Lord Monckton on climate change fraud

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of January 26, 2010. Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

27 January 2010 | Permalink | comments: 40

Share |

Categories: [ Climate Change, COP15 Conference, ETS, Lord Monckton, World Government ]

Today we are joined by Lord Christopher Monckton, British peer, mathematician, and former advisor to the Prime Minister.

Lord Monckton, currently in Australia on a speaking tour, is one of the most outspoken and influential anthropogenic climate change sceptics, bringing a level of passion and intellectual rigour which is often missing in public debate. He is chief policy adviser to the Science and Public Policy Institute, a non-profit institute of research and education "dedicated to sound public policy based on sound science".

Lord Monckton rose to prominence in the global warming debate with articles published in November 2006 disputing whether global warming is man-made, suggesting that it was unlikely to prove catastrophic, and criticising the science presented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Lord Monckton also played a role in a 2007 UK High Court of Justice legal challenge in a bid to prevent the Al Gore film, "An Inconvenient Truth" being shown in English schools without offering alternative, balancing opinions. He was involved in distributing the documentary, "The Great Global Warming Swindle" to schools as a riposte.

During the interview Lord Monckton recounts the reasons why he came to be an anthropogenic climate change sceptic, in the context of his experience as a policy advisor to former PM Margaret Thatcher. He goes on to enumerate some of the more egregious lies and distortions made by the IPCC scientists and then turns to look at the anti-democratic agenda of the politicians and business leaders who he describes as corporate fascists. These interests, he asserts are striving to create a dictatorial, unelected world government which will oppress and exploit ordinary working people on a global level.

Related Links

Lord Monckton tour dates

Alan Jones talks to Lord Christopher Monckton

Lord Monckton is on the fringe: Barnaby Joyce

Climate sceptic Christopher Monckton to 'prove Rudd wrong'

British climate sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton slams Kevin Rudd's ETS

Climate denier lords it over scientists and their `global warning nonsense'

Comments

More good work, Hereward. Well done. I know it would have been off topic and un-proffesional, though I was dying to hear you ask this man of conscience a question on 911 and how IT has effected our democracy.

By pr on 2010 01 27 - 09:11:13

Whoops. Now that was un-professional!

By pr on 2010 01 27 - 09:27:44

WAIT TILL 20/20 PLEASE I would like RUDD or EMPLOYEE to stop spending our money on Global warming as we are still developing our nation and we wouldn’t even see a significant difference for the money we are spending and by the way has any body taken into account that the manufacturing of these extra products mandated for our homes like insulation and solar panels ect create pollution to manufacture and that most of the world will still burn coal even if we change SIMPLY GIVE OUR ECONOMY AND BREAK AND WAIT AND SEE IF GLOBAL WARMING DOES REALLY EXIST

By Matthew on 2010 01 27 - 15:26:15

Great interview TNRA’s best show ever! Hereward you really have the goods, well done brother…I truly mean it! Respect John

By John Bursill on 2010 01 28 - 19:31:40

I would have to agree with Bursill, not that Hereward and John don’t provide informative commentary on their own. It’s great that Monckton had decided to give our illegitimate rulers a hard time about anthropogenic global warming and hopefully stop yet more transfer of wealth to the rich and decrease of freedoms. It’s good that he found time for this podcast with what I assume is a small listenership.

By Mark on 2010 01 31 - 11:59:21

Its good to see some opposition in parliament now thanks to Tony Abbott, with real plans to help the environment. So glad they got rid of that fake Liberal Turnbull. Like Monckton said this current government is poison. Rudd is a fascist, Marxist, poison who this year along with Wong and Conroy need to be removed from power before they sell Australia out.

By Damian on 2010 02 03 - 11:30:33

Labor and Liberal are one party pretending to be two Damian, Abbott was only scoring political points as it turned out and still buys the global warming hype. He wants to throw away an awful lot of taxpayer money in this hard economic time with his own plan to cut CO2 emissions. http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/tony-abbott-reveals-simpler-cheaper-climate-plan/story-e6frg12c-1225825958195

By Mark on 2010 02 03 - 15:18:14

Keep up the good work guys. Was reading the Sunday Telecrap (Sunday Agenda section) today (7/2/2010) and there an article/opinion by Cardinal George Pell saying that he looked up and noticed that CO2 and Global temperatures were higher during the medieval period and that the world is cooling. Good to see that the ‘mainstream’ media is showing more of the other side of the debate and that other figure heads questioning the theory.

By Dennis on 2010 02 07 - 16:14:37

I still believe there are some good people in politics Mark. There is good and bad in all things. I especially like Barnaby Joyce. Just moving from a farming area myself I have seen how they are losing control of the lands in the country (note to T.N.R to do a story on this). Barnaby is out there being a voice meeting with farmers and going against the norm. Maybe Mr Abbott just can’t say straight out “I don’t believe in Global Warming” because the media and the people asleep will cut him down. He has to be seen doing something. As a owner of 2 companies I am glad at lest one major party is stopping the ETS and coming up with a fair idea. We can’t stop everything Mark but at lest we can control some things.

By Damian on 2010 02 08 - 10:53:11

Lord Monckton has been sent to let the air out of the Man-Mad Climate Change tyres…

By Adam Neira on 2010 02 08 - 21:10:00

Hey guys, I had the pleasure of meeting, Mr Pilmer and Lord Monckton when filming the Lecture here in Adelaide. If anyone is interested in seeing the lecture, let me know and I will send you copy as soon as I finish the edit (for a small fee). Probably will Google Video too.

By playtoh on 2010 02 11 - 00:06:01

Did anyone listen to the live debate yesterday with the Lord and Tim Lambert (a UNSW Computer Scientist)? It was on the SMH site. It was a good debate from both sides and the only one in aust while Monckton is here. He corrected Monckton on a few occasions and said to check his blog for the details of his correction. Not sure if you can find the video any more. Here is Tim Lambert site. http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/

By Dennis on 2010 02 13 - 10:31:18

the science is settled. monckton is a gerbil. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/heat-is-on-right-across-the-continent/story-e6frg6xf-1225841112583

By hot1 on 2010 03 18 - 12:20:59

fine topic , search this from blogsearch after that good luck for you.just add the rss feed toward my reader,keep bring up to date!

By NallPailk on 2010 04 14 - 19:33:52

Hi, visualize me on lisachu http://board.hyphymovement.com/index.php?showuser=17961 http://www.nilechat.net/phpBB2/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=194779

By Fultoppothe on 2010 12 07 - 15:01:57

By Madison Cairns on 2010 12 07 - 19:11:26

Hi, glom me on lisachu http://www.airsdeparis.centrepompidou.fr/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=107626 board.hyphymovement.com/index.php?showuser=17961

By Fultoppothe on 2010 12 08 - 00:26:37

Hi there, where can I subscribe to your blog? I like it, thanksPeace

By jailbreak 4.2.1 ipad on 2010 12 08 - 06:46:38

Tired of obtaining low amounts of useless visitors for your site? Well i want to let you know about a fresh underground tactic that produces me personally $900 each day on 100% AUTOPILOT. I really could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you simply check their website out? There is a great video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in making quick money this is the site for you. Auto Traffic Avalanche

By Lekisha Kralicek on 2010 12 08 - 09:52:22

Hi, certain me on lisachu http://www.rusdivx.net/ibf/index.php?showuser=182918 http://www.mtxaudio.eu/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=142411

By Fultoppothe on 2010 12 08 - 10:48:56

Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 >

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.

1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?

If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.