You know what worries me even more than the predatory agenda of the ruling elites?

It's the tendency of truthers to fall into line like lemmings on any given conspiracy, to engage in mass group think and, even worse, the readiness to leap to defammatory accusations about people whom they know nothing about.

This really worries me, because with friends like this, who needs enemies? People with this psychological tendency could turn on anyone (including their comrades) in a heartbeat, merely because of some allegation or innuendo put forth by a smooth talking youtube vlogger.

This type of thing has happened in past revolutions by the way, resulting in purges of alleged "counter-revolutionaries" who were often the best, most honest and genuine. It happened in the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution.

For the record, I do NOT believe the mainstream narrative on Sandy Hook. As for the conspiracy claims, I don't believe them either.

Actually I don't believe any supplied narrative. I look for facts, which are provable. I believe in my own ability to discern truth from fiction, if there is enough information. If there is not enough information on a given subject, I refrain from making strong assertions.

I have questions and concerns about Sandy Hook, but they don't lead to the kind of accusations which are now rampant on the internet.

I think accusing grieving family members of being actors without a shred of evidence other than your own dubious gut feeling is sick, pathetic and stupid.

I'm ashamed to be associated with people who think like this. Count me out of the Sandy Hook truther movement!

Related Links

• Your comprehensive answer to every Sandy Hook conspiracy theory

I have once again received an ominous threat, allegedly from the group "Anonymous", and once again because of my sceptical response to claims about the existence of a global aeorsol spraying campaign known as "chemtrails", and because I insist that such claims must be supported by evidence in order to be taken seriously.

These latest threats follow on the heels of threats made last week:

I hope you know about zombie trojans and how to check for them. Buckle up boys the ride is about to get bumpy

So, because I follow the basic principals of empirical research and science, I am now branded an enemy by so called "hacktivists" who hide behind anonymity, preach about freedom of speech, and terrorise independent blog editors.

The most ironic and Orwellian part of all this is that, while on the one hand they threaten to shut down or "deface" my website, on the other hand they accuse me of censorship, all because a few posts have been deleted and a few IP addresses have blocked. They of course neglect to mention that  I have allowed a mega thread on the subject to continue for many months, and that I have asked people from both sides of the argument to actually come on my show and have a debate.

If this is the calibre of the frontline of chemtrail activists, then what does that tell you about the whole movement? Think about it.

Here is the latest message, in full:

Hello truthnews.com.au,

 We are anonymous and you should by now realise your troubles are much bigger than any single issue like "Chemtrailers". Until now "media" has been exempt from attack. As exemplified by upcoming actions towards Julian Assange the leakpimp, many have reconsidered this position.

Is hacktivism and distributed denial of service violence? What then a temporary defacing or data theft? When you posted onto Facebook "I'm screwed" & "They have stolen all my data" with the thread "Thugs have threatened to shut down TNRA" was that a lie, request, prediction or mistake? Time will tell.

Truth News censorship is bad for truthful debate. You censor others but are outraged it could happen to you. We found amusement in you advocating get off face book 'via' face book. Webmaster excuses aside, it's double standards.

Do you understand the difference between physical violence & digital activism? Are you ready for a lesson? You would be foolish to underestimate the importance of this message. Our rage is greater than your outrage! Stand corrected and retract, otherwise all your bases are belong to us.

We Are Anonymous
We Are Legion
We Do Not Forgive
We Do Not Forget

Some of the fanatical chemtrail believers are posting threats on this website, eg:

Hereward as a computer whatever I hope you know about zombie trojans and how to check for them. Buckle up boys the ride is about to get bumpy

These threats are of course pathetic and indicative of a major chip on the shoulder. I doubt the author is even capable of "walking the talk", but I'm flattered nonetheless that he thinks TNRA is important enough to warrant such an attack.

These threats are purportedly coming as a result of my sceptical position on chemtrails, believe it or not!

The fact that chemtrailers are willing to entertain the idea of using violence against TNRA should indicate to you that there is something amiss with the whole chemtrails movement.

I believe "chemtrails" is quite likely a psyop, similar to the 9/11 "no-planes" meme, designed to sew discord and division among the community of truth seekers by injecting absurd and empirically unsound claims into general discussion.

I believe the fundamentally evil intent of those promoting "chemtrails" is exposed in these threats against me, simply for taking a sceptical position (ie: asking for evidence).

These are the classic bully tactics of fascists, who use a mix of deception, violence and mob mentality to destabilise their opposition.

This is not in the spirit of the truth movement. These guys have been outed by their own hand.

I hope this will prompt all our regular listeners to reconsider what I have been saying about chemtrails all along, to ask the hard questions, and honestly look at both sides of the argument.

Let it be known that I will, at my discretion, ban people who are persistently rude, persistently off-topic in a spammy way, expose privileged personal information, make libelous accusations, or (most pertinently) use threats in lieu of argument and evidence to make their point! If you are already banned it's because you fall into one of these categories. If you email me and promise me not to do it again I may lift the ban. The ball is in your court.

Related Links

• Contrail Facts
• Pre WWII Contrails
• WWII Contrails
• New Mexicans for Science and Reason
• Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?

5 Australian soldiers killed and the media/government oligarchy are engaging in a paroxysm of fake grief - really just a form of propaganda.

Obama kills dozens of innocents in drone attacks every week and the media doesn't give a rat's backside.

They talk about "rogue attacks" as if this is some aberration which has no rational explanation, when in fact this is only to be expected since we invaded and occupied a sovereign nation. The current Afhhanistan government is a puppet regime, propped up by a combination of military force and copious amounts of money. It will fall in the end, like all imperial puppet governments have in the past.

A time may come when we are invaded and occupied - if the US empire retreats from our shores and we are left all alone  as a western nation at the bottom end of Asia.

I wonder how much mercy we will get from our conquerors then?

This clip is from the film "Hitler: The Rise of Evil".

It is often said, "all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing".

As a follow up, we might add: "History seldom repeats, but it often rhymes".

Once again, freedom is under threat. Evil is rising.

What are YOU doing about it?

On 5 August 2012 a rally was held in Sydney in support of the Syrian government by members of the Syrian community and Australians.

Some four thousand people gathered peacefully at The Sydney Town Hall to express solidarity about the tragedy in Syria.

A number of speakers, from various sections of the community, addressed the audience concerning the external forces that have invaded Syria and are fighting the elected democratic government.

The people then marched peacefully to The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs in the Sydney city area, where more speakers addressed the people.

Appreciation for Russia and China voting against the US proposed UN-NATO involvement were expressed. The meeting then peacefully dispersed.

Do you like TNRA? Would like to help us make TNRA better, stronger and more effective? If the answer is yes, read on!

There are some areas we need help with, which I have listed below. These may require some basic technical skills and knowldge of online editing environments.

• Youtube Uploads - it would be great if every show could be posted on our Youtube account. The account is currently not length-restricted, so there is no need to cut the files into chunks. Instead you would create Youtube time markers, which allow users to quckly get to the section they are looking for.
• Documentation - as an enhancement to the Youtube posts, it would be great if each section of the show could be briefly documented. Ideally these notes would be associated with Youtube time markers and placed in the Youtube description field.
• Original Content - Would you like to write a regular article for TNRA? If you would like to write for us we can set you up with a blog which will have a dedicated URL (as well as appearing on the main page of the site). All original content would be correctly attributed to you and you would retain all rights to that material.
• Social Networking - we currently have Twitter and Facebook accounts. It would be great to have more admins posting quality links on these channels. It would also be great to have someone create and maintain TNRA accounts on other social networks like Google + or anywhere else you think is worthwhile.
• Producer - would you like to help arrange interviews and provide suggestions about potential interview subjects? The process of arranging interviews includes, 1) contacting a subject, 2) negotiating a suitable time, 3) locking in the exact time, making sure to include correct time zone calculations, 4) emailing all recipients, and sending reminders.

If any of these jobs look interesting to you please let me know via the contact page of this website or by email.

I would of course love to be able to pay for these services, but for now that is not possible. Your help will be greatly appreciated and in the event that we do move to a profitable commercial basis you will be at the front of the queue for some financial remuneration!

(: Hereward

The recent ‘Batman’ massacre in Colorado has evinced several characteristics of past gun related atrocities which, if anything, only serve to seriously undermine evidence against these alleged ‘lone gunman’. This incident is clearly becoming a precursor for a campaign to restrict gun ownership in the United States.

On 28th April 1996 the Port Arthur massacre which claimed 35 lives, was until then the greatest massacre executed by an ‘individual’, and was seminal in the subsequent evisceration of Australian gun ownership rights thereafter. Upon closer scrutiny however, the similarity of facts make these ‘lone gunmen’ suppositions at best ridiculous to downright impossible. Moreover, elements of these dubious circumstances tend to chillingly parallel similar terror related events in recent history, which strongly indicate a pattern of governmental participation.

Article Continues »

This excellent video was produced by the video production company Koozzoo for Civil Liberties Australia.

BBC's Newsnight last night interviewed a London based Syrian businessman who stated that the families murdered by terrorists in Houla were supporters of the Syrian government, not the opposition.

If correct this would make it highly unlikely that the narrative pushed by the mainstream media is true, and suggests the opposite is the case: the atrocity was committed not by the Assad regime but by the insurgents, supported by NATO, Al Qaeda and the gulf arab dictators, and reported to be covertly armed by Turkey's Muslim Brotherhood linked government.

The official story of the Houla massacre has changed substantially since it first broke, with unconfirmed reports from insurgents (routinely described on the BBC as activists). Version one, corroborated by at least one BBC corespondent, had it that the victims were killed by heavy weapons of the Syrian army. Version two was that villagers had been randomly killed by militias sponsored by the Assad government. Version three, the current version, concedes that most of the victims came from a few extended families.

It should not be difficult to establish who the families were loyal to: the insurgents or the Syrian government. The Syrian businessman on Newsnight stated they were related to an MP elected in recent elections which the insurgents have boycotted.

It was not clear whether the information from the Syrian businessman was expected in this live TV show. The potential bombshell was ignored by hawkish presenter Gavin Essler and high profile warmonger Paul Wolfovitz, who demanded a military attack on Syria. A UN spokesman refused Essler's invitation to confirm that the Houla victims were killed by Syrian government forces.

If we now hear less and less about the massacre with no further details, many will conclude that the prima facie suspects for the atrocity are the insurgents, backed by NATO and the Gulf arab dictators, aided and abetted by the mainstream media, including the BBC. This would be a classic false flag terrorist atrocity.
Ironically the Egyptian branch of the Muslim Bortherhood has denounced the 9/11 attacks as a false flag atrocity organised by Israel or the CIA.

In one way this would be good news: there are no logistical reasons why these people cannot be arrested, prosecuted and tried. It is established in international law that propaganda on behalf of war criminals is in itself a war crime. The fact that no-one would expect this to happen is testimony to the tacit acceptance that NATO governments and media have no real interest in human rights.