A new PM, a new world order

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of June 30, 2010. Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

30 June 2010 | Permalink | comments: 9

Share |

Categories: [ ]

We lead tonight with revelations that Julia Gillard's partner, Tim Mathieson, works for leading Israel lobbyist Albert Dadon.

We also cover several breaking stories in relation to the police crackdown at the G20 summit in Toronto plus a selection of news stories from our twitter stream, all with customary TNRA chutzpah.

In the second half our planned guest interview did not take place and we do apologise if tonight's show is somewhat haphazard as a result.

We plan to get some high quality interviews on the show soon!

G20 Toronto Collected Scenes of Police Brutality

Related Links

Gillard stands by partner over Israel job link

Prime Minister Julia Gillard says she wants Australia to have a carbon tax and is prepared to fight for it

G20 Toronto Black Block get green light to rampage?

Toronto G20: Police admit no five-metre rule existed on security fence law

"Nonjudicial foreclosure" - the latest step in America's descent into Dickensian injustice and moral squalour

Third US carrier, 4,000 Marines augment US armada opposite Iran

Facebook removes "Boycott BP" group with close to 800,000 fans

BP and the axis of evil | Adam Curtis

Health Ministry Finds that Fluoridation Does Not Reduce Tooth Decay - Dental Health Magazine

Obama internet 'kill switch' bill approved

More climate madness: inventor wants to paint mountains white in order to make glaciers grow

Comments

You are doing good work Hereward. I am proud to have been associated with you in the early years of 2006 when we were all alone out there. I see you are now realising how much of a stranglehold the Israelis have on foreign countries and if we dont stop it we are all screwed.

By Jake McCrann on 2010 07 03 - 10:44:48

The project is called Diaspora. “The privacy aware, personally controlled, do-it-all, open source social network.”

By Calem on 2010 07 06 - 14:39:19

http://www.joindiaspora.com/2010/07/01/one-month-in.html

By Calem on 2010 07 06 - 14:41:27

Frightenning statements from Gillard! Encouraging another push from Global Warmist Aussie Supremo Connor! What guiles me is that again we cannot rely on any mainstream media reports that will look into ‘the other side’ of any issue other than which the ‘Government’ feeds them. Journalists? My arse What about Climategate, Freedom Flotilla raids, Gaza and US use of torture…let alone 911!! If ever this Country needed a NEW political party, it is NOW!!

By angry dave on 2010 07 06 - 20:31:09

I’m serious! How about the Australian Truth Party!! Every Policy decision based on truth and no ‘spin’ - Couldn’t go wrong!

By angry dave on 2010 07 06 - 20:36:18

I totally agree Angry Dave… I’d support the Aussie truth Party… For sure…

By Daniel A on 2010 07 16 - 06:23:24

By Lane Cairns on 2010 12 07 - 19:46:45

So he’s not just a “beard”. This goes to show how stupid they think is the Australian are. Come on! Her partner works for an Israeli lobbyist and we’re supposed to think it’s OK because she says so?

By Tony on 2011 06 01 - 07:37:55

Claiming that we would be defeated in an all out war against the State on a global level is incorrect. We outnumber these globalist thugs by millions to one, of course millions would die but they would eventually succumb to the will of the people as long as they were organised.
Not that I advocate violence, I’m merely speaking hypothetically.
Why haven’t they moved in on the US population before attempting to disarm them ? They know that it would descend to a guerrilla war and they know that you can’t win such a war against the people.

By Tony on 2011 06 01 - 08:42:51

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.

1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?

If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.