Julian Assange in the crosshairs

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of August 16, 2012. Part 1 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of August 16, 2012. Part 2 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

19 August 2012 | Permalink | comments: 4
By Hereward Fenton

Share |

Categories: [ Black Salve, Iran, Julian Assange ]

Julian Assange supporters

Today's show focuses on the stand-off between Julian Assange and the British government. The news about his acceptance by Ecuador had not yet broken as we went to air.

We also take a look at the science-fiction level totalitarian surveillance system known as "TrapWire", amid speculation that this invasive technique of "crime prevention" may be already in use in Australia. We note that all copies of an article on the topic (originally published in the Fairfax press) have now abeen deleted. The original article can still be found here, courtesy of Fair Dinkum Radio.

Other themes addressed in the show include the escalating rhetoric of war against Iran, the Australian nanny state, and a look at the a testimonial regarding the alternative cancer cure known as "black salve".

Related Links

Comments

How does your catch phrase of “going beyond the spin” have any credibility when most of the related links are to MSM sites
renown for spin and lies and you read from ABC media.
I think Assange should be treated fairly under international law.
The question is what has he told us that we haven’t learnt from
many other sources across the web. To evaluate Assange we need
to look at what he hasn’t told us and who publishes his so
called leaks.
Why don’t you interview world class alternative media and
journalists like Robert Fisk and Peter Eyre.

By Rob on 2012 08 23 - 10:47:03

Iv been a Labour man all my life & Im ashamed of you Julia Gillard American brown nose .This is Australia not America.

By Brian Eade on 2012 08 27 - 23:36:39

Labor/Liberal the two headed dragon, I’m stunned that intelligent people still buy this two party bullshit. Two sides of the same coin, they’re both corrupted by the same bankers and corporate machine.
Gillard is a Fabian. The Fabian Society’s aim is to covertly bring in a worldwide communist government, what more do people need to understand that Gillard and her lackies don’t give a rat’s arse about us. It’s POWER that turns them on but I don’t care anymore they’ll be dropped by the Elite and locked up alongside the rest of us. I’ve given up on the Western mainstream sheep. The Elite are right when they see most of the people as stupid useless eaters.

By Tony on 2012 11 01 - 09:21:53

@ rob “How does your catch phrase of “going beyond the spin” have any credibility when most of the related links are to MSM sites “

lol - just reading the name hereward fenton is enough to make anyone giddy.. he is spin personified!

assange is a fake

http://aangirfan.blogspot.com.au/2010/12/assanges-wikileaks-is-fake.html

@ brian.. julia gillard should definitely be despised as much as howard, abbott, all ot them.. but australia became part of america decades ago..

@ tony, if australia is a capitalist society now, i dont see how communism, or even blatant fascism could be any worse - as far as world wide government is concerned, i dont think fabians have a monopoly on that agenda either.

By meagain on 2012 11 01 - 10:00:51

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.

1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?

If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.