Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA

A new PM, a new world order

June 30, 2010, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

30 June 2010 | Permalink | comments: 9

Categories: [ ]

We lead tonight with revelations that Julia Gillard's partner, Tim Mathieson, works for leading Israel lobbyist Albert Dadon.

We also cover several breaking stories in relation to the police crackdown at the G20 summit in Toronto plus a selection of news stories from our twitter stream, all with customary TNRA chutzpah.

In the second half our planned guest interview did not take place and we do apologise if tonight's show is somewhat haphazard as a result.

We plan to get some high quality interviews on the show soon!

G20 Toronto Collected Scenes of Police Brutality



Related Links

Comments

You are doing good work Hereward. I am proud to have been associated with you in the early years of 2006 when we were all alone out there. <br><br>I see you are now realising how much of a stranglehold the Israelis have on foreign countries and if we dont stop it we are all screwed.

By Jake McCrann on 2010 07 03 - 10:44:48

The project is called Diaspora.<br><br>“The privacy aware, personally controlled, do-it-all, open source social network.”

By Calem on 2010 07 06 - 14:39:19

http://www.joindiaspora.com/2010/07/01/one-month-in.html

By Calem on 2010 07 06 - 14:41:27

Frightenning statements from Gillard!<br>Encouraging another push from Global Warmist Aussie Supremo Connor!<br>What guiles me is that again we cannot rely on any mainstream media reports that will look into ‘the other side’ of any issue other than which the ‘Government’ feeds them. Journalists? My arse<br>What about Climategate, Freedom Flotilla raids, Gaza and US use of torture…let alone 911!!<br>If ever this Country needed a NEW political party, it is NOW!!

By angry dave on 2010 07 06 - 20:31:09

I’m serious! How about the Australian Truth Party!! <br>Every Policy decision based on truth and no ‘spin’ - Couldn’t go wrong!

By angry dave on 2010 07 06 - 20:36:18

I totally agree Angry Dave… I’d support the Aussie truth Party… For sure…

By Daniel A on 2010 07 16 - 06:23:24

[have you thought|but what] about the [kids|children] - they are [definately|really] [whats most important|whats important|what matters] [in this situation|here]

By Lane Cairns on 2010 12 07 - 20:46:45

So he’s not just a “beard”. This goes to show how stupid they think is the Australian are. Come on! Her partner works for an Israeli lobbyist and we’re supposed to think it’s OK because she says so?

By Tony on 2011 06 01 - 07:37:55

Claiming that we would be defeated in an all out war against the State on a global level is incorrect. We outnumber these globalist thugs by millions to one, of course millions would die but they would eventually succumb to the will of the people as long as they were organised.
Not that I advocate violence, I’m merely speaking hypothetically.
Why haven’t they moved in on the US population before attempting to disarm them ?  They know that it would descend to a guerrilla war and they know that you can’t win such a war against the people.

By Tony on 2011 06 01 - 08:42:51

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Listen Live

Recent Comments

OZ-Surprise!!!

By Solaris on 2014 12 19 - 13:59:22
From the entry 'The virtue of selfishness'.

dickhead josh… you seem to be in a very verbose mood..
how many planes hit the pentagon?

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 19 - 09:40:44
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

OZ-surprise!!!

By Solarisquartz on 2014 12 19 - 09:25:34
From the entry 'Top 10 Crimes Against Truth 2013'.

OZ-surprise!!!

By Solarisquartz on 2014 12 19 - 09:25:33
From the entry 'Top 10 Crimes Against Truth 2013'.

OZ-surprise!!!

By Solarisquartz on 2014 12 19 - 09:25:30
From the entry 'Top 10 Crimes Against Truth 2013'.

Leonard Clampett is correct if he states that airway charts are no direct indication of actual traffic.

However it shows that there are designated routes over South Burnett. It’s not an area where air traffic is unusual.

For the actual traffic consult Flightradar 24 over the South Burnett region.

Regarding the semantics of “from/to Sydney and Brisbane” let me clearly state that I never had the route between Sydney and Brisbane in mind. This might have been more clear to people following the discussion with Cris.

The bottom line and the relevant point is that there is just no evidence for days with “only one jet” over South Burnett. Flight tracking shows clearly that there is constant traffic over the region. Show me a day with only five jets over South Burnett on Flightradar 24 - even limited to the daylight period - and I will be convinced.

The statement of Cris (“We are lucky to get 1 jet a day visible here normally”) can indeed only refer to the visibility with bare eyes on a non-trail day, not the actual traffic, as explained extensively and repeatedly.

Regarding the “3 or more abreast” situation that Cris referred to, I quote my reply from the first time this was brought up:

Next time you see three planes abreast, or circles, or grids - grab a camera and take a picture. Otherwise it’s hard to say what you saw. May have been normal traffic where the many routes are bound to intersect at some points, or circling in holding positions, or military exercises.

Without seeing pictures, it’s just speculation.

I can add now that I have observed several situations on Flightradar where three planes were close together (vertically separated of course), going in the same direction. Why should that be unusual?

 

By Josh on 2014 12 19 - 01:13:29
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Surprise!!!

By Solarisquartz on 2014 12 18 - 14:36:34
From the entry 'Twilight of Freedom'.

chris

By the way I I still don’t have an answer for when there are 3 or more abreast?????

you dont get answers from josh anonymous.. its beyond his capabilities, you will get a whole heap of incomprehensible bluff and bluster though..

i usually try to make it easy for the poor sap, just asking simple yes or no questions, or those requiring a one word answer..  but they seem to be the ones he struggles with the most? - he really is an enigma.. he should donate his body to science, and i dont think he should wait till he dies either..

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 18 - 12:45:51
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard

This means aircraft from/to Sydney and Brisbane. There is no mention of any other geographical locations so it is demonstrable that you refer to those two cities.

he must really struggle with simple day to day tasks.. honestly.. that is another example of when he accussed me of making threats, then denied he wrote that, then wanted me to show him precisely where he did, and when shown, simply ignores all reference to it..  pretends it didnt happen at all.. unbelievable really - if he is the best answer to prove that chemtrails dont exist, they really are struggling.. 

he thinks proving a point, obviously, is simply banging away at the keyboard and hitting submit, with no consideration to rhyme or reason.. relevence, consistency, logic or common sense.

he wont / cant even answer simple questions.. incapable of providing a yes or no answer to a simple question. he feels his inconsistencies, lies, qualifications, credibility, have no relevence to anything so long as he keeps the babble going on and on.. he is doing a good job.

I suspect Janonymous is a whack-job rather than a shill.

you might be right there, it would be almost impossible for a shill to pretend to be so stupid.. and in most instances, id feel a little bit of pity..  but i dont in this case, he needs medication or something, he is obviously in a lot of misery..

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 18 - 12:42:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Pretty busy here.
Looked at the link late last night.
If there were planes on those routes I would have seen very few as nearly all of the routes don’t come close enough to me.
Maximus, you are not omniscient.
You are clueless.
By the way I I still don’t have an answer for when there are 3 or more abreast?????
What about the ones that intersect those paths….only a few of which go near me?????
What about the stop start ones?
And the ones that make curvy border around an approaching weather front?
Or the giant circle that I took photos of?
Just because the lap dog news can pump out NWO propaganda unopposed because they won’t print evidence to the contrary doesn’t mean you will get away with it.
Do you need hearing aids?
VERY FEW JETS UP HERE UNLESS THERE IS IMMANENT RAIN!!!

By Cris on 2014 12 18 - 12:30:48
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Categories