Celebrating year zero of the eco-technic dictatorship

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of July 4, 2012. Part 1 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

This text will be replaced

Broadcast of July 4, 2012. Part 2 of 2 » Download mp3: click here

07 July 2012 | Permalink | comments: 5
By Hereward Fenton

Share |

Categories: [ 9/11 Truth Movement, Climate Change ]

To mark the introduction into Australia of the most barbaric, pointless and deceptive tax ever conjured up by a phony democracy, we bring you a replay of an interview with Christopher Monckton which dates back to January 2010.

At that time Lord Monckton was touring Australia to talk about climate science fraud and to warn against the introdution of the Emissions Trading Scheme as it was known back then. You can listen to the full, original interview here.

In the second hour, my guest is Joshua Blakeney, co-organiser of the Vancouver 9/11 hearings. In recent shows our guests have raised concerns about the quality and reliability of the research conducted by those who spoke at this event, so in this show we provide an alternate opinion from someone who proudly describes his mission as "expanding the boundaries of 9/11 Truth".

Comments

You can not gain credibility by avoiding certain topics for fear of what the lame-stream media will think. This issue is like the sky trails you deny are anything other than persistent condensation trails. You can not get to the “TRUTH” of any issue if you don’t at-least consider hypothesis that at 1st may seem unbelievable. I find it interesting that even after broadening the position of TNRA, this podcast has not yet received any comments. Oh well Rome was not built in a day. Say hi to John as I cant cos he blocked me.

By Cartoon Hero on 2012 07 09 - 23:56:29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5MtM8OAjy8&list=FLkXNcvq7WH-SX8yyYGz6GYw&index=5&feature=plcp John, U Mad.

By Cartoon Hero on 2012 07 13 - 01:30:57

I Liked to say
I’M A GOOD FAMILY MAN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HARnhWlwSrw&feature=relmfu
Come at me brah… The damage is already done.

By Cartoon Hero on 2012 07 13 - 01:45:44

I may be a bit off point here but when I see the state of the planet, massive unchecked population growth, economic systems based on infinite growth with finite resources. The complete takeover of the media by zionist corporate interests, I find myself hoping and praying that total collapse comes sooner rather than later. I know it will probably mean the death of me and about 5 Billion others. I’m willing to accept that risk. The US Zionist led insanity in the world must stop. Total collapse is coming unfortunately instead of the sudden death approach the west is taking the slow painful road of hyper inflation, massive unemployement and social unrest. The end result will be the same.

By John Doe on 2012 07 15 - 10:54:09

What I don’t get is why such a big deal with this CT/ETS? it will have marginal impact on your money.

I agree with many conspiracies but feel like the Right-wing conspiracists are more likely a corporate funded tool of the oil and gas/ coal companies.

IN Australia our Right wing opposes carbon tax, but also would be most likely to be involved in any kind of 911/false flag conspiracy because they represent a rich minority and are funded by these companies. Dont you see the contradiction? makes no sense!

By prison on 2012 10 26 - 18:34:55

In order to leave a comment you may need to register and sign in.

Recent Comments

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/dane-wigington-on-infowars-4-4-13/#comment-33658

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:31:03
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:28:20
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Geoengineering.pdf

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 11 - 09:19:23
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Leonard Clampett,

the video you linked is a really old conglomerate of all sorts of claims that have been debunked ad nauseam.

What do you think is the ultimate proof for the existence of chemtrails?

Why should we have to assume there is such a thing like chemtrails? How are they different from contrails?

By Josh on 2013 04 10 - 06:59:34
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://realnewsworldwide.com/2008/09/10/chemtrails-ultimate-proof/

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 04 09 - 16:31:36
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

If you open the link you will see the reference to chemtrail area forecasts. The other link I wish to post is refused by the “Truth news” which claims it may be SPAM and “will be moderated”, probably because it mentions chemtrails in the link. However, I will try again by separating the words. http://www.chemtrail forecast.com/main.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 09:02:16
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

about the link you posted - where is the relevance in the discussion about persistent contrails?

By Josh on 2013 03 13 - 08:50:08
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 13 - 08:44:15
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

after you consistently refused to accept the fact that fuel combustion generates more water than the equivalent of fuel burnt - even when a Qantas pilot confirmed this - I am highly skeptical of your “aviation life experience”. I hope you understand that.

So there are more explanations needed before your claims can be taken seriously.

1. How did you determine that the ambient conditions at the upper troposphere were not conducive to the formation of contrails this summer?

2. How did you determine the causal connection between trails and lack of rain?

3. How did you determine the altitude of the low trail that you saw? How can you be sure it was below the cumulus? Why not above (remember: 3D viewing up to 160m max)? Any pictures maybe?

If you want to do REAL research on the Internet, I strongly suggest to repeat every search query that you issue with the word “debunked” appended. That is the way to do proper research because you see both sides and their arguments. Don’t just fall for sensational claims.

Unfortunately, the Internet is loaded with bunk.

By Josh on 2013 03 02 - 18:06:10
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.

Josh Anonymous,

You apparently do not do much research. Notice how, over the Eastern Australian summer, there have been many chemtrails coincident with usual weather patterns where obvious rain should have been the outcome had the chemtrails not been laid, and it was not, and this during the season when ambient conditions are not conducive to the formation of contrails. Chemtrails are entirely different to what you term “persistent contrails” as you would know if you had sufficient aviation life experience. You may try to explain how there was recently, and I have observed the same many times before, a chemtrail below a layer of fair weather Cu at 8,000 ft and how this could possibly occur without the laws of physics and thermodynamics being turned on their head. I suggest that you do an Internet search for the activities of Bill Gates and geoengineering.

By Leonard Clampett on 2013 03 02 - 13:51:00
From the entry 'Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?'.