9/11 was an inside job
Tonight I am joined by Josh Jackson as we go through some of the 9/11 anniversary news for the week. In particular we look at the new BBC hit-piece 9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip, which is looking more and more like an attempt to brainwash a group of young people into accepting the official 9/11 story. This production features Charlie Veitch who famously did an about turn on the subject after the filming of this show.
Here is a snippet from the BBC's own description:
Andrew Maxwell, a comedian, believes in the findings of the official investigation, which claim the responsibility for the attack lies with Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. He thinks the conspiracies theories are unsubstantiated nonsense. So in this film he offers to take five young Brits, who believe some of these conspiracy theories, on a road-trip from New York to Washington. They visit Ground Zero where two planes hit the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, home of vast American defence HQ and Shanksville in Pennsylvania where United 93 crashed.
We also take look at Triple J's lame attempt to discredit 9/11 truthers, which dishonestly claims to be "exploring alternative viewpoints".
In the final segment we play a short snippet from John Bursill's recent debate of 9/11 questions on Sydney's 2GB radio.
Comments
Some 1500 architects, engineers and other disciplines are calling for a neutral public enquiry into 9/11 as well as alternative media world wide yet the mainstream media blink out.... it must then be an agenda to cover-up!
A book by Judy Woods titled "Where Did The Towers Go?" offers a scientific evaluation of 9/11. Woods holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering, a B.S. in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics) and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science. This book is not about speculation or theories it is a nuts and bolts scientific evaluation of the collapse of the buildings noted as 9/11.
Unfortunately our lame duck powered talking heads consider their pay packets far more important than their moral obligation to report facts.
I cringe when these same powder puff heads moralise to the mob.... double think at it's purest!..... GJC
By Garth Crabb on 2011 09 10
Now go away Garth!
By Hereward Fenton on 2011 09 10
You can crap on all you like but i'm out..... GJC
By Garth Crabb on 2011 09 10
By crazz on 2011 09 10
By Hereward Fenton on 2011 09 11
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/kac8f/richard_andrew_grove_is_a_credible_whistleblower/
By Plato on 2011 09 11
And I would not hear this discuss yet at any American underground radio station. On Judy Wood, the observations she made are very well done; She compared 9/11 to Hiroshima. But she is not smart enough to conclude that 9/11 was a nuclear job, because she was womanized by this Hutchinson play-boy with is unrepeatable laboratory conclusions.
Any case, the nuclear truth is best explained by Dimitri Khazelov.
That's real science. To get familiar with his explanation of the technology used by the (nuclear) controlled demolition experts, there is a documentary made on it, that currently has a link over here:
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675-20.html
Or you can download the video presentation over here:
http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/Download.htm
He also published a book, that you can order.
Most important argument for 9/11 being a nuclear job, is the fact that the words "ground zero" was only used to address a terrain after a nuclear explosion. This argument is some what explained by American researchers who came to the same conclusion as mister Khalezov independent:
http://www.reformation.org/ground-zero.html
I apologize for the inconvenience, but it's the truth folks.
And when researching for finding out, I would find the observations of Dr. Judy Wood useful. All she observed supports a nuclear demolition. I also am of the opinion, that Dr. Wood is rather charming. And being so weak as to base false conclusions on further sound empiric observations, are to be understood as being a weak woman, that at a certain point has a hard time choosing between the person or his work. Weak as woman are, we should be able to forgive. She has done a great job.
By Bosgeus on 2011 10 19
He has done a mountain of work avoiding the truth.
That being what is written in our law.
He will mention every topic except the biggest world shaping event of modern history
The Protestant Revolution.
Why?
Why pretend to care about 911 when the perpetrators were members of the Knights of Malta. Arguably controlled by the Jesuits, but inarguably owing loyalty to the pope by oath.
He will hear any opinion you can think of but mine.
Why?
By Dave on 2011 10 24