Truth News Australia

Interview with Jan Irvin

This text will be replaced
Broadcast of September 12, 2012. Part 1 of 2 » Download mp3: click here
This text will be replaced
Broadcast of September 12, 2012. Part 2 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

20 September 2012 | Permalink | comments: 5
By Hereward Fenton

Share |
Categories: [ Jan Irvin, Trivium ]

Trivium Education - Where Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom Begin

Jan Irvin is the author of The Holy Mushroom: Evidence of Mushrooms in Judeo-Christianity, host of the podcast show Gnostic Media, and webmaster of Trivium Education, a website which teaches the ancient arts of Aristotelian Logic, and Classical Rhetoric.

General Grammar, Aristotelian Logic, and Classical Rhetoric comprise the first three rules-based subjects of the 7 Liberal Arts and Sciences. As these disciplines are learned and practiced together, they form the overarching, symbiotic system for establishing clarity and consistency of personal thought called the Trivium.

General Grammar

(Answers the question of the Who, What, Where, and the When of a subject.) Discovering and ordering facts of reality comprises basic, systematic Knowledge

Formal Logic

(Answers the Why of a subject.) Developing the faculty of reason in establishing valid [i.e., non-contradictory] relationships among facts, systematic Understanding

Classical Rhetoric

(Provides the How of a subject.) Applying knowledge and understanding expressively comprises Wisdom or, in other words, it is systematically useable knowledge and understanding

- http://www.triviumeducation.com

In the 2nd hour of today's show, Chris Tolland interviews Irvin on his research and insights in many subjects.

In the first hour of today's show Chris joins us for a relaxed discussion on life, the economy and politics in Australia.

I hope you enjoy the show!

Comments

Hi Hereward,
Thanks for your work love what you are doing. I am in my late 50s and have spent all my life into a system that never really sat well with me but family commitments etc you just batten down and be as ethical as you can be in a corrupt liberty stealing system.
It seems to me that we are all beneficiaries and victims of this system and have been for as long as our HIS story. The trouble with this is while we are in the system we have no redress because the system belongs to them not us. The responsibility is on us to take responsibility for ourselves and others. How do we do that? Think outside the box there are solutions, but we need to be couragous and it will only take a few to live the life by example and the it will spread so that we can truly be free unique beings,instead of the drones we have become, suppressed since our birth.
We cannot protest peacefully or otherwise they won’t listen you see we still need the system so we beg them to stop but it is their system so they choose if they comply with our request or not.
Please interview Arthur Cristian of loveforlife he has some unique insights and solutions and I am sure you and your listeners would love to hear his positive message of solution even though it may be confronting.
For humanities freedom
Alex

By Alex Schepis on 2012 09 21 - 10:36:31

Grey urban wasteland ? Yes it has a lot of work needed but certainly nothing like the picture you paint. Sydney is full of people and they are what defines a city. Prison like ? Compared to most cities we are doing OK. We’re in paradise by comparison.
Yes I admit there has been a gradual degradation in our quality of life and we must be vigilant and STOP the global cabal from stripping away more rights and more value from our currency but don’t talk it down to an unrealistic level. Honestly you make Sydney sound like Calcutta, do you prepare what you’re going to say or just make it up as you go because honestly Hereward that’s how it comes across.
Maybe it’s me, I’ve always looked for the good, the positive aspects of what I see which keeps one on an even keel even though I’m aware of the bad. Searching for the negative and ignoring the positive is the key to disaster, you’ll become frozen by depression and will be unable to deal with anything.

By Frank on 2012 09 30 - 15:04:30

“do you prepare what you’re going to say or just make it up as you go because honestly Hereward that’s how it comes across”

A pretty harsh judgement there Frank, from somebody who “has always looked for the good and positive aspects” of what he sees.

I think you need to take a look in the mirror before casting nasturtiums at others.

By Hereward Fenton on 2012 10 04 - 02:57:14

Good week of radio. I always wondered why I struggled with maths at school and now I know. The whole education system is dumbed-down. I didn’t know that Rockefeller said he wanted a lot of workers but not a lot of thinkers.

And yes, with the first hour about the quality of life in Sydney… etc we’ve got to question that for the whole country too. There could be foot shortages, but yet we let the Chinese buy our farms! That makes a lot of sense! So yes, definitely things are going way downhill in this country. But this is happening in America and even Barack Obama had the wisdom to turn reject the proposal of a Chinese owned windmill farm near a naval facility!

Anyway, your show gave me a lot to think about the education system and I did not know you could not barter beyond $10000 in Australia. Thanks guys!

By Bill Weavers on 2012 10 05 - 20:34:40

Many Australian made food products are cheaper on New Zealand supermarket shelves. Presumably because we are good at being ripped-off.

By Michael B on 2012 10 09 - 20:40:03

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

You are currently visiting as a guest, to login or register please click here.


RSS feed icon

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.


1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?


If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Hereward Fenton
Hereward Fenton

Categories