Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

911: The side they’ll never print

26 May 2011 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Amina Youssef | 18 March 2011

http://amaarantine.tumblr.com/post/3920160056/911-the-side-theyll-never-print

The events of September 11, 2011 were a catastrophe that shook the global population by its roots. An inhumane act largely unprecedented in the modern world was unleashed onto society causing a wave of fear and ‘terror’ that would significantly effect the years to come. Islamaphobia increased, racial hate became more prevalent, and the world turned a blind eye to the incoming or rather, ongoing suffering of Arabs and Afghans in the occupied regions of the Middle East. This is not to suggest that thoughts which did not exist were aroused on that day. Undoubtedly there was a seed, a fear of the unknown, that lay dormant and was awoken through nourishment provided by western propaganda. 

Prejudice and racial discrimination against Muslims was solidified due to the blame that was placed on an isolated minority of “Radical and fundamentalist Muslims”. ‘Terrorists’, a picture of the fallen towers, and the word ‘Muslim’ occupied every front paper on the Globe. Since it was they themselves who claimed to be brothers and sisters regardless of blood lines, it could only be said then that all were either directly or indirectly a terrorist by association.  This ‘Terrorist’ label was applied on Muslims before any tangible proof or thorough investigation could be undertaken. This became a significant problem especially since the American Government to the current day fails to outline any transparency of processes or tangible information to affirm that it was ‘Allah’s advocates’ who undertook this act of inhumanity. 

This is not to suggest that I am not in sympathy with those who suffered on that frightful day. On the contrary, I write this in order to allow victims of September 11 to have the rightful perpetrators of extreme violence to be put to trial so that it may possible to retain any justice left in the world. Any of you who have watched raw videos or heard audio recordings of the day can agree with me that the event was a tragedy. For those of you who do not agree, then perhaps you are on the wrong page. 

We all listened to the desperate voices calling out through telephone lines for someone to save them. We all witnessed the tears falling of those who were forced to recount the last words of their trapped loved ones. We all heard of the people who leaped from windows out of sheer desperation to be liberated from the internal and physical battle of slowly oncoming death. No human should be trapped in such a way that forces one to die a thousand times before the end finally comes. 

Undoubtedly, the people who planned and carried out the lethal acts were terrorists of the worst kind. Their emotional indifference to their human counter parts and the suffering that it would cause really strikes hard at the reasonable mind. This attack was not only one on people on that day and in that building. Their hijacking of the buildings tore through the human psyche of the Western population. It ravaged through centuries of peaceful streets and buildings that Islam had built through it’s beauty and tolerance. It tore apart hearts everywhere and hardened them creating a barrier between Islam and the non Muslim entities of the world.

George Bush accompanied by Western Media declared that the attacks were planned and executed by non other than the American trained Muslim terrorist Osama Bin Laden and his followers.

I was 11 years old at the time when the twin towers hit the buildings. I was ready to accept that Osama Bin Laden had convinced his little radical sheep to hijack planes in order to kill Non-Muslims (and Muslims alike). But I am no longer young, naiive and stupid. 

The evidence presented to us now conflicts with what Americans declared happened on that day. For example, 911truth.org is a group of officials such as Architects, lawyers, firefighters etc who came together demanding truth and transparency regarding the terrible events that left thousands of people dead. They have publicly spoken about the fallacies of what the Government dignitaries have supported. How is it that the tower fell down in such perfect vertical alignment? Why was there a series of explosions going off in the various levels of the building BELOW where the plane hit? How did the vehicles containing the explosives even get in through WTC security? And most importantly how did the passport of the supposed ‘Muslim’ hijacker be discovered in the debris and rubble during the aftermath yet the black boxes which are meant to be virtually indestructible be gone beyond repair? What lunacy! If you are ready to believe that a passport survived from the top of a high rise burning building to the bottom then I suggest to you that you are of poor mind. 

Whoever orchestrated these attacks needs to be brought to justice. The effects of the terrorist attacks on September 11 did not end on that day. These criminals have caused over one Million deaths of Iraqis, Afghanis, and foreign soldiers including Americans and Australians in the Middle East due to Bush’s atrocious and ill made “War on Terror”. 

They have created a rift between Muslims and Non-Muslims, and stamped an irreversible scar on the families of the 911 victims. Non-Muslim psyche’s were hit and charged with fury and hate. How very convenient since now most of the Western World feels a great sense of indifference to the suffering, pain and increasing death of Muslims in the Middle East by unwelcome occupiers and terrorists such as Israel. 

If this veil that has blinded them after 911 which Western Media was the direct instigator of could be removed they would be able to see the atrocities and war crimes that Israel incites on the West Bank and East Jerusalem on a daily basis. They would no longer see the death of the Arab and Afghan children in the middle east as collateral damage. 

Let the truth be exposed so that the world can work together to allow the future to be decorated with light and togetherness. Peace and tolerance can be promoted through the existence of truth and criminal accountability that can be placed on an individual regardless of race, colour or religion. 

This cannot happen as long as ignorance remains like a malignant tumor within mankind.

Don’t be dumb. The more you believe Western Propaganda the more you become a victim of mass hypnosis of an otherwise passive world community. Make your own decision, but don’t be blinded by patriotism in such a way that you cannot see the truth… and even if you don’t want to accept the truth, don’t be stupid enough to remain convinced by lies.

Comments

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

Listen Live

Recent Comments

Cris,

the point that rational people make is that the stuff coming from the airplane exhaust stays indeed the same, but what’s changing is the situation around the plane. At one day there is dry air, at annother there is a lot of humidity. (See my explanation how the latter can happen when a front is approaching.)

If a contrail persists and grows, the additional mass comes from the humidity that is already present in the air - just like when natural clouds form, seemingly out of nothing.

By the way, that is a well-known plausibility argument against chemtrails - no plane is able to carry the mass equivalent of even a small persistant trail (search “ice budget”).

By Josh on 2014 10 31 - 23:46:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Andrew Adams,

I don’t claim to be an expert. However, I have read a lot about both chemtrail claims and their dissection from a scientic point of view, from sources that are accessible to everyone.

If something specific that I wrote is wrong, I certainly welcome a correction. Usually, I’m giving references from actual experts, so it’s only fair that any rebuttal should include specific references too. Also, I’d welcome if we could stay polite.

The science of persistent contrails is well established. They were observed since the early days of aviation (see also the top article), and the conditions that favour them were researched in the middle of the 20th century (Schmidt and Appleman, see for instance the introduction of this paper).

The Appleman Chart is a rule of thumb for contrail prediction. It is not very intuitive, but there is a visualization available which allows to adjust the parameters and see how the contrail properties are changing (needs Java).

Any claim that a specific persistent contrail cannot be explained with this knowledge needs to be based on very good evidence. If the evidence is reviewed and still stands, science has to be corrected. That’s the whole idea about scientific research - but the burden of proof lies with the person who makes the claim.

By Josh on 2014 10 31 - 22:38:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

It amazes me how rational people can think that the same stuff coming out the back of a plane can one day increase to enormous size and exhibit strange transformations(usually when rain is forecast) and other days is either non existent or merely dissipates from visibility within a minute.

By Cris on 2014 10 31 - 21:51:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

“i have been neither dictatorial, nor abusive” - yes, you have mate. Earlier you said “how about just taking a big gulp from the mug of STFU”. That is both dictatorial and abusive. We’ll now add “dishonest” to the list of your shortcomings. Have a nice day.

By Hereward Fenton on 2014 10 31 - 21:01:25
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Moderate Muslims:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=253_1412566275

By Eugene Donnini on 2014 10 31 - 20:28:52
From the entry 'A review of violence and intolerance in Islamic and other societies'.

fenton, i didnt say i didnt want to engage in rational debate, i said i wasnt interested in engaging with an obviously mendacious shill. i have been neither dictatorial, nor abusive, and as far as failure to prove anything goes, ignoring evidence does not mean evidence has not been provided, nor proof been established.

you have certainly not proven by any stretch of the imagination, that chemtrails are imaginary, and the concern of thousands of credible experts worldwide is without justification.

may i suggest if you can not prove what you are asserting, that you also take a hearty sip yourself. have a shitty day.

By Andrew Adams on 2014 10 31 - 15:33:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

The onus of proof is on those promoting geoengineering (David Keith, etc.Ken Caldera) to prove that what they say about the spraying, i.e. that it is a proposal, not a global reality, is true. That follows from the precautionary principle.

By W, Hall on 2014 10 31 - 15:10:14
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

As admin of this site I feel I need to step in here. Andrew, if you do not not want to engage in discussion and debate that’s fine, however you have absolutely no right to tell anybody to “STFU”.

I have provided a comment section to encourage free discussion and debate. Your dictatorial and abusive tone merely demonstrates your failure to prove anything.

Since you don’t want to engage in rational debate may I suggest that you refrain from posting here?

Have a nice day!

By Hereward Fenton on 2014 10 31 - 14:52:32
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

@ lumpen josh
what part of “I have no interest in hearing anything else you have to say, ” is too hard for you to understand?
I do not have to justify anything to you, i dont have to point you to anything, i dont have to engage you in any sort of conversation here because you have proven yourself to be of no credibility, a nonsensical bore.

nothing you can say can prove that chemtrails are a figment of the imagination of highly qualified credible people worldwide, so how about just taking a big gulp from the mug of STFU and stop pretending you are some sort of authoritive arbiter on anything.

By Andrew Adams on 2014 10 31 - 14:08:25
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

First off i applaud you for seeking facts rather that resorting to slander as i have all too commonly seen among alternate media. On that note i would like to make known some experiments the Australian government was carrying out! My grandfather was an aircraft maintenance technician many years ago. He obsessively tells me of an experiment they carried out where dry ice was shoveled into a modified chute into the clouds. He claimed they were at the aircraft altitude ceiling and the dry ice would cause the clouds to drop their water. He claimed they were wearing oxygen masks to breathe!

By Stephen on 2014 10 29 - 14:39:09
From the entry 'Chemtrails brownshirts renew threats against TNRA'.

Categories