form ice particles that make up a contrail.
  Because the basic processes are very well understood, contrail formation for a given aircraft flight can be accurately predicted if atmospheric temperature and humidity conditions are known.
  After the initial formation of ice, a contrail evolves in one of two ways. If the humidity is low, the contrail will be short-lived. Newly formed ice particles will quickly evaporate. The resulting contrail will extend only a short distance behind the aircraft. If the humidity is high, the contrail will be persistent. Newly formed ice particles will continue to grow in size by taking water from the surrounding atmosphere. The resulting line-shaped contrail extends for large distances behind an aircraft. Persistent contrails can last for hours while growing to several kilometers (spelling kilometres) in width and 200 to 400 meters in height. Contrails spread because of air turbulence created by the passage of aircraft, differences in wind speed along the flight track, and possibly through effects of solar heating.
  Thus, the surrounding atmosphere’s conditions determine to a large extent whether or not a contrail will form after an aircraft’s passage, and how it evolves. Other factors that influence contrail formation include engine fuel efficiency, which affects the amount of heat and water emitted in the exhaust plume.
  - source
TNRA is informed by science and is not interested in propping up anyone’s belief systems, and we don’t apologise for that.
But, please, don’t take it from me, speak to any meteorologist or ANY PILOT and they’ll tell you straight, that there is HUGE variation in the length and persistence of contrails. Sometimes they don’t form at all, other times they form, but dissipate quickly, other times they persist and spread out.
That’s the facts folks, and it’s been that way since planes first went up in the sky.
If you believe otherwise, I’m afraid you’ve been conned.
Forgive me if I seem rude or impatient on this topic, but every few months I come across a new wave of people who have been subjected to the same false propaganda about chemtrails, and I have to run the same arguments and cite the same articles over and over again. It does wear one’s patience down.
Before making some kind of angry reply, I urge you to read this article and associated links. It’s fairly detailed, and deals with most of the usual claims made by chemtrail alarmists.
Finally, let me qualify all this by saying that I do not doubt that geo-engineering programs exist, and that, indeed, some of the patented techniques discussed at international forums include the creation of artificial cirrus cloud. Does this, however, entitle you to conclude that every spreading contrail you see is an example of such geo-engineering? Think about it. (I have - LEONARD CLAMPETT)

By Leonard Clampett on 2014 07 12 - 22:34:31
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Ooooops,

Just to amend my previous post, “(pending),oligarchical, cataclysmic collapse”!

P.S

If permaculture is not your very best friend, “MAKE IT SO”..........................................

In Lak’ech.

By Macca on 2014 07 09 - 07:22:18
From the entry 'Elisa Barwick on the world economy'.

Categories