Truth News Australia

Subscribe to TNRA
Subscribe to TNRA

The Great Apollo Moon Swindle

July 29, 2009, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

30 July 2009 | Permalink | comments: 3

Categories: [ Apollo Moon Missions ]

Tonight we present a special feature in honour of the 40th anniversary of the (alleged) Apollo 11 moon landing.

In keeping with our mission to venture beyond the spin of mainstream news, we plunge into the outer limits of skepticism to revisit the Apollo hoax theories. Our guest tonight is Jarrah White, a young Australian man who has dedicated considerable time and resources to debunking the widely held belief that men did indeed walk upon the moon between 1969 and 1972.

The first half of the show consists of a discussion between myself and Jarrah, while in the second half we are joined in robust debate by Josh Jackson and our regular guest John Bursill (a registered aircraft engineer).

Jarrah has produced a number of documentaries on the subject of the moon landings which you can watch for free on his youtube channel.

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="540" caption="NASA LRO Image showing Apollo sites"]NASA LRO Image[/caption]


 



MoonFaker: No Crater (by Jarrah White)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEQNZQdJFtI

More Links


Update 30 July 2009 - Jarrah sent this:
I just noticed something. In my interview I said "Apollo 12 was to be the first time they bring a video camera to the moon". I mispoke. I meant to say "Apollo 12 was to be the first time they bring a COLOUR video camera to the moon".

Comments

If I should happen to meet Mr White I would treat him the same way as Buzz Aldrin treated Bart Sibrel.

By Terence Kierans on 2009 08 02 - 11:26:21

hi thanks for the info.

By Nyard on 2010 12 10 - 00:33:40

Enter comments below, then click Submit:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Listen Live

Recent Comments

the comments by the writer dont actually reflect that they do not represent anything that is exclusive of evolution.  Darwin knew full well the complexities of nature and his incomplete understanding of the subject.  religious movements are jealous of his accomplishments in observation and history of biology.  in terms of fame he rivals Jesus and this is extremely distasteful to fundamentalists.

By gconey on 2014 09 21 - 15:36:52
From the entry 'Charles Darwin debunked!'.

the comments by the writer dont actually reflect that they do not represent anything that is exclusive of evolution.  Darwin knew full well the complexities of nature and his incomplete understanding of the subject.  religious movements are jealous of his accomplishments in observation and history of biology.  in terms of fame he rivals Jesus and this is extremely distasteful to fundamentalists.

By gconey on 2014 09 21 - 15:36:46
From the entry 'Charles Darwin debunked!'.

With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any solutions to help prevent content from being stolen? I’d definitely appreciate it.

By Christina on 2014 09 21 - 12:56:26
From the entry 'What hit the Pentagon?'.

With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any solutions to help prevent content from being stolen? I’d definitely appreciate it.

By Christina on 2014 09 21 - 12:56:15
From the entry 'What hit the Pentagon?'.

Hi Josh
I don’t need any more evidence. I need answers.
Why are there so many of these trails when rain is likely or predicted?
How about the people at the helm, the political minitures, sign documents at their own unlimited commercial liability saying the there is no Geoengineering happening? Lets see if they have the guts to do that. If not, why not? Is something being hidden? Why are there near 150 patents for chemical weather remediation? Lots of whys and you wish to dampen the fire of resistance. I guess fluoride and vaccinations are no problem either?
The rot must be stopped and it won’t be by sitting on our hands.
Selah
Cris

By Cris on 2014 09 20 - 19:23:32
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

weather patterns are changing, something scientists have predicted would happen for quite a while.

How is that relevant in the debate about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2014 09 20 - 17:24:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Cris,

before initiating a petition, you want to be sure that the issues you list are real.

What you need is a sample from a contrail, taken in the presence of witnesses, analyzed in a lab to show all components contained. Pointing to Youtube videos as evidence will not be enough. How do you know that the video creators got it right?

The original meme of Chemtrails is that any trail that is not short-lived must be something else, and that persistent trails are something new. As shown before, both of these are wrong assumptions.

It’s just a matter of the favorable atmospheric conditions, and has been observed since the first airplanes were able to reach high altitudes.

So why assume that persistent contrails are something evil in the first place?

By the way, HAARP and weather modification (rain making) were stacked upon the first claims only later. However, cloud seeding is known since the 1940s and has never been a secret or been applied on a larger scale.

HAARP had interacted with the ionosphere which has no influence on the troposphere far below (where the weather happens). It is being dismantled right now.

What’s left are countless images and videos of contrails, sun dogs, haze layers. Would you accept if officials tell you these are all effects of tiny ice crystals?

If not, then what would you be prepared to accept?

By Josh on 2014 09 20 - 17:22:38
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Two heads are always better than one

Oakley Half Jacket Sunglasse

By Oakley Half Jacket Sunglasse on 2014 09 19 - 10:50:03
From the entry 'Join the Info War - Subscribe to TNRA!'.

Write down what you’re grateful for each day. In moments when you’re feeling really down, read
Oakley Half Jacket Sunglasse

By Oakley Half Jacket Sunglasse on 2014 09 19 - 10:50:00
From the entry 'Anatomy of a terrorist attack: the Boston Marathon Bombing'.

Tom Jones: Thank you for taking the time to read my post. You are correct when you say that the term ‘anti-semite’ is the wrong way to address the issue of Jew hatred. The semites comprise of four ethnic groups, including Jews, Arabs, Phoenicians and Armenians, yet somehow it’s been branded as Jewish. It’s a little bit like the word gay, meaning happy. It means happy but because it has been popularised as relating to homosexual people, now people think that before it’s intended meaning. Semite evokes thoughts of Jews, regardless of its history.

Wikipedia defines thought crimes as “....an occurrence or instance of controversial or socially unacceptable thoughts.” It would be punishable in the movie 1984, but I think we’d be hard pressed to see it happening in a free nation like Australia. On the other hand, I don’t think you can fairly say that words and speech are harmless. After all, Hitler forged the third reich with words. Words put millions of people in gas chambers and caused a war affecting the entire world. Had he been thrown (and kept) in jail, it is doubtful such a catastrophe would have happened. This flip flop wearing camera wielding big mouth obviously doesn’t have the political cunning of Adolf, but it was clear in his films that he intended to collect followers to harm Jews in unknown ways. But he did mention his will to throw them in work camps - sensitive huh? Brendan was intending to use words to villify and harm a particular group of people, that happened to be Jews and that is why he was jailed.

So no, I don’t think three years of maximum security confinement is a suitable prison term for him, unless it cured him of his prejudices and will to be a public menace.

antisemite: of all the Jews I’ve met, it seems they are more ‘anti-stupid’ than anything else. But nobody said you have to like them, just that in Australia the rule is live and let live, so follow the law at least.

By Jakob on 2014 09 19 - 01:55:56
From the entry 'Meet Brendon O'Connell, Australia's first political prisoner'.

Categories