Truth News Australia

Hereward Fenton

LATEST SHOW
Update on Assange, Bitcoin and abortion law Get the podcast »

Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?

13 May 2012
0 Comments

By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Chemtrails ]

Contrails over London in 1944

Vapour trails left by British bombers on route to attack flying-bomb sites encircle the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral. London, 1944.

All those who passionately believe that "contrails dissipate quickly" whereas "chemtrails linger" and are deeply offended by the sceptical position that TNRA takes in regard to these claims, are free to "unlike" Truth News.

If, on the other hand, you would like to engage in rational debate, you're most welcome to do so.

However, please be advised that the information I have to impart may be shocking and difficult to grasp if you have been a "chemtrail alarmist" for a long time.

The often cited claim that "normal contrails dissipate quickly" is total bunkum.

There is not a shred of science to backup that claim.  Nothing, nada, zippo!

Those who promote this idea are simply repeating something they read on a web page without checking sources.


 

CONTRAIL SCIENCE

For a contrail to form, suitable conditions must occur immediately behind a jet engine in the expanding engine exhaust plume. A contrail will form if, as the exhaust gases cool and mix with surrounding air, the humidity becomes high enough (or, equivalently, the air temperature becomes low enough) for liquid water to condense on particles and form liquid droplets. If the local air is cold enough, these newly formed droplets then freeze and form ice particles that make up a contrail.

Because the basic processes are very well understood, contrail formation for a given aircraft flight can be accurately predicted if atmospheric temperature and humidity conditions are known.

After the initial formation of ice, a contrail evolves in one of two ways. If the humidity is low, the contrail will be short-lived. Newly formed ice particles will quickly evaporate. The resulting contrail will extend only a short distance behind the aircraft. If the humidity is high, the contrail will be persistent. Newly formed ice particles will continue to grow in size by taking water from the surrounding atmosphere. The resulting line-shaped contrail extends for large distances behind an aircraft. Persistent contrails can last for hours while growing to several kilometers in width and 200 to 400 meters in height. Contrails spread because of air turbulence created by the passage of aircraft, differences in wind speed along the flight track, and possibly through effects of solar heating.

Thus, the surrounding atmosphere’s conditions determine to a large extent whether or not a contrail will form after an aircraft’s passage, and how it evolves. Other factors that influence contrail formation include engine fuel efficiency, which affects the amount of heat and water emitted in the exhaust plume.
- source

TNRA is informed by science and is not interested in propping up anyone's belief systems, and we don't apologise for that.

But, please, don't take it from me, speak to any meteorologist or any pilot and they'll tell you straight, that there is HUGE variation in the length and persistence of contrails. Sometimes they don't form at all, other times they form, but disspate quickly, other times they persist and spread out.

That's the facts folks, and it's been that way since planes first went up in the sky.

If you believe otherwise, I'm afraid you've been conned.

Forgive me if I seem rude or impatient on this topic, but every few months I come across a new wave of people who have been subjected to the same false propaganda about chemtrails, and I have to run the same arguments and cite the same articles over and over again. It does wear one's patience down.

Before making some kind of angry reply, I urge you to read this article and associated links. It's fairly detailed, and deals with most of the usual claims made by chemtrail alarmists.

Finally, let me qualify all this by saying that I do not doubt that geo-engineering programs exist, and that, indeed, some of the patented techniques discussed at international forums  include the creation of artificial cirrus cloud. Does this, however, entitle you to conclude that every spreading contrail you see is an example of such geo-engineering?

Think about it.

Related Links

Comments

Please review the Terms of Service before reading or responding to comments.

Well, you’re getting the discussion you want. This is the first evidence I have seen of “respectable” airlines like Qantas also being involved. I have seen evidence that budget airlines like Ryanair and Easyjet are part of it but Peter Kuznir is showing me something I didn’t know. Thank you for furthering my education.

Good luck with your self-appointed consultant role with Robert Forgette. I won’t check with him that your advice is really being appreciated by him if you would rather I didn’t.

However, as a means of warding off possible future incidents with passengers on flights I must say that “helping” Robert with his lawsuit does not seem a very effectual thing to be doing. Even in the event that a lawsuit against aerosol spraying from aircraft goes ahead with considerable support from local government as in Suffolk County, Long Island
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27866
the findings will be overruled because federal legislation, not county-level, legislation is what applies.

Initially I thought that what you were doing was organizing people with the same views as yourself to have discussion and opposition to chemtrails activity banned.  That WOULD be a useful thing to do as it would trigger the confrontation that is being fobbed off through various rather thin and increasingly less convincing subterfuges.

The ETC group’s activity has been confined to working in the international organizations and unlike the Long Island Skywatch activists in Norfolk County they avoid involvement in contrails vs chemtrails discussion, but nevertheless they have come up with something that can be represented as a moratorium on the type of activity you believe could not possibly be happening and presumably should not be happening. Even if that moratorium is not being enforced, isn’t working for such a moratorium perhaps a little more purposeful than what you are doing?

I gather from what you say that you must have seen Mike Murphy’s “What in the World are they Spraying” and not been convinced by it. If you would like to treat yourself to an even more extreme and “unbelievable” scenario, check out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=pzW5Kb8u0Og

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 09 - 11:28:32

Leonard Clampett,

you are right when you state that a jet plane does not change the conditions around and behind it very much when passing by.

The point is that even a change this small may be sufficient to initiate a cloud creation process if the conditions are favorable.
The Wikipedia article article about cloud physics has a paragraph on Supersaturation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_physics

In short: the water for a spreading contrail is already present before the plane comes through.

A more illustrative way of showing how atmospheric conditions are influencing trail creation is here (needs Java):
http://profhorn.aos.wisc.edu/wxwise/AckermanKnox/chap15/contrail_applet.html

In some humid conditions you get condensation even from the aerodynamic disturbances created by the body and the wings of a plane. Google “aerodynamic contrail” and look at the images found.

By Josh on 2012 07 09 - 14:10:53

Wayne

I am going to ignore the rather obvious attempt at provocation when you say that Qantas is now involved. Instead I am going to invite you to attempt to answer any one of the questions I originally posed; now you know my position, consider them non-rhetoric in your case.

And feel free to contact Robert if you wish.

By Mike Glynn on 2012 07 09 - 21:40:25

Confessions of one’s real attitude cannot just be taken back or unsaid, Mike Glynn.

Thank you for the permission to contact Robert, or try to.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 04:24:48

Yes, typical of the attitude I find amongst the Chemmie community.

When the hard questions come up you hide, play the man, change the subject… basically do anything to avoid having to confront reality, or someone who might, just might, know what they are talking about.

I have about 15 other airtight reasons why it is simply not possible for commercial airliners to be involved in any chemtrailing, not that I expect any engagement on them from you. It seems that you can be grouped with Mr Kusznir, an ostrich squawking loudly from underground… which is really not a compliment of any sort.

By Mike Glynn on 2012 07 10 - 07:35:43

Is the ETC group “part of the Chemmie community” Mike Glynn?

(“Chemmie”, what a word! Dripping with its unexamined Cold War assumptions. Your attitudes and language have been shaped by a very specific troll culture Mike Glynn.)

Now, answer my question.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 10:20:35

Is the ETC group “part of the Chemmie community” Mike Glynn?

(“Chemmie”, what a word! Dripping with its unexamined Cold War assumptions. Your attitudes and language have been shaped by a very specific troll culture Mike Glynn.)

Now, answer my question

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 10:21:59

“Troll”, what a word! Dripping with unvarnished attempts to suppress the truth. Its is right up there with ...whats the other words you guys use to attempt to discredit someone who presents an argument you cannot otherwise counter….shill? Disinfo agent? CointelPro?

  Quick answer Wayne… I don’t care who they are. They have nothing to do with the subject of this thread. Now I have answered your question… how about you take a stab at… well just one of mine? Pick any one… take your time.

regards

Mike

By Mike Glynn on 2012 07 10 - 11:42:00

“I have joined a Facebook group that is suing over Geo-Engineering and Chemtrails. Not because I believe for a second that they will be successful, but because I wish to see an end to this as I believe that if it continues to gather steam then pilots and aircraft will be placed in danger by extremists. By advising them on aviation matters for the lawsuit I can assist in the ending of this question. Search for Chemtrail and Geo-Engineering lawsuit on Facebook. The owner of that group, Robert Forgette will vouch for me.”

When I read these words of Mike Glynn, about this group that was “suing”, owned by a Robert Forgette who will “vouch for” Mike Glynn, I naturally assumed that the group he was referring to was “suing” chemtrails activists for sowing panic for no good reason and by extension making themselves potential de facto instigators of terrorist actions. Such activity would certainly be illegal and I therefore found this apparent new development extremely interesting. There is all the difference in the world between trollish threatening and intimidating of individual “chemmies” on discussion fora and decisive real-world legal measures, bringing the whole subterranean “chemmie” vs “troll” intenet psychodrama into the light of day and the scrutiny of the public.

When Mike Glynn expressed scepticism over the lawsuit’s chances of “being successful” I thought that what he was referring to was the ideal of “freedom of speech” that a group targeted in this way might attempt to evoke. But surely “freedom of speech” is an idea that cannot be allowed to shield those whose danger-mongering and baseless accusations are leading to incidents like the one that occurred on the flight that Mike Glynn referred to.

It is more than disappointing that what Mike Glynn is doing amounts to nothing more than rather confused and possibly not altogether welcome “advisory” participation in a group of “chemmies”.

It is not possible for him to initiate something like what I imagined he was already doing: suing chemtrails activists for the spreading of baseless rumour?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_person_be_prosecuted_for_yelling_fire_in_a_crowded_building_when_there_is_no_fire

Can a person be prosecuted for yelling fire in a crowded building when there is no fire?

Answer
Yes, it’s called Reckless Endangerment. When you make an action like that intentionally and knowing that there is no such danger, it encourages an action in the crowd that you would have probable reason to suspect panic. People get injured in panics. To put people in danger knowingly and without justification is illegal in all states. But get hold of a lawyer for specific citations.

So, another question, Mike Glynn, if you are NOT in fact doing what I thought you were doing, why aren’t you?

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 15:36:26

Ad hominen attacks Wayne? That is straight out of the playbook isn’t it?
I have explained, up front, my reasons for advising this group; if they are beyond your grasp I cannot help that.

Can you please cease with the evasion and attempt one single answer of the questions I asked… lest people start seeing right through you, if they haven’t already?

By Mike Glynn on 2012 07 10 - 15:49:43

I can answer the question the way you answered my question. In fact I already have, in the earlier exchanges with Josh. In great detail. If you want to know what is happening in the sky, the chemtrail vs contrail argument is the surest way of not finding out.

How could it not be? It is an argument that was set in motion by the same people who dreamed up the idea of “solar radiation management”. Say that your solar radiation management is merely aircraft exhaust, until such times as you can legalize what you are doing.

This exchange is going to become repetitive and time-wasting if you don’t face up to the fact that I have no more intention of playing “your game” than you apparently have of playing mine.

The controllers of this thread will shut it down.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 15:59:31

You have many more opportunities than I have of finding out the technical details of how it is being done, how they are managing to do it, in the case of the aircraft and flights that you are involved with.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 16:04:46

Wayne Hall,

as long as nobody is showing convincing evidence that “it is being done”, it isn’t. So the “how” question is entirely obsolete until that time.

By Josh on 2012 07 10 - 18:20:37

Mike Glynn,

I suspect you won’t get any sensible reply from Wayne Hall. I also conclude from some of his postings that he is feeling targeted which adds an unhealthy aspect to his behaviour. Maybe he is best left alone.

By Josh on 2012 07 10 - 18:21:47

Leonard Clampett was willing to involve himself in discussion on the basis of “it isn’t being done”.  Is he still, I wonder?

Anyway, I have had some communication from Robert M. Forgette, and although I have no intention of trying to involve him in the time-wasting sado-masochism of the discussion here, perhaps there is now some hope of light being shed on the psychology of Mike Glynn, who says that Robert will “vouch for” him.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 18:38:19

Well, I have seen the correspondence between Mike Glynn and Robert M. Forgette, or what Robert says is the correspondence, and I guess there is no reason not to believe him. It is true that there is politeness on both sides and indeed a reassurance from Robert that “your presence here is appreciated”. Mike also mentions that at one chemtrails group he enrolled in as soon as they found out who he was they closed down or relocated. He also expresses a fear that activists may not believe he is really a pilot. I must say that it never occurred to me not to believe that he is who he says he is. The correspondence contains discussion of a proposed scheme to send up a capsule to test the content of the chemtrails. Mike says that he thinks once the result of such a test becomes known this will be enough to disprove the assertions of chemtrails activists. 

Given that no results of the test in question have as yet been announced, no conclusions can be drawn from all this.

If Mike and/Josh did something similar to what I did with Robert and asked of the ETC group the questions I suggested they should ask, perhaps we could get some more constructive input.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 20:19:21

COPY/PASTE from Wayne Hall’s last post above:

-The correspondence contains discussion of a proposed scheme to send up a capsule to test the content of the chemtrails.

-Followed by:  Mike says that he thinks once the result of such a test becomes known this will be enough to disprove the assertions of chemtrails activists.
—————————————————————————————————

Hi Wayne,
Wanted to make a note of these statements… There was no “Discussion” of the Capsule, but a Mention of what we were thinking may be something we were going to do, followed by Mike’s response “Seemingly” supporting the idea.  After his response, we decided to utilize an actual Pilot to obtain the sample, since that person offered.  BOTH SIDES of this topic, share the same interest when you cut away all the BS and arguments… ~What’s In The Trails?~ Simple as that right?

Wanted to make sure what I shared with you and what you meant to say are clearly understood by all.  Since my perception of what you just wrote leaves me feeling like it’s not an exact match, I think it’s important for me to copy/paste the actual correspondence I’m referencing in this post.  After all, I did take the time to put it all together and answer you without any details missing. 

COPY/PASTE from my inbox:

Robert M Forgette
May 11
Robert M Forgette

  This is what we will be using… (HARC LINK WAS REFERENCED)

Michael Glynn
May 14
Michael Glynn

  Hi Robert… interesting…if it has a reliable altitude reporting system it should get useable results for you.

  A thought has occurred to me as an alternative or a supplement.

  Have you considered spectroscopy?

  If it is possible to read the spectral composition of a galaxy billions of light years away I would have thought it very possible to point a spectroscope at a piece of blue sky as a control, and then at a trail for analysis. I don’t know anything much about the mechanics of spectroscopy, but it may be worth looking into.

Robert M Forgette
May 14
Robert M Forgette

  Me neither, but since my last reply, David Michael Tweedie has volunteered to take a plane up and sample the air directly. [:)] Very exciting to see people step up and help.

By Robert M Forgette on 2012 07 10 - 21:11:55

Hi again Wayne,

Had one more thing to clear up. 
————————————————————————————-
You stated:  Well, I have seen the correspondence between Mike Glynn and Robert M. Forgette, or what Robert says is the correspondence…
————————————————————————————-

-While I realize “what I say” is always Honest, others like yourself whom don’t know me, should speculate my honesty.  I would expect no less, until you knew me better and could get a feel for the way I am.  Since my honesty’s very important not only to myself, but for the Group I’m heading with it’s original Founder Al DiCicco, I find it equally important to clear up any statement containing: “or what Robert says is the correspondence…”  ...
-Especially when you received this correspondence as an actual Forwarded Internal Message within the Facebook Platform, which clearly shows as it does in the attached “Screen Shot” link below. 
-I appreciate you coming and inquiring about Michael and realize you may have a lot going on.  Thinking you may have thrown it all together best you could with limited time is all.  I’d rather think this to be the case.

Thanks for the opportunity to post here and thanks for reading.  smile

Peace!
Robert M Forgette

By Robert M Forgette on 2012 07 10 - 21:32:41

Thank you Robert. When I said “I have seen the correspondence between Mike Glynn and Robert M. Forgette, or what Robert says is the correspondence, and I guess there is no reason not to believe him” this was just a statement of fact, as I think you appreciated later when you thought more about it. 

I can’t see much difference between my report and the record you post here. I didn’t mention the detail about spectroscopy because it seemed speculative and inessential.

Yes, I should have said “mention of a proposed scheme” rather than “discussion of a proposed scheme” but the basic points about the general politeness, your saying that Mike’s “presence here is appreciated” were all reported by me accurately.

Also, your point that “BOTH SIDES of this topic, share the same interest when you cut away all the BS and arguments… ~What’s In The Trails?~ Simple as that” is not something I dispute. I merely add say: “Mike says that he thinks once the result of such a test becomes known this will be enough to disprove the assertions of chemtrails activists.”

Which is not something I think Mike would dispute. 

But the results of the test are not yet known, so if we were to adopt the spirit of your test we would not be arguing, and we HAVE been arguing, nastily. .

The discussion here has been quite different from the discussion between Mike and you. Mike first joined the debate here with references to a “gigantic hoax, perpetrated out of the US for the personal gain of a few. Carnicom is one… Morgellons research?!?!? give me a break. Michael J Murphy is another peddling his silly videos.

I have done all my arguing on Youtube and Facebook. I want some answers from you CT theorists.

The chemtrail hoax should be very easy to see through by anyone applying some very basic critical thinking.”

In a private message to Mike I said at that point: “You will understand that after ten years of involvement with this subject, including with every manner of debunker and troll, who often have no hesitation about pursuing their attacks into one’s real-world environment, one is not just going to stand to attention and say “yessir” to any bystander who wants to move into the discussion with a peremptory “prove it” demand, enlisting arguments some of which are familiar to the point of nausea and others which make one wonder “yes, what COULD be the explanation?”.

Therefore I would suggest to you that we initiate exploration of this topic by your inquiring of the ETC Group, who organized at Nagoya the moratorium on geoengineering projects including solar radiation management whether they believe that this moratorium is being respected and/or implemented.

If you do as I ask you to do, relations between us will be more equal and we will be in a better position to explore together the situations to which you say you wish to find answers.”

In other words, Robert, I was proposing an alternative way of exploring this subject to the way that you are your group are pursuing. But Mike’s response was to say: “all of those questions (i.e. the questions he himself had been asking) were rhetoric and intended to demonstrate the fallacy of the chemtrail hoax when applied to real world. There is no answer to them that would satisfy any critical thinker as to veracity of chemtrails, particularly as applied to commercial airline flying.

Later on in the increasingly nasty argument, I said to Mike: “To say it for the umpteenth time: I think the contrails versus chemtrails debate is the LAST way to understand anything about what is happening, and what is being proposed.

To judge from his video, Robert Forgette is having some problems with his group and is working on a strategy for weeding out people he regards as not helping with his objectives.

If you asked me to try to contact him to cross check what he says about you and your role in his group and what you yourself say (this is the equivalent of my proposing that you should contact ETC) I would do so.”

Finally I did and that brings us up to the present. I am grateful to you for being so generous with time and information, which has very much helped the discussion here.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 10 - 22:25:55

There could be some possibility of collaboration between the supporters of the following:                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M528c41GWs&feature=youtu.be      and what a number of members of the government of Cyprus have said they will support http://www.enouranois.gr/english/epistolesenglish/indexcyprusperdikis.htm

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 11 - 01:20:08

Page 5 of 55 pages ‹ First  < 3 4 5 6 7 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments

RECLAIM AUSTRALIA IS DOOMED

Although I agree with many of their ideas, the forces reigned against RAM are too great, violent, statist and reactionary for them to remain a non-political, broad based, multi-ethnic, community protest group for much longer. The Left and their Antifa nihilist fellow travelers are already pushing them towards the extreme Right, by calling them racists and Islamophobes and so on. Whilst the extreme Right have aligned themselves with RAM. With fascists of the Left and Right pressuring them they will not be able to remain beyond the Left-Right divide and will inevitably move to the Right - the extreme Right. Which is already happening. A development which will alienate decent Australians of all ethnic backgrounds many of whom currently support them. 

The RAM leadership have already established open alliances with the Patriotic Front (the ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration) Australia First and Golden Dawn, a Greek neo-Nazi party. Members of these collectivist groups are currently attending RAM demonstrations all over Australia.

There is a real need in Australia to establish a political movement beyond the Left-Right divide and their vested interests, a movement that questions the current direction Australia is heading i.e. the direction the Left/Right and their extremes would like to take it; that questions the efficacy of state sponsored multiculturalism, as opposed to a proper, non-discriminatory immigration policy; that questions the validity of political correctness; that is politically neutral, anti-war and pro environment; that is opposed to all collectivists ideologies (fascisms of the Left and Right); that would dismantle the power pyramids of corporations and banks and their ability to impact on government; that would dissolve all anti-terror laws and all laws that impose on the rights and freedom of the individual and the people.   

(The ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration)

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reclaim-australia-rally-set-for-sydney-on-sunday-20150718-gifb9s.html

http://australiafirstparty.net/news/reclaiming-australia-queensland-senate-campaign/

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 07 26 - 15:36:56
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Hello there I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don韙 have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

By Prova a Adidas Neutro Originals Nizza Nero Giallo on 2015 07 20 - 08:41:30
From the entry 'Statism, the greater good and the big lie'.

I second Keith’s assertion that Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake.  He bangs on about Halaal being a scam and money maker for Islam (and no I don’t support Halaal whatsoever), but makes excuses for its counterpart Kosher as being a somehow legitimate.  Double standards?  When I confronted him about this fact he went off on a convoluted tirade about Israel being some sort of “Bastion of Democracy” in the middle east…Really!, I will leave that one up to the readers to decide on.  I found that MH came across as disingenuous to say the least.

By Citizen Scorn on 2015 07 19 - 07:33:43
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

Without doubt, TNR is one of the best, if not the best alternative news source on the net. Which doesn’t mean Herewood is always right. His job, I believe, is to present the facts as he sees them as an objectively as possible, without fear or favor.  For this, he has my respect and support. But I believe he needs to be careful and to think a little deeper about the problems of “racism,” in Australia. He has labelled the Reclaim Australia Movement as racist. I’m wondering if his objectivity is a little weak on this point, a little without foundation.

Of course all political movements have its fringe groups and individuals. We make a distinction between, for example, a Muslim and a fundamentalist Muslim (Islamist), and by so doing we don’t claim that all Muslims are blood thirsty fanatics. If its good for the Muslims, then its good for RAM, which is bound to attract a few lunatics and real racists. But to brand the entire movement as “racist” is wrong; it is the same ploy that is used by the mainstream media and its left-wing, establishment Marxist boot boys.

One of the first things I noticed when i attended a RAM rally recently were the amount of non-white people in attendance, including Aboriginals. In fact the main banner of RAM contains an Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag. Speakers at their rallies have included Jews, Arabs, Indians, Aboriginals, Chinese and so on. What does this tell you? Is this really a fascist-Nazi-racist movement whose stated aim are the eradication and exclusion of other cultures, in place of some sort of Aussie white Reich, or is this just propaganda that is being propagated by the left for their own political interests. Consequently, we all know where the culmination of their politics have led, historically speaking, which are to the imposition of terror and dictatorships.

We can be thankful for small mercies, in terms of the Left, which today mostly tends to attract collectivists, establishmentarians and the privileged sons and daughters of the upper bourgeoisie, who seems to share one thing in common, nativity….

By Eugene on 2015 07 18 - 16:03:54
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake.  He hasn’t even been citizen for but a few years.  But, he makes out like he was born there.  ALSO - this guy spent 30 years in Thailand working shady businesses.  I would wager that his primary purpose in being an activist is that he wants to make money off selling merchandise.

By Keith on 2015 07 17 - 20:51:15
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

good to see you putting out some new shows heraward

freely the banana girl is to a certain extent a troll, as is her boyfriend durian rider. they have been trolling the fitness community on youtube for some time… and yes they are extreme but they are also trolls. They use their trolling to spread their message. currently, another dude called vegangains is trolling the fitness community as well.

i am a vegetarian, and it was seeing this documentary on the pork industry that started me on the vegetarian path. for anyone interested, its pretty off the charts disturbing and its australian as well. its pretty much made by dudes breaking into pork farms and filming what they find

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KArL5YjaL5U

Would the world be better if people cared where their food came from? probably, they might then care about other things too

do you become a better person if you dont eat meat? i feel like a better person mainly because animals aren’t being hurt because of me. i dont feel humans have to eat meat really… or at least not much. How can you watch that documentary on pork, know that that is pretty much whats going on and turn a blind eye to it? I think its basic empathy and just saying well ‘i like bacon so yeah’ is in my opinion wrong and i can see freleys point of view to an extent. In my opinion, at least these people believe in something. i see my money as my vote, henceforth im ethical as to what i do with it. free range eggs became mainstream for exactly this reason… although im pretty sure woolies and coles lobbied the state to change the definition of the word ‘free range’ at some point. I dont eat beef because the amount of resources that go into growing a cow are pretty crazy. Think about how much grass that cow needs to eat before it is harvested and how much space it requires. think of how many vegies you could grow in the same space with the same amount of water. lamb? comon, think about what your doing here… but that being said i think most vegans are total loons. People like freeley should be advocating for the destruction of lions and tigers, as lions and tigers murder other animals in truly horrific style. if we humans are smart enough to not harm animals, then we should be stopping the animals that harm other animals from existing. Freeley also kills birds when she flies in aeroplanes so she is a hypocrite.

feminism is one of the biggest problems in society today and although there is some valid historical basis to it, the liberation of the human female from their biology is in my opinion largely a product of the technological advance of humans. sufferagettes where never machine gunned on the streets, unlike the men that where drafted and sent off to war to die just a few years earlier. as technology has advanced, women have advanced as well, however now its going way too far and is pretty blatantly anti male in many respects. i view feminism in its modern context as a tool of the social marxists that really isnt doing society a great deal of good at this time. its screwing up gender dynamics and is wrecking women and men for each other. i see it as low frequency, lowest common denominator idiocy, just like a lot of the the race baiting ‘is this racist’ stuff getting around that is being perpetuated pretty much as a distraction, divide and conquer strategy by the power elite. idiots love this kind of bicker and beef… it would be funny if it wasn’t so serious

anyway

I agree with steven friar. gods a maniac

good show… keep making them

By r0Kb3B0p on 2015 07 14 - 21:05:32
From the entry 'Addictions, obsessions, fanaticisms and distractions'.

Really truthfull.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:56:36
From the entry 'Defending your personal health choices'.

Yeah sure authority aware.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:28:55
From the entry 'What is the future of Australia?'.

Stay tuned for more rules here as usually is the case!!!

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:21:50
From the entry 'Mass media disinformation and brainwashing dissected'.

Almost two months since the last broadcast! How the hell can you expect people to donate when you don’t broadcast? Looks like the ship of truth has sprung a leak. This broadcast has been part of my life almost since its inception…it is one of the few alternative news sources that hasn’t gone off the deep end, by dilution credible information with crap e.g. Fairdinkum Radio and Info Wars…Pittard started FR with some incredibly interesting material, but then he flipped…Today he sounds like a fundamentalist preacher, the Christian equivalent to a Fanatical Islamist. As an atheist, I think he’s really ###### up a potentially good show. As for Info Wars, all they would have to do to improve is dump Alex Jones, what a shit-for-brains. I reckon Jones and Pittard are allowed to proliferate, because they’re so stupid and harmless. I suppose they have some entertainment value, and along with David Icke are living examples of how low the alternative media has sunk. Truth News Radio is, or should I say was, way ahead of them all ahead of them all in terms of credibility How sad that its come to this.

By Eugene on 2015 06 28 - 17:28:56
From the entry 'Introducing Internet.org: Mark Zuckerberg's free 'private' internet which will soon be rolled out to 4 billion+ people'.

Categories