LATEST SHOW
Update on Assange, Bitcoin and abortion law
Get the podcast »
Australia’s historical fertility rate
Categories: [ ]
"The ageing of the population is caused by two factors. Firstly, Australian families are, on average, having fewer children. Birth rates started declining in the late 1960s, and have been falling ever since (Chart A1). For the last 20 years or so the birth rate has fallen below the replacement rate — meaning that without migration Australia’s population would eventually begin to fall."
http://demographics.treasury.gov.au/.../adc-04.asp
Recent Comments
RECLAIM AUSTRALIA IS DOOMED
Although I agree with many of their ideas, the forces reigned against RAM are too great, violent, statist and reactionary for them to remain a non-political, broad based, multi-ethnic, community protest group for much longer. The Left and their Antifa nihilist fellow travelers are already pushing them towards the extreme Right, by calling them racists and Islamophobes and so on. Whilst the extreme Right have aligned themselves with RAM. With fascists of the Left and Right pressuring them they will not be able to remain beyond the Left-Right divide and will inevitably move to the Right - the extreme Right. Which is already happening. A development which will alienate decent Australians of all ethnic backgrounds many of whom currently support them.
The RAM leadership have already established open alliances with the Patriotic Front (the ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration) Australia First and Golden Dawn, a Greek neo-Nazi party. Members of these collectivist groups are currently attending RAM demonstrations all over Australia.
There is a real need in Australia to establish a political movement beyond the Left-Right divide and their vested interests, a movement that questions the current direction Australia is heading i.e. the direction the Left/Right and their extremes would like to take it; that questions the efficacy of state sponsored multiculturalism, as opposed to a proper, non-discriminatory immigration policy; that questions the validity of political correctness; that is politically neutral, anti-war and pro environment; that is opposed to all collectivists ideologies (fascisms of the Left and Right); that would dismantle the power pyramids of corporations and banks and their ability to impact on government; that would dissolve all anti-terror laws and all laws that impose on the rights and freedom of the individual and the people.
(The ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration)
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reclaim-australia-rally-set-for-sydney-on-sunday-20150718-gifb9s.html
http://australiafirstparty.net/news/reclaiming-australia-queensland-senate-campaign/
By Eugene Donnini on 2015 07 26 - 15:36:56
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.
Hello there I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don韙 have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.
By Prova a Adidas Neutro Originals Nizza Nero Giallo on 2015 07 20 - 08:41:30
From the entry 'Statism, the greater good and the big lie'.
I second Keith’s assertion that Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He bangs on about Halaal being a scam and money maker for Islam (and no I don’t support Halaal whatsoever), but makes excuses for its counterpart Kosher as being a somehow legitimate. Double standards? When I confronted him about this fact he went off on a convoluted tirade about Israel being some sort of “Bastion of Democracy” in the middle east…Really!, I will leave that one up to the readers to decide on. I found that MH came across as disingenuous to say the least.
By Citizen Scorn on 2015 07 19 - 07:33:43
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.
Without doubt, TNR is one of the best, if not the best alternative news source on the net. Which doesn’t mean Herewood is always right. His job, I believe, is to present the facts as he sees them as an objectively as possible, without fear or favor. For this, he has my respect and support. But I believe he needs to be careful and to think a little deeper about the problems of “racism,” in Australia. He has labelled the Reclaim Australia Movement as racist. I’m wondering if his objectivity is a little weak on this point, a little without foundation.
Of course all political movements have its fringe groups and individuals. We make a distinction between, for example, a Muslim and a fundamentalist Muslim (Islamist), and by so doing we don’t claim that all Muslims are blood thirsty fanatics. If its good for the Muslims, then its good for RAM, which is bound to attract a few lunatics and real racists. But to brand the entire movement as “racist” is wrong; it is the same ploy that is used by the mainstream media and its left-wing, establishment Marxist boot boys.
One of the first things I noticed when i attended a RAM rally recently were the amount of non-white people in attendance, including Aboriginals. In fact the main banner of RAM contains an Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag. Speakers at their rallies have included Jews, Arabs, Indians, Aboriginals, Chinese and so on. What does this tell you? Is this really a fascist-Nazi-racist movement whose stated aim are the eradication and exclusion of other cultures, in place of some sort of Aussie white Reich, or is this just propaganda that is being propagated by the left for their own political interests. Consequently, we all know where the culmination of their politics have led, historically speaking, which are to the imposition of terror and dictatorships.
We can be thankful for small mercies, in terms of the Left, which today mostly tends to attract collectivists, establishmentarians and the privileged sons and daughters of the upper bourgeoisie, who seems to share one thing in common, nativity….
By Eugene on 2015 07 18 - 16:03:54
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.
Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He hasn’t even been citizen for but a few years. But, he makes out like he was born there. ALSO - this guy spent 30 years in Thailand working shady businesses. I would wager that his primary purpose in being an activist is that he wants to make money off selling merchandise.
By Keith on 2015 07 17 - 20:51:15
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.
good to see you putting out some new shows heraward
freely the banana girl is to a certain extent a troll, as is her boyfriend durian rider. they have been trolling the fitness community on youtube for some time… and yes they are extreme but they are also trolls. They use their trolling to spread their message. currently, another dude called vegangains is trolling the fitness community as well.
i am a vegetarian, and it was seeing this documentary on the pork industry that started me on the vegetarian path. for anyone interested, its pretty off the charts disturbing and its australian as well. its pretty much made by dudes breaking into pork farms and filming what they find
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KArL5YjaL5U
Would the world be better if people cared where their food came from? probably, they might then care about other things too
do you become a better person if you dont eat meat? i feel like a better person mainly because animals aren’t being hurt because of me. i dont feel humans have to eat meat really… or at least not much. How can you watch that documentary on pork, know that that is pretty much whats going on and turn a blind eye to it? I think its basic empathy and just saying well ‘i like bacon so yeah’ is in my opinion wrong and i can see freleys point of view to an extent. In my opinion, at least these people believe in something. i see my money as my vote, henceforth im ethical as to what i do with it. free range eggs became mainstream for exactly this reason… although im pretty sure woolies and coles lobbied the state to change the definition of the word ‘free range’ at some point. I dont eat beef because the amount of resources that go into growing a cow are pretty crazy. Think about how much grass that cow needs to eat before it is harvested and how much space it requires. think of how many vegies you could grow in the same space with the same amount of water. lamb? comon, think about what your doing here… but that being said i think most vegans are total loons. People like freeley should be advocating for the destruction of lions and tigers, as lions and tigers murder other animals in truly horrific style. if we humans are smart enough to not harm animals, then we should be stopping the animals that harm other animals from existing. Freeley also kills birds when she flies in aeroplanes so she is a hypocrite.
feminism is one of the biggest problems in society today and although there is some valid historical basis to it, the liberation of the human female from their biology is in my opinion largely a product of the technological advance of humans. sufferagettes where never machine gunned on the streets, unlike the men that where drafted and sent off to war to die just a few years earlier. as technology has advanced, women have advanced as well, however now its going way too far and is pretty blatantly anti male in many respects. i view feminism in its modern context as a tool of the social marxists that really isnt doing society a great deal of good at this time. its screwing up gender dynamics and is wrecking women and men for each other. i see it as low frequency, lowest common denominator idiocy, just like a lot of the the race baiting ‘is this racist’ stuff getting around that is being perpetuated pretty much as a distraction, divide and conquer strategy by the power elite. idiots love this kind of bicker and beef… it would be funny if it wasn’t so serious
anyway
I agree with steven friar. gods a maniac
good show… keep making them
By r0Kb3B0p on 2015 07 14 - 21:05:32
From the entry 'Addictions, obsessions, fanaticisms and distractions'.
Really truthfull.
By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:56:36
From the entry 'Defending your personal health choices'.
Yeah sure authority aware.
By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:28:55
From the entry 'What is the future of Australia?'.
Stay tuned for more rules here as usually is the case!!!
By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:21:50
From the entry 'Mass media disinformation and brainwashing dissected'.
Almost two months since the last broadcast! How the hell can you expect people to donate when you don’t broadcast? Looks like the ship of truth has sprung a leak. This broadcast has been part of my life almost since its inception…it is one of the few alternative news sources that hasn’t gone off the deep end, by dilution credible information with crap e.g. Fairdinkum Radio and Info Wars…Pittard started FR with some incredibly interesting material, but then he flipped…Today he sounds like a fundamentalist preacher, the Christian equivalent to a Fanatical Islamist. As an atheist, I think he’s really ###### up a potentially good show. As for Info Wars, all they would have to do to improve is dump Alex Jones, what a shit-for-brains. I reckon Jones and Pittard are allowed to proliferate, because they’re so stupid and harmless. I suppose they have some entertainment value, and along with David Icke are living examples of how low the alternative media has sunk. Truth News Radio is, or should I say was, way ahead of them all ahead of them all in terms of credibility How sad that its come to this.
By Eugene on 2015 06 28 - 17:28:56
From the entry 'Introducing Internet.org: Mark Zuckerberg's free 'private' internet which will soon be rolled out to 4 billion+ people'.
Archives
May, 2017April, 2017
March, 2017
February, 2017
January, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
October, 2016
September, 2016
August, 2016
July, 2016
June, 2016
May, 2016
April, 2016
March, 2016
February, 2016
January, 2016
December, 2015
November, 2015
October, 2015
September, 2015
August, 2015
July, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
April, 2015
March, 2015
February, 2015
January, 2015
December, 2014
November, 2014
October, 2014
September, 2014
August, 2014
July, 2014
June, 2014
May, 2014
April, 2014
March, 2014
February, 2014
January, 2014
December, 2013
November, 2013
October, 2013
September, 2013
August, 2013
July, 2013
June, 2013
May, 2013
April, 2013
Comments
Please review the Terms of Service before reading or responding to comments.
Firstly, we need to decide whether or not it should be government policy to increase Australia’s population whether through birth or immigration.<br><br>The Queensland and Australian governments literally plan to cram well over a million more people into South East Queensland by 2031 in spite of the fact that past population growth has caused our water crises, traffic congestion, bus rage, train rage, pedestrian rage, overloaded power generation, housing shortages, housing hyper-inflation, etc, etc.<br><br>This is happening because our political leaders are no more than glove puppets for the Growth Lobby of which I have written in “How the Growth Lobby threatens Australia’s future” published on Online Opinion on 9 Feb 2009. (My article draws from Sheila Newman’s Master Thesis downloadable from http://candobetter.org/sheila)<br><br>Secondly, the birth rate still exceeds the death rate in spite of the birth rate being less than two. This is because of our longer life span. Of course, eventually a birth rate of less than 2 must lead to a drop in population, but for now our population is increasing even without immigration. <br><br>And if Australia’s population were to drop, would that necessarily a bad thing given the grave harm that is now being done to the Australian environment with 21 million Australians?<br><br>I personally don’t know whether or not a one child policy is necessary for Australia.<br><br>What we do need is a population policy that will ensure that our numbers do not exceed this country’s natural carrying capacity. At the moment it is obvious that they do. Perhaps if someone could show how we can sustain our current population without causing irreparable ecological damage, we could then consider whether or not it should be increased, but to deliberately try to increase it given the parlous state of Australia’s environment is reckless folly.<br><br>BTW, this is also being discussed in the Online Opinion forum in response to the (pro-population-growht) article Planet Earth - babies need not apply .
By James Sinnamon on 2009 05 03 - 16:44:49
How can encouraging killing children be good for anyone? This is a stupid debate, just listen to talks concerning GM foods, junk foods, Big_Pharma poisions and Vaccination Damage and realise that people are already dying at unprecedented rates. Don’t forget the alarming fertility decline either.
By playtoh on 2009 05 21 - 15:14:57
No-one is encouraging the killing of children to reduce population. Where does this false assertion come from? What is its purpose?<br><br>With regard to the graph: this is the famous ‘demographic transition’ which occurs when the cost of raising children (due to education etc), child labour laws which prohibit deriving income from children, and reduced rates of infant death, makes having several counter productive. Add to this the education of women where delaying or not having children can be economically more worth-while if a woman is highly skilled.<br><br>We are talking consumer economies. The only economies where having big families makes sense are agricultural ones where children make a difference to production or where children can be sent to work in factories and their wages are the only way parents with no land can increase their income.<br><br>In farming, having large families backfires when they grow up because, either they all inherit the land and then farms get too fragmented to produce OR primogeniture and sex-based inheritance laws favour usually the first-born, leaving the rest with only their labour to sell - giving us the famous paradigm in England, where the first son got the land, the second son had to go into the army and the third son went into the church. England became known in this way as the land of orphans and dispossessed and was the first country to favour high birth rates among the landless. These fertile landless provided a cheap exploitable workforce for agriculture and later for the industrial revolution. <br><br>That is the paradigm that the population boosters - the ones who want a big population - are relying on.<br><br>The graph of birth-rates is very similar to France’s, and is higher than most comparable countries.<br><br>It is abnormal to have continuous population growth, via immigration or via birth rates.<br><br>Australians have intuitively responded to rising costs of living, of having children and have sought to conserve their quality of life and living standards by reducing family sizes, on average.<br><br>The problem is that government and corporations are seeking to raise the price of assets and resources by scarcity and to drop the cost of labour at the same time. Those corporations which own a lot of assets and resources hope to make a lot of money out of the - water, agricultural land, land for housing (owned by banks).<br><br>So they bring in lots of immigrants and try to boost the birth rate.<br><br>This is anti-democratic becuase the people have no say and it runs counter to local trends which testify to a desire to stabilise or to reduce populationgrowth and numbers.
By astridnova on 2009 05 23 - 08:05:05
? ?? ?????? ?? ?????????, ? ???????
By Cederash on 2009 05 23 - 22:03:33
How can encouraging killing children be good for anyone? This is a stupid debate, just listen to talks concerning GM foods, junk foods, Big_Pharma poisions and Vaccination Damage and realise that people are already dying at unprecedented rates. Don’t forget the alarming fertility decline either.
By LW on 2009 05 29 - 04:46:01
[...] Truth News Radio Australia Australia historical fertility rate Posted by root 8 minutes ago (http://www.truthnews.com.au) Don 39 t forget the alarming fertility decline either comment from astridnova powered by wordpress theme design by andreas viklund Discuss | Bury | News | Truth News Radio Australia Australia historical fertility rate [...]
By Truth News Radio Australia Australia historical fe on 2009 06 09 - 06:05:15
SUP?
By Cool on 2009 07 23 - 11:26:11
Mah fren nn I rules da World!!
By Cool on 2009 07 23 - 11:27:04
???????? ?????? ??????? — ?????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????????????!
By Olegreze on 2009 09 10 - 02:55:53
??????. ???????????? ???????? - ????? ? ???????????? ?? ??????? ?? <br>? ??? ????????? ? ???? ? ??? ???? ???? - ???????? ??????? ?? ????. ?????? ????? ?????? ? ????????, ? ??? ??? ?? ?????????. ??????? ? ???????? ????? ????, ???? ?????, ??? ??????????? ? ?????? ?????, ???? ? ???? ?? ?????????? ?? ????? ???, ??????. ??? ????? ??????????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???? ?? ????? ???????????? ??????, ??? ??????. ???? ??????, ???? ??????. ??????, ??, ????? ???? ? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????, ?? ??????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ????, ?? ? ??????? ? ????????-????????. ? ??? ?????? ???? ? ????????? ??????. ??????????, ??? ??????.
By Sterlimastiv on 2009 10 06 - 02:36:28
?????? ???????? ??????? ????????
By elewheree on 2010 08 05 - 03:34:59
The graph really doesn’t look good. It seems like the trend is rather negative!
By Jenny on 2010 11 28 - 02:21:53
I [rated|liked] the [old|previous] [model|version] [better|more]
By Casey Cairns on 2010 12 07 - 17:17:09
As a man, who played a lot in the real casinos, I will mention that the positive moment of the given gamble-resource is that probabilities of falling out in roulette are maximally close to real ones. <br><br>The real facts are two hits of the ball to “zero” for 10 minutes of the game.<br><br>Playing roulette in Grand Casino, the online-casino I always win $15-30 in half an hour of a careful game. I think that such a situation is a sign of an honest game of the gambling resource. <br><br>To be fair, it is needed to say about omissions in the work of the resource from the point of view of an ordinary user.<br><br>Firstly, it is automatic acceptance of bonuses, without warning the player. <br><br>Personally I consider it as bad manners and imposing unprofitable terms of winning back the bonus. <br><br>Secondly, it is automatic writing off of the money if the player refuses the receipt of bonuses in his profile. When the won facilities were not shown out in time personally I guessed that I «got» to win back bonuses.<br>When disconnecting an option to charge bonuses in the profile I simply wanted not to get bonuses in future. <br><br>However operatively they wrote off all the money which I won after the hidden and unasked charge of a bonus. <br><br>In general, all above mentioned is a minus in the work of the site, which can embarrass players, counting on a permanent game on small stakes.<br><br>Further, Grand Casino does not have intelligible statistics of input-output of money from the player’s deposit. <br><br>For a long time I could not find out how much I won and output for a playing day. The incomprehensible history of input-output of money simply makes me angry. <br><br>It would be better to do three columns - date/time, input (the sum) and output (the sum). <br>The same disorder and mess in the section «History of games» – the time of stakes is incorrect, the history - incomplete.<br><br>In general, any contrivances are created to put a player in an unprofitable position which he cannot change in the hand mode, are not the things lift rating. <br>Statistics plays against players as well, why to make the clients’ position worse with tricks such as imposing bonuses and writing off money from the account?<br>Such a strategy is acceptable to unpresentable offices which count on a large rapid income from an unscrupulous game and does not imply a long-term presence in the market.<br>Readm more story in my Online Casino Blog
By Ovasiasap on 2010 12 08 - 05:21:38
?????? ????, ????????? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? http://geoyukon.com.ua/<br>?? ?????????? ????????, ???????? ??????? ??????? , ??????????? ???????????.<br><br>???? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ?? ????? ????.
By Ramysteacceva on 2010 12 08 - 13:42:33
As a man, who played a lot in the real casinos, I will mention that the basic advantage of the given online-casino is that probabilities of falling out in roulette are maximally close to real ones. <br><br>I can give examples are two hits of the ball to “zero” for 10 minutes of the game.<br><br>Playing roulette in Grand Casino, the online-casino I often win $15-30 in half an hour of a careful game. I think that such a situation is a sign of an honest game of the gambling establishment. <br><br>To be fair, it is needed to say about failures in the work of the resource from the point of view of an ordinary user.<br><br>Firstly, it is automatic crediting of bonuses, without warning the player. <br><br>Personally I consider it as disrespect to players and imposing unprofitable terms of winning back the bonus. <br><br>Secondly, it is automatic writing off of the won facilities if the player refuses the receipt of bonuses in his profile. When the won facilities were not shown out in time personally I guessed that I «got» to win back bonuses.<br>When cutting down an option to charge bonuses in the profile I simply wanted not to get bonuses in the next games. <br><br>However operatively they wrote off all the money which I won after the hidden and unasked charge of a bonus. <br><br>In general, all above mentioned is a drawback in the work of the site, which can embarrass players, counting on a permanent game on small stakes.<br><br>Further, Grand Casino does not have evident statistics of input-output of money from the player’s deposit. <br><br>For a long time I could not comprehend how much I won and output for a playing day. The tangled history of input-output of money simply makes me angry. <br><br>It would be better to do three columns - date/time, input (the sum) and output (the sum). <br>The same disorder and mess in the category «History of games» – the time of stakes is incorrect, the history - incomplete.<br><br>In general, any devices are created to put a player in an unprofitable position which he cannot change in the hand mode, are not the things to proud of for the casino. <br>Statistics plays against players as well, why to make the clients’ position worse with tricks such as imposing bonuses and writing off money from the account?<br>Such a strategy is acceptable to one-day offices which count on a large rapid income from an unscrupulous game and does not imply a long-term presence in the market.<br>Readm more story in my Poker blog
By Ovasiasap on 2010 12 08 - 23:45:10
trick or treat!
By MBRP Exhaust on 2010 12 09 - 10:26:16
????????? ?? ??????? ?? ???????, ?? ???? ?????? ????????? ????.<br>????????? ??????????, ?????? ???????...<br>???? ???????? java ?????, ??????, ???? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? - ??????????.<br>http://topgames.org.ua<br>???????!
By Diocuourgix on 2010 12 11 - 06:18:29
????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ? ??????? ???? !<br>??????????????? ????? http://url.servermusic.ru/index.php?YaxqNYnSzl <br>????? ????????? ??????? ? ????????? ?? 1 ???? 70 ??????. ??? ????? ??????????? ?? ?????!<br>??????????? ????? ??? ??????? 15 ??????
By ????? on 2010 12 12 - 08:04:25
Love your site. Just wanted to tell you that. Continue with the good writing.I’m a blogger myself, but not as good yet
My last post is about China Travel Deals. Feel free to visit. All BestNick
By China Deals on 2010 12 14 - 06:51:08
Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 >