Truth News Australia

The Copenhagen Plot

This text will be replaced
Broadcast of November 2, 2009. Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

03 November 2009 | Permalink | comments: 17

Is the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference a front for the next phase of world domination by a supra-national elite of bankers and their political lap-dogs? Is Copenhagen launch pad for a World Government which will extort money from the entire human race in the form of "carbon taxes"? These concerns are addressed in tonight's edition of TNRA.

Also in tonight's show, we look at the mounting evidence that the Federal Labor and Liberal parties are merely branches of the same organisation.

In the second half we bring you a review of Alex Jones' latest production - "Fall of the Republic", and we look at the disturbing prediction by U.S. Senator Ron Paul that the current economic "green shoots" will soon give way to a much deeper and darker recession, mirroring the pattern of the Great Depression.

A great show!

More Links:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddQvhdCyhe4

Comments

LOL Love the comedy sting grin

By Peaky Ramone on 2009 11 04 - 08:04:02

A good show, blokes.<br>Thanks for the heads-up re. Albrechtsen discussing Monckton in The Oz.<br>I’d seen the speech a while ago and thought it powerful, and to discover it being discussed in the msm is encouraging, though as you’d said kind of surprising, given the climate we’re in.<br><br>I agree with your assessment of AJ’s latest, Hereward. He’s been smart enough to tone down his hyperbole and use credible talking heads like Celente, Keiser and Watt, instead. I’ll have no aqualms handing this AJ production around.<br>Sure Josh, (he claims) to be about American sovereignty, and you espousing a borderless anarcho climate would have a problem with this - ultimately if/when the global tyranny arrives I think your model IS the way we’ll resist - however preserving what’s good about America at the moment is a way of keeping that scenario at bay. No?<br>This is why I agree with H again, use this program to share info that is not reaching a wide enough audience. Try and grab some of that ‘Australian’ readership. And less of your anarchist leanings ( however sympathetic I am with it’s ideals ), Josh, and definately less of Pharaoh Fenton’s pitch for power. It’s obvious you’re an ambitious fella, H, though better left un advertised, eh?<br>You should be taking this format to community radio to broadcast, the info is too important to only narrowcast…<br>The conversation about modern day sport, gladiators and Male identity by you, and in AJ’s film is spot on! Most important.<br><br>I’ve only recently come across a 1967 British TV series called The Prisoner.<br>In this interview in 1977, it’s creator Patrick McGoohan, talks about themes discussed in 911 Truth circles.<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6gPztzkNMQ&feature=related<br>The show reminds me of that Gene Wilder film, Rhinocerous you posted about, a while ago.<br>He sees himself as a John The Savage type, from BNW?<br> <br>Keep up the interesting programs.<br>Thanks.

By pr on 2009 11 04 - 08:12:54

I watched the whole prisoner series recently. I loved it, although it gets a bit silly in the final episodes. <br><br>If we can find a radio station to host us and a time slot that works I will grab the opportunity with both hands.<br><br>thanks for the encouragement (:

By Hereward on 2009 11 04 - 09:14:25

Hi Hereward<br><br>You could try this community radio station http://www.triplehfm.com.au/about.php located in Hornsby.<br>They have programs called “Wake Up Call” and “The Common Thread” that appear to “on hiatus until further notice”.<br>Maybe that means they are looking for content?<br>Regards<br>Peaky

By Peaky Ramone on 2009 11 04 - 10:10:01

As I had known about Monckton’s speech but not of it’s conversation in the msm, here is another recent discovery, Adelaide University Professor Ian Plimer being interviewed by Auntie ABC’s chief gate-keeper Tony Jones, earlier this year.<br>I was familiar with his book Heaven and Earth and had heard him on the internet, but here he is “in the belly of the beast”.<br>http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2554129.htm<br>TJ is not as belligerent here, as he was in the Global Swindle “Debate” a couple of years ago, though still makes it entirely clear what “the company line is”.<br><br>Now, while I agree with Plimer, Monckton and the likes of Andrew Bolt on THIS issue, I’m not entirely convinced that any, or all of them aren’t in the pay of big oil. For why do these men of conscience remain silent on the anomaly’s re. 9/11?  No $$$ in 9/11 Truth??

By pr on 2009 11 04 - 18:59:04

Chris Monckton on Fox, challenging Al Gore<br >to a debate. 5:15<br>Glenn Beck asking John Bolton whether a New World Order is being ‘cooked’ in secrecy. 8:38 Amusing stuff.<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmLJ2qogW2Q&annotati>When did Beck morph into Alex Jones?<br>Now that the Left’s in power, the Right wing shock jocks have mainstreamed ‘conspiracy theory’?

By pr on 2009 11 05 - 19:50:25

Ian Plimer is interviewed on Financial Sense Newshour 24/10/2009 in the second hour.<br>http://www.financialsense.com/fsn/main.html

By Peaky Ramone on 2009 11 06 - 12:57:51

At least the conversation is now out in the open…<br><br>” KEVIN Rudd has launched a full frontal assault on global warming sceptics, lumping Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull in with a ‘‘new league of world government conspiracy theorists’’ he accuses of sabotaging progress on a climate treaty.”<br>http://www.theage.com.au/environment/rudd-blames-climate-sceptics-for-global-sabotage-20091106-i28m.html<br><br>Woo Hoo.

By pr on 2009 11 07 - 16:49:30

I agree with pr, I also agree with Lord Monckton but when he keeps going on about the the constitution of the US being comprimised by Copenhagen treaty and then starts appearing with John Bolton (?) who is a rabid when it comes to dismantling the constitution and national sovereignty in the name global terrorism. Also some doco’s suggest that the Thatcher government started Global Warming scare to break the coal unions, didnt Monckton work for the Thatcher government?? It seems to me seats for the theoretical world goverment are up for grabs and power hungrey are falling over themselves to get a ticket

By Steve on 2009 11 15 - 12:09:06

Good show !<br><br>Lot’s of truth being spoken here with intelligent commentary. Copenhagen is an exercise in psycho-meta politics. I’m sure that you are aware that right now in late 2009 we have international co-operation in many spheres i.e. Meteorology, Air Traffic Control, Shipping, Arms Traficking, Refugees etc. etc. We do in-fact have a nascent World Government. There is a big difference between a benevolent and a malevolent World Government.<br><br>A question people should ask themselves is…“What is the best model of organisation for the world ?”

By Adam Neira on 2009 11 26 - 18:44:08

MORE ON THE CRU LEAKED EMAILS!<br><br>The CO2 climate change science is a SCAM.<br><br>I haven’t seen any news in Australian about the leaked emails PROVING that the global warming alarmists are FAKING data, and worse, to push the CO2 taxing scheme and world government.<br><br>Find out more about it and contact the PM to voice this - that Emmissions Trading and anything based on CO2 reduction is based on PROVEN junk science that now has no credibility whatsoever.<br><br>1. Google “CRU leaked emails” <br>2. Let our government know that you know<br>3. Reject the Copenhagen Treaty

By CRU Leaked emails on 2009 11 26 - 19:28:42

Interesting viewing for viral release!<br>http://www.prisonplanet.com/emergency-viral-climategate-fraud-exposes-dirty-tricks-agenda-for-global-government.html<br><br>...and our Constitution explained.<br><br>http://www.larryhannigan.com/Constitution.htm

By Will H. on 2009 11 27 - 22:59:01

I suggest you read the treaty which by the way ill invoke the eu agenda treaty we have already signed its on u tube ,its worse than you can imagine and makes hitler look like a boy scout ,all based on a fraud by the communists.if you keep beliveing these fraudsters we will nd up like the uk with no freedom at all.

By terry on 2009 12 09 - 09:48:41

Really interesting article. Hope to see same more!

By Futbolkiua on 2010 12 15 - 09:02:55

It`s really interesting to reed. But all thk about other. Why so?

By Futbolkiua on 2010 12 17 - 09:41:11

fore sure very nice blog website and design. I really hope I’m not bothering you I just sought to inquire just what wordpress plugin you use to show the newest responses on your blog? I really want to do the same for my free iphone blog however I cant locate the plugin or widget for it. Many thanks for your time smile

By ipad for free on 2010 12 18 - 23:53:02

Hello! I am http://topshoesonlinestore.com - shoes shipping worldwide<br>Because online shoes shipping worldwide.<br>I was looking for a shoe store uk to wear with jeans and casual outfits, and also for slightly dressier outfits. These are more dressy than casual, and didn’t fit what I needed. The also ran very small, I ordered an 11ww for my 10-10 1/2 wide foot and they fit with little room to spare. On my right foot they rubbed the joint where my big toe joins my foot. Also the leather was much stiffer than I anticipated. The inside is the shiny leather or leather-look material that tends to make your feet sweat if worn without socks. Pretty shoe, would be okay for someone with an average width foot looking for a work or church type shoe, but had to go back for my purposes. I ordered the Clarks Book Romance instead, they are super soft, casual, and are okay to wear without socks.<br>http://topshoesonlinestore.com - shoe store uk<br>SO amy be you known so http://topshoesonlinestore.com - shoes shipping worldwide, buy increase<br>Queryhttp://topshoesonlinestore.com - shoes international shipping and shoes store uk so known why qip internet explorer keys not http://topshoesonlinestore.com - shoe store uk

By WorldWideShippingShoesq on 2010 12 20 - 23:44:54

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

You are currently visiting as a guest, to login or register please click here.


RSS feed icon

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.


1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?


If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Hereward Fenton
Hereward Fenton

Categories