Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA

911: The side they’ll never print

26 May 2011 | Permalink | comments: 0

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Amina Youssef | 18 March 2011

http://amaarantine.tumblr.com/post/3920160056/911-the-side-theyll-never-print

The events of September 11, 2011 were a catastrophe that shook the global population by its roots. An inhumane act largely unprecedented in the modern world was unleashed onto society causing a wave of fear and ‘terror’ that would significantly effect the years to come. Islamaphobia increased, racial hate became more prevalent, and the world turned a blind eye to the incoming or rather, ongoing suffering of Arabs and Afghans in the occupied regions of the Middle East. This is not to suggest that thoughts which did not exist were aroused on that day. Undoubtedly there was a seed, a fear of the unknown, that lay dormant and was awoken through nourishment provided by western propaganda. 

Prejudice and racial discrimination against Muslims was solidified due to the blame that was placed on an isolated minority of “Radical and fundamentalist Muslims”. ‘Terrorists’, a picture of the fallen towers, and the word ‘Muslim’ occupied every front paper on the Globe. Since it was they themselves who claimed to be brothers and sisters regardless of blood lines, it could only be said then that all were either directly or indirectly a terrorist by association.  This ‘Terrorist’ label was applied on Muslims before any tangible proof or thorough investigation could be undertaken. This became a significant problem especially since the American Government to the current day fails to outline any transparency of processes or tangible information to affirm that it was ‘Allah’s advocates’ who undertook this act of inhumanity. 

This is not to suggest that I am not in sympathy with those who suffered on that frightful day. On the contrary, I write this in order to allow victims of September 11 to have the rightful perpetrators of extreme violence to be put to trial so that it may possible to retain any justice left in the world. Any of you who have watched raw videos or heard audio recordings of the day can agree with me that the event was a tragedy. For those of you who do not agree, then perhaps you are on the wrong page. 

We all listened to the desperate voices calling out through telephone lines for someone to save them. We all witnessed the tears falling of those who were forced to recount the last words of their trapped loved ones. We all heard of the people who leaped from windows out of sheer desperation to be liberated from the internal and physical battle of slowly oncoming death. No human should be trapped in such a way that forces one to die a thousand times before the end finally comes. 

Undoubtedly, the people who planned and carried out the lethal acts were terrorists of the worst kind. Their emotional indifference to their human counter parts and the suffering that it would cause really strikes hard at the reasonable mind. This attack was not only one on people on that day and in that building. Their hijacking of the buildings tore through the human psyche of the Western population. It ravaged through centuries of peaceful streets and buildings that Islam had built through it’s beauty and tolerance. It tore apart hearts everywhere and hardened them creating a barrier between Islam and the non Muslim entities of the world.

George Bush accompanied by Western Media declared that the attacks were planned and executed by non other than the American trained Muslim terrorist Osama Bin Laden and his followers.

I was 11 years old at the time when the twin towers hit the buildings. I was ready to accept that Osama Bin Laden had convinced his little radical sheep to hijack planes in order to kill Non-Muslims (and Muslims alike). But I am no longer young, naiive and stupid. 

The evidence presented to us now conflicts with what Americans declared happened on that day. For example, 911truth.org is a group of officials such as Architects, lawyers, firefighters etc who came together demanding truth and transparency regarding the terrible events that left thousands of people dead. They have publicly spoken about the fallacies of what the Government dignitaries have supported. How is it that the tower fell down in such perfect vertical alignment? Why was there a series of explosions going off in the various levels of the building BELOW where the plane hit? How did the vehicles containing the explosives even get in through WTC security? And most importantly how did the passport of the supposed ‘Muslim’ hijacker be discovered in the debris and rubble during the aftermath yet the black boxes which are meant to be virtually indestructible be gone beyond repair? What lunacy! If you are ready to believe that a passport survived from the top of a high rise burning building to the bottom then I suggest to you that you are of poor mind. 

Whoever orchestrated these attacks needs to be brought to justice. The effects of the terrorist attacks on September 11 did not end on that day. These criminals have caused over one Million deaths of Iraqis, Afghanis, and foreign soldiers including Americans and Australians in the Middle East due to Bush’s atrocious and ill made “War on Terror”. 

They have created a rift between Muslims and Non-Muslims, and stamped an irreversible scar on the families of the 911 victims. Non-Muslim psyche’s were hit and charged with fury and hate. How very convenient since now most of the Western World feels a great sense of indifference to the suffering, pain and increasing death of Muslims in the Middle East by unwelcome occupiers and terrorists such as Israel. 

If this veil that has blinded them after 911 which Western Media was the direct instigator of could be removed they would be able to see the atrocities and war crimes that Israel incites on the West Bank and East Jerusalem on a daily basis. They would no longer see the death of the Arab and Afghan children in the middle east as collateral damage. 

Let the truth be exposed so that the world can work together to allow the future to be decorated with light and togetherness. Peace and tolerance can be promoted through the existence of truth and criminal accountability that can be placed on an individual regardless of race, colour or religion. 

This cannot happen as long as ignorance remains like a malignant tumor within mankind.

Don’t be dumb. The more you believe Western Propaganda the more you become a victim of mass hypnosis of an otherwise passive world community. Make your own decision, but don’t be blinded by patriotism in such a way that you cannot see the truth… and even if you don’t want to accept the truth, don’t be stupid enough to remain convinced by lies.

Comments

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

Listen Live

Recent Comments

Geoffrey, I’m inclined to agree with what you say, except that I wasn’t saying ‘anything goes’. I was only pointing out what free speech is, and that it isn’t what most people who like to think of themselves as liberal (or whatever) want it to be. They like to think they are open-minded and progressive, yet they support the assertion of authority over others.

If anyone can dictate what I cannot speak about, that sets a precedent. It means that no-one has freedom of speech at all. I don’t want to say nasty things about gays, for example, but if I support the idea of some body being able to stop others doing that, it would be hypocritical to then oppose that same body imposing other similarly arbitrary limitations on me.

Thus I am opposed to any limitations on speech (that is free speech!). It doesn’t mean I approve of any particular thing someone might say, but I do uphold their right to say it.

By zek on 2015 01 31 - 03:30:57
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

Free speech of course is free speech, as ‘Zek’ opines.  He is saying that ‘anything goes’.

On the other hand, some ‘anti-discrimination laws’ particularly in NSW Australia, make it unlawful to make any public statement that is deemed to offend persons who are, or who are reasonably believed to be, homosexual.  This anti-free speech law was bought into existence by Ms Clover Moore and it was called the Anti-Discriminaiton (Homosexual Vilification) Amendment Act 1993. Read more about the nightmare this law can create, here: http://bernardgaynor.com.au/into-battle-backup-required/#comment-384568

This show by Hereward Fenton I found very mind-stretching and interesting.  It was as if he was taking us on an inquiry together in order to discover a deeper truth.  It discussed many aspects of free speech in the current climate of fear and loathing. There are several dictionary definintions of ‘paradox’.  Here’s one definition that I think Mr Fenton had in mind:- ‘a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth’.

We can also say free speech is not free speech, in that most of us (except trolls) self-censor.  Our empathy, if we have any, stops our speech from being free.  This raises the question, what do we do about those without empathy, who are psychopaths or trolls, and actually get pleasure from using speech to attack and hurt people. In order to avoid laws that try to control what people can and cannot publicly say, one solution is to change our attitude, and cultivate tolerance and resiliance. This is based on the insight that mothers used to tell their kids who were bullied at school.

Sticks and stones
will break your bones
but words will never hurt you.

This little ditty reresents the opposite of what the vilification laws are about.

By Geoffrey McKee on 2015 01 31 - 00:52:48
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

I think the search for answers is pretty obvious now Fenton, it seems most avenues end up in the same place so for you and your followers, I think you are doing a great job, but its time to expose the elephant in the living room, once 9-11, is sorted and the world wars, its pretty much a Rothschild & Israhelli terrorist state purpetrating (ALL) the worlds angst! Imagine no refugees because no wars, MM its like that cure the scource, Breddon O,connell (SPOT ON) mate. Lets support people like this who see the Truth. Here,s to a better world smile Bring it on !

By Lachlan on 2015 01 29 - 20:47:17
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Sorry guys, “homophobes” in my last post should have read islamophobes…sometimes my finger get a little ahead of my thinking!

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 01 29 - 16:56:08
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

josh anonymous thinks his banal obfuscations can dispel any and all concerns regarding atmospheric spraying.
you may believe your bullshit bluff and bluster - but it does nothing to prove your case of no such thing as chemtrails, when that picture is but one of hundreds you will see if you enter chemtrail satellite into a search engine..

you can explain all them away with your unqualified babble - fact is.. if trails require specific rare conditions in oreder to persist, even for a short while.. ie; a few minutes, that doesnt go anywhere near explaining what is shown covering an entire country..  your full of it..  unless you can post evidence of your claim, that there is no such thing as chemtrails, i dont care for anything you have to say, you have proven repeatedly your disposition towards mendacity..

so again.. to put it bluntly.. put up or STFU.

By theehwh on 2015 01 29 - 14:53:44
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

aewt/Andrew Adams/Skywatcher,

the image you posted was taken from this original NASA publication.

Note that it’s an enhanced infrared image, but nevertheless it was a day with many trails in that region (January 29, 2004).

Here is the whole satellite photo (thumbnail) in real color, which provides some perspective about the proportions. Note the cloud band over Florida with the embedded contrails:

The original high-res image (17 MB) is also still available here.


Again, “rare” is a relative term; the actual numbers and the context are more telling.
As the study of R. Sausen and others says (I have referenced it before):

The annual global mean value is 0.09%

(From “A Diagnostic Study of the Global Distribution of Contrails Part I: Present Day Climate”)

Now, the surface area of the Earth is 510 million square kilometers. That means roughly 460 000 square kilometers of pure contrail area - at every moment, excluding all the gaps, and obviously concentrated in areas where there is air traffic.

The central point is that this is the average, so of course there can be local and temporal maxima. Nothing there to make scientists fret about.

By Josh on 2015 01 29 - 01:41:43
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

it appears from this picture

that the specific, RARE, ( i say rare because that is what was said in an article posted by josh anonymous himself ) atmospheric conditions for contrails to persist… actually must in reality, occur all over the world, all the bloody time!

josh and fenton are liars. simple as that.

By aewt on 2015 01 28 - 13:12:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

At least Christendom has modified its act…even the Pope calls for peace and reconciliation, admited the Churches complicity in past atrocities, apologized to the Jews and so on…

re free speech: I suppose Hereward needs to be very careful about what he says, and would be fully aware that his every word is being monitored by others. I think he does a great job and has on more than one occasion come very close to the edge. He’s also entitled to his opinion, and although I don’t agree with it at times, in my opinion, it doesn’t detract from the work he is doing.

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 01 28 - 10:51:17
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

Free speech is free speech. If you believe in any restrictions on it, then you don’t believe in FREE speech. People often say, “I’m all for free speech but…” - there are no buts, it’s either free or it isn’t. Be honest, if you don’t believe in free speech, admit it. I’m not advocating either side of the argument here, just pointing out a fact.

By Zek on 2015 01 28 - 04:26:08
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

Rattus, do you know about the military conquests of Christian nations, from the crusades through to the conquest of Mexico? Do you know about how the ‘Christian’ slave traders operated in Africa? Do you know what the ‘Christian’ French did in Indochina, or the ‘Christian’ English did in India, or the ‘Christian’ Dutch did in Indonesia?

I think maybe your education in these matters is a bit one-sided, in that you have read and absorbed only one polemical perspective and missed the forest for the trees.

If you’re looking for atrocities, look no further than Christendom.

As for the Charlie Hebdo cover, surely you understand that the headline is the main message conveyed? The headline says “The Koran is Shit” - a direct insult to Muslims. Imagine if a magazine had the headline “The Torah is Shit” - how long do you think such a publication would remain in circulation?

By Hereward Fenton on 2015 01 27 - 22:40:05
From the entry 'The free speech paradox'.

Categories