I listened to this interview, I thought John Bursill did a reasonably good job under the circumstances, given the superficial and trivializing nature of the interview in general. The other two came across as incredibly naive and poorly informed on the whole subject, which is not at all uncommon for mainstream media mouth pieces and propagandists promoting the official canard.

Why don’t people go straight to the point when discussing this topic. Building 7 was not hit, had no real fires to talk about and fell like the other two towers at freefall speed. Impossible!

Great, it ended on the “yucky” argument. ie. “Its too yucky to believe powerful men murder for money, so it can’t be true, it just can’t be!”

If only people actually studied history, they’d know false flag terror is the rule, not the exception.