The political sacrifice of Schapelle Corby

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of November 2, 2011. Part 1 of 1 » Download mp3: click here

03 November 2011 | Permalink | comments: 7
By Hereward Fenton

Share |

WARNING: this podcast will make you angry.

If you take the information seriously and research the links we provide, you will soon realise that the people who govern you have no decency or integrity. If you have a conscience at all this will force you to take a stand. You will not be able to sit on the sidelines any more.

You will be radicalised.

The substantive facts in the story of Schapelle Corby are not well understood, largely because the media has done such a good job of muddying the waters and putting doubt into the minds of the public. We wish to set the record straight, and we wish to inspire the people of Australia to demand accountability from their elected representatives in government. We wish to hold the media to account, and we want the purveyors of baseless smears and hit pieces to be brought to some kind of justice.

In our system of laws a person is innocent until proven guilty. A person does not have to prove innocence, the prosecution must prove guilt. Like it or not, that is the underlying principle of the laws which govern our land, and that is what differentiates a country like Australia from despotic regimes around the world where people can simply disappear if they offend the tyrants who rule over them. It is central to democracy.

We are not claiming absolute proof that Schapelle is innocent. We are claiming an astonishing lack of proof that she is guilty. In addition to that, we have overwhelming evidence that the government colluded in covering up information which may have fully exonerated Schapelle and forced the Indonesians to release her.

For a detailed summary of the the key facts in the Schapelle Corby case, please visit the Expendable Project.

Today's show consists of 2 interviews. The first, conducted on Sydney's Radio Skid Row 88.9 FM, is an interview with one of the creators of the Expendable Project website, who details for us the bombshell evidence that senior members of the Howard government conspired to misinfom the Australian public, Indonesian prosecutors and defence counsel about crucial evidence that Schapelle's bag had been tampered with during her transit from Brisbane to Bali.

In the second interview we talk to Schapelle's uncle Shun Hatton, who knows Schapelle well, and who had been planning to meet her in Bali for the family reunion which ended in disaster in October 2004.

To those who think they know Schapelle is guilty, I wish to remind you that every assertion that has been made linking Schapelle to the drug trade has been debunked. Every single one. There is simply no extant evidence that links Schapelle or her family to the drug trade. Her sister Mercedes continues to live in Bali. She has never been a suspect in any criminal investigation and she won a defamation case against Channel 7 over a series of Today Tonight episodes in which Schapelle's former friend, Jodie Powers, made allegations about the family's drug dealing history. It later emerged that Jodie Powers was paid $100,000 by Seven network for airing these baseless allegations on national TV.

We have previously debunked other rumours about the Corby family which were circulated by mainstream press. For more information on the smear campaigns against Schapelle please check our previous episodes on the subject, and the Schapelle Corby Media Project.

On a final note, if there are visitors to this page who wish to share new information pertaining to this case, we urge you to contact us. Our mission is to find out the truth, rather than to protect or defend any point of view. We will absorb and reflect upon on any new information, regardless of its implications for the guilt or innocence of Schapelle.

Related Links

Comments

Expendable proves Schapelle is innocent. But it also proves something else: that the Howard government were corrupt. They sold her to hide the post 9/11 truth: that the airports were being run by criminals.

They hid evidence. They lied. They covered up. They initiated propaganda. It is there, in their own own letters on Expendable. But not one word in the mainstream media. Silence. If anyone ever wondered why TruthNews was so important, this is the answer.

By Madam Geeky on 2011 11 03 - 18:16:40

It is astonishing how far a government will go in order to hide their shortcomings to the world and it s citizens. The fact that the main stream media in a country like Australia, is aiding this government in spreading false rumours about Schapelle and her family and in doing so manipulating the publics opinion, is to me criminal. They as well are responsible for the condition Schapelle is in now.
Thanks to independent intelligent radio broadcasters like Truth News Australia radio and Radio Skid Row, the truth will come to the people! Thank you guys and girls!

By Nathan Vankerkhove on 2011 11 04 - 09:08:29

I’m not surprised at all how far our governments will go to achieve their own evil ends. Surely we don’t think that our country is immune to the evil, corrupt behavior that we see in other western countries.
Port Arthur should have been our wake up call, at least it was to some. It showed us what some already knew which is that our leaders don’t care about us, not one tiny bit. Their only concern is their own personal gain and they will sacrifice any one of us to achieve their own goals, even a poor innocent girl, at the prime of her life which they took away without a single thought. How will these monsters repay what they’ve taken from Miss Corby ? Will we just stand by without a word as we usually do or will we finally take some action ?

By Jake on 2011 11 04 - 16:11:42

The Schapelle Corby case highlights a disturbing distinction between ‘Eastern” and “Western” court procedure. The principle of innocent until proven guilty appears to be an exclusively “western” protocol with the Indonesian courts adopting the diametrically opposite position.

By Jake on 2011 11 04 - 18:03:44

The notion that under Statute/Admiralty law that one is deemed innocent until proven guilty is incorrect.

The ship of state, “Australia”, is a registered company and by our consent we as crew behave as good corporate citizens under the directorship of our elected board of directors called politicians.

See: http://basic-fraud.com/

http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter15.pdf

and

YouTube Mary Croft Interviews

By Kevin Moore on 2011 12 02 - 10:34:31

Looking for remedies?

Season of Treason History. Kurt Kallenbach’s website is here

http://seasonoftreason.tumblr.com/

By Kevin Moore on 2011 12 04 - 13:37:00

Ummm..what rubbish is this site spurting? There are no links between the corby family and the drug trade? What about james? wasn’t he present when the body board was packed? Wasn’t he at bali airport? Doesn’t he have numerous convictions for drug and violent offences?

By The truth on 2011 12 19 - 19:08:04

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.

1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?

If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.